Skip to main content

Hints of FCR producing CBA-related statistics (where's independent monitor?), and reasons for doubt (including history of lies, MWBE padding, "community" questions)

Can we trust the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement (CBA), the one dissed (along with other New York CBAs) by one analyst as a "borderline calamity" and described in one 2013 NextCity article as having "no guarantees that benefits will flow to others in need"?

Remember this January 2008 affidavit from Forest City Ratner attorney Jeffrey Braun, which claimed that, "pursuant to an innovative [CBA], the FCRC affiliates that sponsor the project are contractually bound to provide a wide array of far-reaching benefits to the historically most disadvantaged segments of Brooklyn’s communities.”

Well, we know how well one of the most significant benefits, job training for construction jobs, worked out: big promises, dashed hope, a bitter lawsuit, and a murky settlement.

I've described some of what we know about the CBA, but we may learn more soon.

Last Friday, Michael West of Devotion NYC, the fledgling organization pushing for community accountability (and a job-related contract for an affiliate, which is self-serving) met with Forest City External Affairs executive Ashley Cotton, reporting that she "confidently communicated a number of stats regarding employment, construction contracting, post-construction contracting, business development and more."

"The figures sounded overwhelmingly positive upon first listen," he wrote. "She agreed to send us [a written record]! This is a huge for the community. It means that for the first time, the work F.C.R.C. has done will be public!"

This is unwise, since, as I wrote on Twitter, "wasn't the point of Independent Compliance Monitor that Forest City Ratner not be self-reporting?" Devotion NYC responded "That would definitely be/have been ideal. We're still looking forward to the data #FCRC produces though!"

Reasons for skepticism

Forest City never hired the Independent Compliance Monitor required by the 2005 Community Benefits Agreement, which was supposed to report back on not only the developer's performance but also that of Forest City's partners.

That's a fundamental shadow over their claims. And now that Forest City is the junior parter of Greenland Forest City Partners, Ashley Cotton is the spokesperson for a joint venture controlled by a Chinese corporation that came in after the CBA was used to accomplish Forest City's political goals.

And even if they can claim their numbers are vetted by an "independent" monitor, I'd say: show us the data.

Any data Forest City provides should come with an asterisk, and deserves reigorous analysis, since their self-reporting is too often misrepresentation or flat-out lying. Consider the consistent claim of "2000 jobs" at the arena, which the developer admitted was 1,240 FTE (full-time equivalent) jobs. 

Is that even true? I'm doubtful, given that even a major event would require some 800 workers and shifts aren't eight hours. (Yes, the arena has staff 24/7, but let's see the data.)

Forest City was typically cagey about what workers earn and how many hours a week they work, but when I spoke last year with a former security guard at a union protest, she lamented that "you're lucky if you work 16 hours in a week."

Consider Forest City's willingness to lie or obfuscate about:
  • the actual affordability of apartments at 461 Dean (aka B2), which are less affordable than claimed
  • the plan to pile new density on Site 5, which was denied before they were confirmed
  • the nonunion shop at steel supplier Banker Steel, claimed to be union at a Council hearing
  • the interest rate on an EB-5 loan for the Nassau Coliseum
  • the schedule for closing Atlantic Avenue
  • the problems, including mold and misalignment, with the B2 modular tower
Planned configuration in B3 and B14, the two new all-affordable towers
Consider the fact that, while they are indeed on their way to building 2,250 below-market "affordable" units, the distribution so far skews significantly toward middle-income households earning six figures.

That's far different than what was promised in the CBA and the associated Affordable Housing Memorandum of Understanding signed by ACORN.

Specifically, the highest-income affordable cohort, or "band," was supposed to represent 20% of the affordable units. Instead, in the next two "100% affordable towers," representing about 600 units, it's 50%.

Measuring MWBE contracting?

From the CBA
One issue that deserves particular scrutiny is the pledge that 20% of total construction contract dollars was supposed to go to MBEs (minority-owned business enterprises) and 10% to WBEs (women-owned business enterprises). Another 20% of post-construction contracting is supposed to go to MWBEs.

