Skip to main content

Inside Forest City/Greenland agreement: credit line for railyard (diminished by EB-5 funds); loan to buy land; development fee

We now know some more details about the deal between Forest City Ratner and the Greenland Group, which bought 70% of the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park project going forward, not including the arena and the B2 modular tower. They include:
  • a credit line from Greenland (offset by EB-5 funds) to build the railyard
  • a 6% loan from Greenland for Forest City to buy land
  • an unspecified development fee
  • a process governing each partner's effort to sell its shares
That's according to the Greenland Forest City LLC Agreement, dated 6/30/14, which I recently received--albeit with redactions and without several attachments--after a Freedom of Information Law request.

Greenland's $250M in credit

Click to enlarge
As noted in the excerpt at right, on or after the Effective Date (the signing of the agreement), Greenland agreed to provide up to $250 million in credit to "the Company"--a Forest City affiliate that has since admitted Greenland as a co-member--to construct 70% of the permanent railyard.

The two members in the joint venture--Greenland and Forest City--together would pay the remaining 30%.

But it's not like Greenland will be on the hook for that $250 million. The sum "shall be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by the amount borrowed or assumed by the Company or applicable Subsidiary on account of "the New EB-5 financing."

After all, as I just reported, Forest City and Greenland raised $249 million in the second round of EB-5 financing from immigrant investors, which can be be used for the railyard, as well as to pay the Metropolitan Transportation Authority for development rights, and more.

It's unclear how the EB-5 financing would be repaid, but presumably the 70/30 split would be maintained.

A 6% loan

Forest City, according to the document, has several unilateral obligations.

Click to enlarge
Notably, as suggested in the excerpt at left, Forest City must take care of all payments to condemnees for "Phase I land" taken by eminent domain.

In the interim, however, the Company--the joint venture--agreed to loan Forest City money at 6%--a relatively gentle interest rate--to cover such payments.

What is "Phase I land"?

Well, according to the excerpt below from the LLC agreement, it includes three towers on the arena block (excepting the B2 modular tower, which began before Greenland jointed the picture), and the four towers on the southeast block of the project, Block 1129, where two towers are already under construction.

A development fee

Click to enlarge
Note that the new joint venture will pay Forest City a development fee (aka "Project Services Fee") and Greenland a development fee, based on all spending.

The development fee was originally supposed to be 5%. Presumably that will continue.

If so, and the split is 70/30, that would mean 1.5% to Forest City and 3.5% to Greenland.

But perhaps the split is not 70/30, if Forest City does the heavy lifting.

Either way, the development fee is surely part of of Forest City's bottom line calculations.

Transferring the project

An extensive section of the document, starting on page 60, relates to transfers from Forest City and Greenland to related entities and outside entities.

Forest City can't transfer its interests to a "Greenland Competitor," defined as a real estate construction or development firm with its principal place of business in China or Hong Kong.

Greenland, in turn, can't transfer its interests to a "Forest City Competitor," though the definition isn't clear; it means any "Entities or Related Parties" in Exhibit S, which was not included.

In case of potential transfers, each must offer the other a "ROFO Notice" and "ROFO Price," referring to a right of first offer.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…