In NY Times exploration of Rep. Jeffries' early career, allies saw his Atlantic Yards stance as forging alliances. Rather, it was more strategic ambiguity.
From a New York Times profile today, The Dual Education of Hakeem Jeffries , subtitled "Shaped by Black Brooklyn and trained by Manhattan’s legal elite, the House Democrats’ new leader is not easily pigeonholed": When Forest City Ratner proposed a multibillion-dollar redevelopment in Mr. Jeffries’s backyard — including an arena that is now home to the Brooklyn Nets — some of his neighbors were flummoxed by his position. Ms. [Letitia] James forcefully opposed the project, known as Atlantic Yards; Mr. [Roger] Green supported it. Mr. Jeffries straddled the divide, saying he was against the use of eminent domain to seize land for the development and some design decisions, but not the project as a whole. “I spent six hours at two meetings with him,” Daniel Goldstein, an opponent of the project, told The New York Times in 2006 . “After six hours, it was unclear to us where he stood.” Allies saw early signs of something else, though — an ability to balance competing and sometimes o...