Note the fuzzy results in the past. When I reported on this in 2012, Forest City had reported 16.3% in contracts to MBEs and 6.3% to WBEs, which meant the combined MWBE participation was 22.6%, about three-quarters of the way toward the goal of 20% MBE plus 10% WBE.

However, Empire State Development reported a total of 15.4% to certified MWBE firms, which meant Forest City had counted companies that had not registered or were too large/prosperous to qualify under state rules.

What's the "community"?

Beyond that, the question arises: what's the community? It's hardly clear that "the historically most disadvantaged segments of Brooklyn's communities" are the same the varied concepts of "community" used in discussing and analyzing the CBA.
After all, the groups that signed the CBA mainly represented constituencies in African-American Central Brooklyn, aiming for "systemic changes in the traditional ways of doing business on large urban development projects." (See screenshot above.)

Columnist Errol Louis (now of NY1) wrote in Our Time Press in December 2005, "At this stage of the game the question should be how and when the dollars will begin flowing into central Brooklyn."

But it's hardly systemic change if a woman-owned major company from Long Island is hired, as I've written, for regular demolition work.

This remains an unresolved issue regarding CBAs. At a hearing in 2010,  Christopher Collins, former counsel to the Council's Land Use Committee, observed: "Who’s the community? Is it the elected officials? Is it the civic association? Is it the Community Board? Who gets to decide who’s on the community team? There’s no guidance that really tells us that.”

The letter, but not the spirit, of the rules

As I wrote way back in October 2005, Forest City's hiring of established minority and women-owned firms to do consulting, bookkeeping and public relations work hardly encouraged systemic changes. 

Consider that even the recent hiring of Marvel Architects to design the B15 tower at Sixth Avenue between Dean and Pacific streets may constitute CBA compliance because Marvel Architects, as stated on its web site, is a "Certified Minority Owned Business Enterprise."

I queried the firm, and Timothy J. Rowan, Managing Director, replied that Marvel Architects was a NYC-certified MBE and had a state application pending: "Jonathan Marvel, the primary shareholder, was born, raised and educated in Puerto Rico and has Hispanic heritage."

Jonathan Marvel
So his firm qualifies, at least under city rules, which require at least 51% ownership/control/operation by a U.S. citizen or permanent resident who is part of "a designated minority group(s) including Black, Hispanic, Asian Pacific, and Asian-Indian OR a woman or women." 

New York State rules are similar--"Persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Dominican, Cuban, Central or South American descent of either Native American or Latin American origin, regardless of race"--but disallow those with net worth exceeding $3.5 million (after certain deductions).

Marvel's a fine architect, but the hiring of someone with his pedigreefamily history in architecture, and impressive record of work might fulfill the letter but not the spirit of the CBA and state goals.

"Last in line" for the program

Consider this 12/3/15 essay by David Mark Greaves, editor/publisher, of Bedford-Stuyvesant-based Our Time Press, View From Here: Gentrification, W/MBE and Wrongly-used Black Spending Power, which called for a focus on African-Americans:
And now moving that needle is a gargantuan task, only complicated by the newly-minted American espousal of ethnic and gender fairness which prevents favoring one group over another. That Asians and women receive 94% of the M/WBE payouts is no reason to favor Hispanics and African-Americans. When the truth of the matter is that it was the land stolen from the indigenous people and the labor stolen from the Africans that were used to build the foundation of this country. To be last in line for a program, whose intent should be to correct that original sin, is galling.
...So today, African-Americans and Hispanics are last in line for the 4% that is not given to what are euphemistically called non-MBE vendors; i.e., the white men and the W/MBE women who receive 96.9% of the city’s business.
The way the city spends its money deserves a “Black Lives Matter” movement of its own.
He was writing about city contracts, but surely similar concerns apply to state-overseen public-private partnerships. Let's see the "overwhelmingly positive" figures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.