Skip to main content

Despite the arena hoopla, are they making their nut? Forest City's behind on contractually obligated revenues, and stated $4 million for Calvin Klein sponsorship claim looks doubtful

The Barbra Streisand concert announced recently may be "a feather in the cap of the promoters of the arena," as the Times suggested, and the Justin Bieber announcement generated more buzz, as did even the announcement of a couple of hockey games from the Eastern European professional league, KHL.

However--and this question was relevant even before the Nets didn't get lucky in the NBA lottery--it doesn't remove the question mark over whether the Barclays Center will bring in the revenue predicted from ticket sales and sponsorships.

After all, in late March parent company Forest City Enterprises reported that some "64 percent of forecasted contractually obligated revenues for the [Barclays Center] arena are currently under contract."

While that's a not insignificant rise from the 56 percent reported in December 2011, the developer has admitted that the 100% mark will not be met by the arena opening.

The next quarterly report arrives late this afternoon and it should factor in the announcement that Calvin Klein signed on as a Founding Partner, in a deal reported at $4 million a year.

So we'll see how much closer they are to the 100%.

However, as described below, it's doubtful that the Founding Partner deals are worth $4 million a year.

Yormark's optimism, but reasons for skepticism

Nets/Barclays Center CEO Brett Yormark has been typically optimistic. "Our balance sheet changes dramatically with the move from New Jersey to Brooklyn, he said in a 5/1/12 ESPN interview, noting that 75% of suites had been sold.

Indeed, there are many more revenue streams. "We've never really been embraced by a community," Yormark said. "Brooklyn has 2.6 million people. There's close to 6 million people within a ten-mile radius of the Barclays Center."

He said it was not necessary to convert Knicks fans: "Our goal is to own Brooklyn. If we can own Brooklyn, we'll be very, very viable in the marketplace."

While Yormark certainly has reason for optimism, he also has a track record, shall we say, of incomplete candor regarding the arena timetable.

Also, Yormark and the Nets have long claimed that the Barclays naming rights agreement is still worth $400 million, despite documentation that the number was cut to $200 million plus unspecified additional sums.

Did Nets have $100 million in sponsorship deals?

As of mid-2008, Yormark claimed that the Nets had secured more than $100 million in Barclays Center sponsorship deals, though a year and a half later, a bond official document suggested that the sponsorship deals were worth only about $55 million.

That means either Yormark was blowing smoke or the deals were renegotiated in the wake of the recession--or maybe even both.

The $100 million claim came in a 5/12/08 Sports Business Journal article, headlined Nets add 6 founding partners for Barclays:
The Nets have more than 100 million reasons to stay on course and move to Brooklyn.
While the organization’s Barclays Center project is mired in legal delays and reports surfaced recently that New Jersey officials were making a run to have the team move to the Prudential Center in Newark, Nets Sports & Entertainment President and CEO Brett Yormark said last week that he expects to break ground in the fourth quarter of this year and open the building in time for the 2010-11 season.
And as evidence, Yormark said the team has signed six new founding partners that join previously announced Jones Soda, representing more than $100 million in sponsorship commitments in the new building. The founding-partner deals are all five to 10 years in length and range from $1.5 million to $5 million a year, Yormark said.
Most are existing Nets sponsors: Anheuser-Busch, Cushman & Wakefield, MGM Grand/Foxwoods, ADT, Emblem Health and Izod, which has naming rights to the Nets’ current home court at the Meadowlands.
(Emphasis added)

Reasons for doubt

A year-and-a-half later, however, there was little evidence of $100 million.

The 12/16/09 Official Statement issued by Goldman, Sachs for potential buyers of arena bonds identified only about $55 million worth of Founding Partner/Sponsorship deals: $11 million-plus a year over an average of five years, as noted in the graphic below:

Note that that's the "Arena Portion," which indicates potential room for sums to flow to the Nets, as well. But no additional sum was announced.

$4 million a year?

However, despite the recent report in the New York Post that Founding Partner "deals cost north of $4 million annually, said industry sources," the evidence from the bond document indicates otherwise. The screenshot below indicates both Founding Partners and Founding Sponsors.

Among the list below, current Founding Partners include Cushman & Wakefield, EmblemHealth, Foxwoods Resort Casino, and MetroPCS.

If each of them were paying $4 million a year, the annual revenue fee from just those four alone--leaving aside the others listed: ADT, Anheuser-Busch, Brooklyn Burger, High Point Solutions, Jones Soda, and Phillips-Van Heusen--would be $16 million.

However, the annual total, as noted in the bond document, was about $11 million.

Now there are some new Founding Partners and Legacy Partners, as indicated in the PDF below--for example, Jones Soda ended its deal and Coke entered, and a whole bunch of smaller deals have been signed.

What's the current number? Unclear.

But "industry sources" should be taken with a grain of salt.

Barclays Center Founding Partners/Legacy Partners May 10, 2012

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.