Skip to main content

"Reborn Into Wholeness": hyping Nassau Coliseum in China to immigrant investors seeking green cards (hockey!)

Third of a five-part series on Forest City Ratner's plans for Nassau Coliseum redevelopment. 

Part 1 concerned the overall plan. Part 2 addressed the curious politics of a Community Benefits Agreement. This addresses the astonishing pitch in China for EB-5 investment. Part 4 discussed Forest City's claim, at the Nassau County Legislature, it wasn't making much profit on EB-5, and its defense of a sketchy fundraising partner. Part 5 concerned the brazen effort by EB-5 promoters to use an excerpt from this blog.

In August 2013, when Forest City Ratner's Nassau Events Center team won the bid to revamp the Nassau Coliseum in a deal purported to be  "100% privately financed," I asked "where's the catch?"

It turns out there are several.

The EB-5 promotion began last August
We've since learned that Forest City will get to market naming rights for the arena. The developer will benefit from a state-funded parking facility.

And Forest City has since unveiled a new way to raise more than one-third of total funding: $90 million in low-interest loans expected from 180 immigrant investors more concerned with green cards than any financial return.

That should save tens of millions of dollars, given the typical spread between conventional financing and financing under the EB-5 program, which allows entrepreneurs to hawk green cards if they can show on paper--not a big burden--that each $500,000 investment "creates" 10 jobs.

EB-5 promoter Nicholas Mastroianni on left
EB-5 effort: "Reborn into Wholeness"

That surfaced only in late March, because Forest City had to revise its lease with Nassau County.

Actually, Forest City and its partners have been pitching the project in China since last August--as noted in the screenshots, the first of several recruitment seminars in hotel ballrooms across China.

As with many EB-5 project, the promotion, on the web (from the Qiao Wai migration agency) and during events, has been long on glitz, short on details.

In China, the plan was hyped as "Reborn into Wholeness," as shown at the launch event Beijing last August. That came was some unintended irony.

The hockey deception

It featured kids in hockey uniforms, a misleading choice, given that major league hockey, however much it has defined the Nassau Coliseum, is moving to the Barclays Center in Brooklyn later this year. It's hard to consider the Coliseum "whole" when it's losing its main tenant.

The promotional material for the EB-5 investment has described the Coliseum as the historic home of the Islanders but not--as far as I can tell--explained the New York Islanders are leaving for Brooklyn.

If that's consistently obscured, that's par for the course. As immigration attorney Jose Latour wrote in March 2014, though not addressing this specific case:
Over the past three years and my dozens of trips to East Asia, I have witnessed what I can only describe as a pandemic of hype-driven EB-5 marketing, particularly in China, which operates not only in flagrant disregard of both U.S. and local securities laws, but in flagrant disregard of fundamental principles of fair dealing and business integrity. Many - not all but many - Chinese migration agents base their forceful "buy" recommendations not on the underlying integrity of the EB-5 project and its principals but on the size of the "success" fee offered. 
And, as is obvious from the screenshots and associated web page, the Nassau Coliseum hype is produced in partnership with the U.S. Immigration Fund, the sketchy regional center (private investment pool) authorized to raise money under EB-5, as well as Forest City Ratner.

Along with Qiao Wai, they have deceptively promoted the EB-5 investment in Atlantic Yards, for example suggesting that a U.S. State Department official endorsed the project. It's hard to imagine they'd dial back for this project.

Mock news predictions

Indeed, note the creative and deceptive mock-up newspaper and magazine covers--part of the pitch from an immigration broker--excerpted from the Qiao Wai web site.

They predict the arena would re-open with Billy Joel. That's not impossible; he's closing the arena.

But they also predict the Coliseum would be named the 2016 new facility of the year. That's bogus, since the arena won't reopen until December 2016 at best.

The event video

Note this brief video from the opening event last August. It layers hip-hop music over a ceremonial puck drop, then segues into a stirringly passionate video montage of Nassau Coliseum excitement.

It confirms the observation by Fortune's Peter Elkind that "EB-5 fundraising is a messy process, more like pitching vacation timeshares than any normal form of deal finance." In other words, focus on the glitz, not the financial soundness or the plan to repay investors.

It's surely easy to do this when there's a language and cultural barrier.

The web page for the EB-5 promotion includes, at right, photos from that opening event.

(Apparently Charles Gargano, the former head of the Empire State Development Corporation, was not promoting the Nassau Coliseum at that event, but he has done so, on behalf of the U.S. Immigration Fund.)

