Skip to main content

FOILed: waiting for responses from ESDC (and comparing their practices with other agencies)

I suspect some staffers at the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) think I'm a bit of a pest, though they're professional and don't say so explicitly. After all, I file regular Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) requests, sometimes a couple each month.

And it usually takes a long time to get responses from the ESDC, especially compared to more responsive agencies such as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA).

(The ESDC's public affairs office, by contrast, generally responds promptly to my queries, though the level of detail, um, varies.)

Seeking info on affordable housing

Last December, I filed a FOIL request for records explaining whether the ESDC considered the availability of tax-exempt financing for affordable housing when it was approving Atlantic Yards.

For months, I got a certified letter each month explaining that they were still looking, given that my request was broad. That's hard to judge, but it sure seemed like a long time.

In a brief public comment during the last desultory moments of the July 30 public hearing on Atlantic Yards, I mentioned the lingering request and asked for it to be resolved. I finally got a response in August. Coincidence or result? I can't be sure.

The KPMG report

After the ESDC board meeting September 17, ESDC Senior Counsel Steve Matlin said that the KPMG market study mentioned at the meeting might have some proprietary information, but said staff would look at the issue--and presumably decide about releasing the document--"in the next few days."

I and others finally got it on October 7, a day after I'd published a video of Matlin's statement.

Coincidence or result? I can't be sure. Eliot Brown of the New York Observer had filed a FOIL request, and wrote that he received the report in response to that request.

Certified mail

I file my requests via email but I get the responses via snail mail, certified, at $5.54 a clip for the thinnest of envelopes.

This adds up.

First, I get an acknowledgment that they've received my request. Someday, perhaps, I get the response to my request.

In between, however, I typically get a monthly letter indicating that they're still searching for responsive records.

Compounding the problem

So, I get a lot of mail, and I'm almost never home to receive it. If I didn't live alone, or designated someone to accept my mail, this wouldn't be a problem.

Instead, I must go to my local post office, wait on line, then wait for the postal worker to find the particular letter at issue. It's a 20-minute round-trip for me to walk to the post office, but that's only the first step.

The wait on line can be ten to 30 minutes, while the wait at the counter for the postal worker to retrieve the piece of mail can take three to 20 minutes. Twice I've waited 20 minutes only to learn that the letter cannot be found.

All this for a piece of mail, which, more often than not, is a merely administrative formality rather than one containing information requested.

I know ESDC can't be blamed for this, but I see it as karmically balancing the perceived frustration on both ends of the transacton.

A better way?

Other agencies manage with greater efficiency and lower cost. The New York City Economic Development Corporation responds by email.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the New York City Department of City Planning send both email and snail mail (at $.44/letter, right), but don't certify the latter.

If other agencies can manage, couldn't the ESDC do so as well?

Spokesman Warner Johnston responded, "We maintain the highest standards when it comes to following the provision of FOILs and utilize certified mail as it is the most reliable method to ensure that FOILs are received by the time set by law."

Sure, certified mail is the most reliable method to ensure that a delivery attempt is made by the time set by law. Actual receipt, as I've discovered, is another matter.

Allocating costs

Johnston added, "We spend exponentially more tax dollars and staff hours in researching and gathering information for broadly worded FOIL requests than we do in postage expense."

Similarly, as noted in the 10/14/09 letter at right, in response to a 4/20/09 request, the ESDC FOIL officer told me:
ESDC continues to sort and review a large number of documents for potentially responsive information at considerable agency time and effort.
I don't doubt that in-house effort costs more than postage, though I suspect that the ESDC also has spent exponentially more paying environmental consultant AKRF--the tab neared $5 million in May 2007--and outside counsel for the lawsuits the project has engendered.

Also, some of that cost responding to FOIL requests might have been obviated had the ESDC been more transparent from the start.

And the ESDC has not exactly been penny-pinching; after all, as the New York Post reported in September, former agency head Avi Schick was paid his $213,000 annual salary for eight months after his resignation.

That $142,000 could pay for a lot of transparency.

Saving time

I'd note that the process of sending a certified letter takes more time than email.

It's not a huge issue, but, if and when some agency or consultant takes a broad look at FOIL practices, it's worth consideration: why have other agencies decided they need not maintain such high (and somewhat more costly) standards?

City responsiveness

While some city agencies have been somewhat more responsive than the ESDC, that doesn't prove true across the board. Last year I tried to figure out how the city decided to add $105 million to Atlantic Yards subsidies.

At first, I was stonewalled. Then I didn't get a real answer.

In City Limits, Jarrett Murphy reports on the Bloomberg administration's very mixed record regarding transparency:
Over the past eight years, Bloomberg's City Hall has put an unprecedented amount of public information online. Most agencies have become more accessible to the press, even if getting city officials on the phone can be difficult.

But some parts of the Bloomberg administration—some of the rooms in the house—are as or more impenetrable as they were under Giuliani. And according to watchdogs, researchers and reporters, gaining access to some agencies' documents through the Freedom of Information Law has been unjustifiably difficult.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…