Skip to main content

The ESDC still hasn't shared the KPMG report; on video, lawyer explains how AY "timeline" may be longer than ten-year "timetable"

A dozen business days after September 17, when the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) approved the 2009 Modified General Project Plan, the ESDC has still not released the KPMG report that provided the basis that a ten-year timetable for the project is "not unreasonable."

In a brief press conference after the board meeting, as shown in the video below, ESDC Senior Counsel Steve Matlin said that the ESDC would look at the issue of releasing the report "in the next few days."

Also in the interview, Matlin said he could not describe potential penalties facing Forest City Ratner if it didn't meet the project timetable because the issue was still under negotiation.

And he acknowledged a tension between a project timeline would last well beyond ten years, but an official timetable of a decade "that we expect to achieve, we want to achieve."

The official word

According to a memo to the ESDC board:
Corporation staff has regularly reviewed the financial projections for the project to ensure that the Project remains viable as economic conditions change. In addition, the Corporation has retained the services of KPMG to perform a limited up-date of the analysis that it performed in 2006 based on the prior iteration of the Modified General Project Plan. Corporation staff and KPMG believe that the Project remains viable and that the project schedule is achievable based on existing and projected economic conditions.

The interview




The video begins with ESDC Senior Counsel Steve Matlin explaining to WNYC's Matthew Schuerman that "We think ten years is a reasonable period."

I and the Daily News's Erin Durkin (whose story never ran) try to follow up, and ESDC spokesman Warner Johnston tries to keep some order.

"Can you explain, did the KPMG report respond specifically to the Joshua Kahr report?" I asked. (The Kahr report, submitted by the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods (CBN), argued that the ten-year timetable was unrealistic.)

"The KPMG report was commissioned before we--certainly before I saw the Kahr report," Matlin said. "We did share it with KPMG. To what extent they looked at it and--they certainly didn't respond to it directly, but I'm sure they looked at it."

He gave a verbal shrug: "Different opinions."

"Can we get a copy of that KPMG report?" I asked.

"The KPMG report was provided to the directors on a privileged and confidential basis and, quite frankly, we're looking at now whether we can release the document," Matlin responded. "We may have to redact a portion. There could be some proprietary information. So we haven't reached that decision, but we're going to look at it in the next few days."

Timing questions

Durkin asked about penalties for not fulfilling the timeline for the first two buildings as well as Phase 2, the 11 towers east of Sixth Avenue.

"There are penalties," Matlin responded. "We're still negotiating. We don't have final lease agreements. There are still ongoing negotiations. So I'm not sure I want to state right here what those penalties are going to be. But we do have a general understanding of penalties and timeline."

Does that apply to all the buildings? (There were no penalties regarding Phase 2 in the September 2007 State Funding Agreement.)

"There is going to be a timeline for Phase 2," Matlin replied. "The timeline, which people have pointed out, is going to be well beyond ten years, but there are incentives for the developer to build out the project in a much more expeditious way. And that's why we think the ten years is doable. What people are having a problem understanding, which I can understand, is that there's the timetable that we expect to achieve, we want to achieve, and then there's a timetable for when remedies kick in. And the reason for that is, notwithstanding the wishes of ESDC and the wishes of Forest City, it may take longer. And we recognize that and they recognize that."

There may be incentives to build the project faster, and there are carrying costs. Then again, Forest City Ratner has 22 years to pay the Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the rest of the Vanderbilt Yard, at a generous interest rate.

So the only way to meet the ten-year timetable would be to pay off that mortgage, so to speak, well ahead of time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.