Skip to main content

Some partial historical truth at heart of argument for Atlantic Yards, as 1983 RPA report gets twisted

There's a partial historical truth--enough for deniability, but not enough to be fully convincing--at the heart of Empire State Development Corporation's 2006 justification for high-density buildings near the Atlantic Terminal transit hub.

Consider p. 38 of the Land Use chapter of the Final Environmental Impact Statement:
The density of the uses on the arena block and Site 5 would be similar to nearby land uses to the north, which are located in the high-density commercial zoning districts of Downtown Brooklyn (see the “Zoning” discussion, below). This is a distinctly beneficial aspect of the proposed project, which would be consistent with the intent of the recent rezoning in Downtown Brooklyn to foster growth in this area (Downtown Brooklyn) by focusing and providing higher-density commercial and residential development where appropriate and where it can be supported by adequate infrastructure, namely transportation (see the discussion on “Today’s Challenge for Economic Growth,” in Chapter 1, “Project Description”). As far back as 1983, the Regional Plan Association (RPA) advocated dense development at this location, stating that the area immediately adjacent to the transit hub “should be built to high density, appropriate to the excellent transportation in Downtown Brooklyn.”
(Bolding and underlining added)

That Regional Plan Association reference was new, not included in the previous Draft Environmental Impact Statement chapter, and a footnote led to p. 17 of a 1983 Regional Plan Plan Association report titled Downtown Brooklyn.

I got that report from the Brooklyn Public Library. And it turns out that the RPA's report did not address the arena block in full, in part because it cut off the rather arbitrary boundary of Downtown Brooklyn at Pacific Street, not Dean Street.

In other words, "this location" and "immediately adjacent" did not go beyond Pacific Street and the Vanderbilt Yard.

The area adjacent to the transit hub, according to the RPA report, was mostly but not exclusively to the north. After all, in 1983, planners had much cleared/empty land to work with.

From the Regional Plan Association's 1983 Downtown Brooklyn report
Looking at the maps

As the map above shows, the RPA's Downtown Brooklyn boundary extended along Pacific from Fourth Avenue to a two-thirds point of the Vanderbilt Yard, not quite at Carlton Avenue but seemingly Cumberland Street.

Oddly enough, the vacant land extended one block east to Carlton Avenue, while the Atlantic Terminal Urban Renewal Area (ATURA) extended all the way to Vanderbilt Avenue. (I aim to check on whether/when ATURA boundaries changed.)

[Corrected and updated] The western segments of the Vanderbilt Yard were a working railyard. The tiny triangle of land west of Fifth Avenue between Atlantic and Flatbush avenues was not vacant, actually.

Yes, part was an unbuilt lot, owned by the MTA (see lot 6, below) and used for storage and other purposes, but the Underberg Building was on that triangle, along with buildings that housed, among other things, auto-related uses and the JRG Fashion Cafe.



Back in 1983, across the street, on the block bounded by Fourth Avenue, Flatbush, Atlantic, and Pacific Street, Site 5 was a parking lot. It later became home to two big-box stores, Modell's and P.C. Richard, and is now slated for a large--perhaps giant--building.

The RPA's text

Here's the text from the page in the RPA report cited in the 2006 Final EIS chapter:
LIRR Terminal: how dense a development? From Regional Plan Association's point of view, this corridor--particularly the LIRR Terminal site--should be built to high density, appropriate to the excellent transportation in Downtown Brooklyn. If the Floor Area Ratio averaged 10, for example, more than 7 million square feet of  office space would house 20,000 to 33,000 employees...
The eventual goal should therefore be 10 million square feet of office space in the Flatbush corridor, new subway stations integrated with the new structures at Nevins Street and Atlantic Avenue, and reconstruction of the LIRR Terminal site for a development worthy of its accessibility. If only part of that can be committed soon, we would recommend starting at the Fulton Mall end of the corridor and leaving the LIRR Terminal site for a development worthy of its accessibility.
Note in the map below the crosshatched lines, indicating "Proposed office building sites," north of Atlantic Avenue at the sites of what are now the Atlantic Terminal and Atlantic Center malls. (The 2004 Atlantic Terminal also has have an office building. The 1996 Atlantic Center may support three future towers.)

Where did RPA recommended starting? At sites east of Flatbush just below Fulton Street.

From the Regional Plan Association's 1983 Downtown Brooklyn report

In the map above, Site 5 is ignored, but the document suggests office space on the two pieces of land bounced by Pacific Street and Atlantic Avenue, and Flatbush Avenue and Sixth Avenue. That would have required decking over the working railyard, which made no economic sense at the time, given the abundant available cleared sites.

Today, the rest of the arena block is now comprised of the area bounded by Flatbush Avenue, Dean Street, and Sixth Avenue, taking in the area between Pacific and Dean. Pacific has been demapped. Two large residential towers are being built, and a third tower is planned.

A fourth tower, at the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic, is approved, but the developers want to move the bulk across the street to Site 5.

The AKRF dodge

There's always been an argument for density near that transit hub, including sites--as now seems clear for part of the arena block--closer to the 2/3 trains at Bergen Street.

But the Regional Plan Association, despite what consultant AKRF wrote in the Atlantic Yards Final EIS, did not include those additional streets, likely because they weren't needed at the time, and they more clearly represented neighborhood-scale Brooklyn.

If AKRF and Empire State Development wanted to make the case that the density argument extended another block, they might have tried to do so. They just shouldn't have said the RPA "advocated dense development at this location."

"They're good writers," an ESD executive said of consultant AKRF at a 2010 public hearing. They also know how to deliver, such as a Blight Study that ignored key facts, and this small but important partial argument.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…