Skip to main content

Appeals court only moderately engaged with effort to overturn DOB approval of Forest City's modular plans

The legal challenge to the New York City Department of Buildings’ (DOB) approval of Forest City Ratner’s Atlantic Yards modular plans—and, by extension, any similar offsite construction in New York—provoked only moderate engagement yesterday from a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division, First Department.

That suggests an uphill path for the appeal by the Mechanical Contractors Association and the Plumbing Foundation of a 2013 lower court decision upholding the DOB's conclusion that modular construction could proceed in a factory using cross-trained workers without the presence of licensed plumbers and fire suppression contractors.

The cross-trained workers, of course, are paid less, and part of why modular construction is supposed to cost less than conventional construction.

(With the first Atlantic Yards tower, the long-stalled B2, cost overruns and disputes over the factory have elongated the timetable and raised the cost. Separate from this lawsuit, in a legal dispute between Forest City Ratner and former partner Skanska, the latter has charged that cross-trained workers aren't up to the job.)

Safety jeopardized?

Beginning the 18-minute argument, Bret Jaffe, representing the appellants, stressed the seeming unfairness of requiring licensed trades workers to perform such crucial work on-site but not in the factory, thus jeopardizing safety.

Justice Barbara Kapnick soon interrupted, noting there was “very strict oversight” at the modular factory. “Doesn’t that take care of the safety concerns?”

No, responded Jaffe. The licensed plumbers at the building site, he contended, could not evaluate the whether the work was properly done at the factory. The DOB, he said, does not have the authority to decide where licensing applies.

A building? A structure?

Justice Rosalyn H. Richter asked Jaffe to respond to the city’s argument that modules built in the factory—components of a future building, with at least two or three needed to form an apartment—are not buildings.

DOB, Jaffe said, “suggests ‘building’ is a term of art. That’s nonsense.”

“You say modular construction is a structure?” asked a quizzical Justice Peter Tom.

“A structure is a broadly defined term,” Jaffe pointed out.

Forest City in legal papers, had noted that a structure, according to the city Administrative Code, is “[t]hat which is built or constructed, including among other things: buildings, stadia, tents, reviewing stands, platforms, stagings, observation towers, radio towers, tanks, trestles, open sheds, fences, and display signs.”

Jaffe said that description did encompass a modular unit, since a building, by definition, is not a finished structure.

Justice Richard Friedman, however, suggested that a modular unit didn’t satisfy the code’s requirement. Indeed, when the lawyer for the DOB got her turn, she noted that all the examples “are completed, are self-sustaining.”

Furthering public safety

Richter pointed to what she called “real issue: how does the interpretation you would like us to adopt further public safety?”

The record, the judge was told by the DOB lawyer, demonstrates “extensive efforts” to oversee quality control during the production process. Beyond that, the city agency deserved deference from the courts, which should not interfere with the decision..

Forest City Ratner attorney Bradley Ruskin said “there’s nothing in the record to support the speculation that this is unsafe.”

“When counsel says there’s no way to check,” Kapnick countered, invoking Jaffe, “it does seem some kind of safety issue.”

“Every step in the factory is approved,” Ruskin said, adding that there’s no discretion for variability from the standard. (Then again, setting the modules didn’t work so well at the site, given the apparent slight deviations from standard.)

Jaffe, given a brief rebuttal, said the issue was whether DOB followed the plain language of the code. “The issue here is entirely about safety,” he said, bringing up the recent episode in which illegal siphoning of gas in the East Village apparently led to a horrific fire.

“The reason rigorous licensing requirements exist,” he added, is to avoid that kind of a problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

Click on graphic to enlarge. This is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change, and the project is already well behind that tentative timetable.


Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…