Skip to main content

A $950 million arena? Either that cost is bogus (goosed for PILOTs?), AY might now cost $6 billion, or the ESDC math was off

Why exactly was the Atlantic Yards arena supposed to cost nearly $1 billion? The numbers just don't compute.

The rapid escalation of the cost of the arena--from $435 million [clarified] in 2003 to $637.2 million at approval in 2006 to $950 million this year--significantly outpaces local inflation in construction costs.

That leads to some troubling speculations--even if the cost may have dipped a bit recently.

Has entire project cost jumped 50%?

If the $950 million figure is in fact accurate, then the entire Atlantic Yards project has increased in cost nearly 50% from $4 billion, and government oversight agencies should be taking a second look at whether a $6 billion project is remotely viable, as Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn suggested in June.

Was value of arena inflated?

Alternatively, if the project cost as a whole has not gone up commensurately, the value of the arena may have be inflated by adding improper costs, perhaps in the same way as Assemblyman Richard Brodsky and Rep. Dennis Kucinich have alleged in their recent investigations of Yankee Stadium.

(An inflated value would allow for more tax-exempt bonds, repaid via PILOTs, or payments in lieu of taxes.)

Were the numbers off?

Were the numbers not accurate from the start? For example, at right is a document the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) released to the Public Authorities Control Board before the latter's December 2006 vote to approve state financing for Atlantic Yards. It did not become publicly available until it surfaced in litigation last year, well after the approval vote.

There are two curious aspects to this document. (Click to enlarge.)

First, the cost of the Urban Room is included, but the Urban Room is not a sports facility eligible for tax-exempt bonds. (Would only taxable bonds be used for the Urban Room?) The ESDC described it as a "publicly accessible atrium that would serve as a dramatic gateway to the arena and provide a place for people to congregate... [I]t would serve as an entrance to the office space and hotel in Building 1, the restaurant and cafe, the arena (its ticket booths would be located here), and a new access point to the subway via an underground connection..."

Developer Forest City Ratner, apparently, is prepared to brand the Urban Room as ADT Plaza.

Also, the cost of the land for the arena was never included in the total cost. If it is now part of the $950 million cost, then the information presented to the PACB was misleading.

Whatever the explanation, there's good reason for Brodsky and Kucinich to investigate the Atlantic Yards numbers.

Escalating estimates

Let's recap. When Atlantic Yards was announced in 2003, the arena was projected to cost $435 million.

By April 2004, the cost was said to be at least $500 million. By September 2005, the cost was $555.3 million, as noted in the Independent Budget Office's Fiscal Brief.

By project approval in December 2006, the cost was $637.2 million. In March 2008, the developer announced a $950 million cost, a 49.1% increase in just 15 months.

Construction cost comparisons

How does that compare to construction costs elsewhere?

New York City Department of Finance Commissioner Martha Stark testified before Congress on October 24 regarding Yankee Stadium: "Labor, transportation and overall construction costs are about 40 percent higher in New York City, on average, than in the other cities."

However, the Atlantic Yards arena would be 250% the cost of the Prudential Center, which opened last year in Newark and cost $380 million. Even though that figure would need adjustment--the AY arena wouldn't open for three years--it still seems out of line.

Construction costs rise, but not as much

As of this summer, construction costs were rising, as the New York Post on 7/30/08 reported:
The cost of construction in the Big Apple has risen faster than the city's skyline - 32 percent in just three years, due to the high price of local labor, tighter supplies of materials and the added expense of building in a congested city, a new study found.

Three years ago, the projected cost was $555.3 million; 32% of that is $177.7 million. Add those numbers together and the total is $733 million, not $950 million.

Construction costs now declining?

Note that, since the $950 million figure was announced, construction costs likely have declined, due to the economic downturn, as noted on a recent episode of Fox Business News.

That suggests that the entire project may have declined somewhat in (projected) cost. But it still doesn't explain the relationship between the cost of the arena and the cost of the rest of the project.

Arena as % of total cost: $6B project?

Initially, the project was announced at $2.5 billion; a $400 million arena would represent 16% of the total cost.

Note that in 2005, a one-acre plot of land, Site 5, was added to the project, and would be occupied by a significant tower.

As approved, a $637.2 million arena would be 15.9% of a $4 billion project cost.

If the arena would be just 16% of the total project cost, a $950 million arena implies a project cost nearing $6 billion.

Possible inflated costs

Though Brodsky's investigation of Yankee Stadium did not come to definitive conclusions, his interim report pointed to "various categories of cost asserted by the Yankees and accepted by DOF seem unusual in both their nature and their value," including “Luxury/Sky/Boxes,” apparently duplication of contingency costs, unusually high soft costs (legal, architectural, etc.), plus costs for the construction of property not legally part of the Stadium, such as a new police station.

Kucinich, in a letter in October to Mayor Mike Bloomberg, drew similar conclusions. At an October 24 hearing, Stark did not in her prepared testimony directly address such alleged cost inflation and the hearing mostly concerned the use of comparable sites for assessment, not such cost inflation.

Perhaps a follow-up hearing will look more deeply into the Yankee Stadium numbers--and those for Atlantic Yards.

Savings on bonds

The IBO, in its 2005 report on AY, attempted to estimate the savings on tax-exempt bonds:
Using the current spread of 1.5 percentage points between interest rates for tax-exempt economic development bonds and corporate bonds and assuming that the entire $555.3 million cost of constructing the arena is debt financed over 30 years, this subsidy has a present value of $91 million (in 2005 dollars) over the financing period.

That's 16.4% of the total. If, as reported, Forest City Ratner seeks $800 million in tax-exempt bonds, a 16.4% savings would be $131.2 million.

However, based on updated numbers from the IBO, I previously estimated $165 million. While that may have been more accurate a few months ago, the changing economic environment may demand a recalculation--for this and a whole lot more.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

This graphic, posted in November 2017, is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. Note the unbuilt B1 and the proposed shift in bulk to the unbuilt Site 5.

The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change. The project is already well behind that tentative timetable.

How many people are expected?

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park has a projected 6,430 apartments housing 2.1 persons per unit (as per Chapter 4 of the 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement), which would mean 13,503 new residents, with 1,890 among them in low-income affordable rentals, and 2,835 in moderate- and middle-income affordable rentals.

That leaves 8,778 people in market-rate rentals and condos, though let's call it 8,358 after subtracting 420 who may live in 200 promised below-market condos. So that's 5,145 in below-market units, though many of them won't be so cheap.

As…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park in 2017: no new towers, unfilled affordable units, Islanders prepare to leave, project timetable fuzzy

My 2018 preview.

It was another wait-and-see year for Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, with one big twist--the beginning of a slow goodbye for the New York Islanders--but continued delays for towers, a lost (mostly) 421-a subsidy for condos, and new skepticism about unfilled not-so-affordable housing units.

So ongoing questions linger regarding the project's pace, affordability, and even future ownership.

In my 2017 preview, I predicted--not exactly going out on a limb--that two and likely three more towers would open, though it would be unclear how fast they'd lease up and sell.

Indeed, we've learned that the middle-income below-market units at 461 Dean (which opened in 2016) and 535 Carlton have leased very slowly, while it's too soon to assess progress for commensurate units at 38 Sixth. (At 535 Carlton and 38 Sixth, middle-income units make up half the "100% affordable" buildings.) Meanwhile, many apartments are up for rent at the 550 Vanderbilt condo buildin…