Skip to main content

The railyard runaround: developers gave public and electeds different timeline, claim dubiously that change came only after last June

They didn’t tell us that Atlantic Avenue would be constricted a lot longer than they announced in June 2014.

In fact, the developers of Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park misled us for a year, and last week provided an explanation I find quite dubious.

More than a year ago, officials at Greenland Forest City Ratner changed the timeline for work on the Vanderbilt Yard, guaranteeing an extension of barriers and constricted traffic on Atlantic Avenue.

They shifted the date for completing the West Portal—a connection from the railyard to Atlantic Terminal that requires work under Atlantic Avenue near Sixth Avenue outside the Barclays Center—from early 2016 to late 2017.

They just forgot to tell the public, the press, and the Community Boards.

They did, apparently, tell some elected officials of their new plan, but they did so in such an oblique way none of the officials shared the information or even recognized it was news.

”There’s nothing about the West Portal that's changed,” Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton said at a meeting last month, after which I described the delays as “vexing.”

(Last month, they described West Portal work as lasting through 2017, but in the most recent document clarify that it the work should continue through July 2017, with railyard reconfiguration lasting through 2017.)

Cotton pledged to discuss the issue at a future meeting and did so at the barely-attended Oct. 14 Community Update meeting.

Explaining the work

“Let's just think about it,” Cotton said. “We're going to finish West Portal railyard work [a newly configured yard to store and service LIRR trains], the East Portal… then we're building a platform, then we’re building buildings."

"I don’t mean to be gloom and doom… the idea that the MPT [the barriers known as the Maintenance and Protection of Traffic] moves an inch and inch… This is ongoing at the site for a long time.” (The presentation is at bottom.)

In other words, they should have told us not only that Atlantic Avenue would be constricted not only for West Portal work—the timeline of which has now been extended—but for the next decade.

Latest timeline
“We’re in this together, we appreciate your patience,” Cotton said to a crowd that included far more people from the developer and state government than the community. “We are always going to give you the dates we have and all that kind of stuff,… December 2017 is relevant, sort of, but then we're moving on to the next thing and the next thing. That's my best way of delivering tough news, but this is not like, ‘Oh, yay, we got to December 2017 and suddenly the MPTs start going away, particularly as it relates to these railyards.’”

Timeline announced June 2014
Cotton noted that, last month, resident Gib Veconi pointed out that the work was supposed to be done by next spring. He said"you may remember a pitch to get Democratic National Convention in there by the summer of 2016.”

In other words, the switcheroo practiced last year preceded the energetic campaign to bring the DNC to Brooklyn.

That means the developer knew what a mess a main artery around the arena would be at the time of the convention but did not say so.

Describing the work

Cotton noted that last month people pointed to a change in completion date for the West Portal from what was stated in a presentation released 6/2/14.

Cotton noted that Greenland Forest City had not made a “big announcement” last month, because it didn’t think it had real news to share.

“We went back and figured out what happened,” she recounted. “What's the next big thing that happened last June? We signed [a joint venture agreement] with our dear partners, Greenland, we posted a completion guarantee for the MTA, and we got really deep in the railyard.”

“We realized that, if you are going to start building all around this area near the West Portal and then the railyard work.. and then you’re going to build foundations for a platform and building... we were going to be going in and ripping things up that we’ve already built..”

“So we figured out a more efficient, more sophisticated, smarter way to do this... so we added scope to what we call the West Portal work, and therefore changed the date of completion,” she said. That doesn’t mean delays, it just means a shift, with more work up front. “if you add platform foundation, building foundations to what we’re going in the bed of that railyard work, it will take us longer...thus December 2017.”

“Super sorry we didn’t make it clear here,” Cotton said. “We actually called all the politicians and notified them. And obviously it was all done with total approval from the MTA.”

Reasons for skepticism

I'm not convinced. How could Forest City and Greenland, after June 2014, somehow come up with a new plan?

After all, Forest City in April proposed a new December 2017 timetable for the railyard.

The plan was approved by the MTA in late June. In other words, a change had been percolating for a while. (I could find no record of any additional plan developed after June, and Cotton would not provide more detail.)

Bizarrely enough, by the way, none of this was subject to review in the court-ordered Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement completed last year, because the railyard work was considered part of Phase 1 of the project, not Phase 2.

A new component


Cotton described three pieces of work: the West Portal, railyard work, and the East Portal.

The East Portal? That term does not appear in any document regarding plans for Atlantic Yards construction. It appears only as a side reference in a few Construction Updates

The West Portal will provide an advantageous direct connection to the railyard, as opposed to the current East Portal, in which trains must go east of Vanderbilt Avenue and then reverse course back to the passenger terminal.

Because of the big cement structure that is the East Portal, the track behind it can only hold a 6-car train, while the other six storage tracks can hold an 8-car train. “In order to extend the track to have an 8-car train, we will modify the East Portal,” Cotton said, which requires removing the wall and moving the tracks. That will make a 56-car railyard.

That’s very interesting, because East Portal work was not contemplated—at least in public documents—when the replacement railyard was supposed to have 9 tracks with capacity for 76 cars, rather than the smaller railyard Forest City renegotiated in 2009.

Could it be that the smaller railyard requires work that was not even anticipated in the larger one?

Trying to drill down

When did they tell the politicians?

“We told all the politicians... like a year ago. That’s the thing… When I said I’m not breaking big news to you guys. It’s a total mess,” Cotton said rather matter of factly, “it’s my fault, I apologize.. but it is not a change in the schedule, where suddenly, the project’s farther out.. it's just that we decided to do more work up front.”

I got a copy of a document shared with elected officials. There’s no explicit statement about a change in plans, but one page does say 2017—not July 2017—regarding the railyard.

The document also states that the green roof would be completed by May 2015 (it's not done yet) and the B2 modular tower would be finished by December 2015 (it could take a year longer). In other words, all dates are subject to change.

At the meeting, I asked Cotton whether they could provide more detail on the work, how it’s expanded and the timetable. She said no.

I later sent an email asking which elected officials were told, and when. I didn't get an answer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…