Ratner's hype video

The Qiao Wai web site also includes "Welcome to the Future of Nassau," a video filmed mainly in Brooklyn, it seems, aimed at potential immigrant investors.

"Presented by the Team That Brought Barclays Arena To Life," it states, citing Forest City Ratner, SHoP, and Gensler, the latter not actually involved in the Barclays Center.

"Nassau Coliseum: Past Present & Future," it declares, and Bruce Ratner speaks: "The future project really starts with the existing project: Barclays Center arena. We built the Barclays Center arena and it was built using EB-5 money in part, and it turned out to be one of the best arenas in the world. In fact, it's first in ticket sales in the whole United States and first in revenue, and second in the world, it's beautiful, and it's won every single possible award."

Let's unpack that.

It wasn't built "using EB-5 money in part," unless you count EB-5 money replacing a land loan. Even the marketer of the EB-5 loan agreed the money wouldn't go into an arena.

Ratner's statements were taped last year before we learned that the Barclays Center did not have a stellar 2014, or that the high level of ticket sales/revenues does not translate into profit.

"So after that, we decided there's another great place in this area. It's on Long Island, which is about 25 miles away from Barclays Center, and it's where all the roads come together," Ratner continues. pm tje vodep. "There's three million people that live in that area. There's a very old arena there that was famous at one point. Some of the greatest singers in the world played there."

"Elvis Presley, the Beatles, as well sports teams played there," Ratner states. "A professional basketball team played there. A professional hockey team played there." That's not exactly a huge sell.

That pitch very much fits with the parade of history promoted on the web site marketing EB-5 investments, excerpted at right. That has nothing to do with whether the EB-5 investors will get their money back.

Rivaling Barclays?

"It will rival our Barclays arena," Ratner declares in the video. "It will be known as a great icon, and we will make that one of the great concert venues in the world, and EB-5 funding is the reason that that's possible."

That's quite a statement.

The new design may well be impressive, but that doesn't make it one of the world's great concert venues.

Nor does EB-5 funding make the arena possible. Forest City was already contracted to perform the renovations. EB-5 funding is what delivers the returns Ratner desires. Nassau County approved the deal before there was an inkling--at least publicly--of EB-5 funding. (Surely Ratner had the idea in mind.)

Then Ratner claims, as he has when hosted by credulous interviewers, and as he's done in previous EB-5 videos--that "whatever I do has to have a social value," which means creating employment, creating homes, or creating economic development.

Those of course are broad categories; after all, strip mining creates employment.

Support from Nassau

The video goes on to tout "OVERWHELMING GOVERNMENT SUPPORT" and quotes Nassau County Executive Ed Mangano: "Today we stand here with a resounding Long Island yes, yes for a world-class Coliseum..."

The video closes with Ratner saying that people would say about Forest City that "they get it done; we finish things. And that's very important that is very important to all the people in EB-5, that we do what we say. We have a real track record."

That track record includes revising deal regularly, as well.

More hype

As this 8/21/14 China Daily article stated, according to a machine translation, "Project has not yet officially released the internal pre-subscription rate has reached 30 percent, described as highly anticipated!" That's a way to gin up interest.

It also highlighted the Islanders: "As the home of New York's famous ice hockey team, the Long Island stadium also hosted thousands of dollars each type of athletic competition, the world's top star concerts and numerous important exhibitions" or "they can already foresee the New York Islanders brilliant prospects stadium reconstruction project!"

New York-based EB-5 attorney Mona Shah reported 3/30.15 from the Guangdong Entry and Exit Immigration Association's annual Investment Immigration Project Exhibit, held at the Sofitel Hotel in Guangzhou. Wrote Shah and her partner:
Over 100 immigration agencies from Guangdong and around Southern China attended the event. MSA had the privilege of being the only EB-5 immigration firm from the U.S. attending and presenting at this exclusive exhibition, showcasing only a handful of investment projects from around the world.
Investment projects included projects from Malaysia, Cyprus, Portugal, with the majority of exhibitors and presentations coming from the U.S. The EB-5 projects were an interesting mix – ranging from large, glamourous real estate projects to small direct pooled projects. The projects included Mount Snow, introducing the West Lake Water project and Carinthia Ski Lodge, through the Vermont Regional Center. U.S. Immigration Fund gave a glamorous introduction to their latest project — renovating the Nassau Coliseum in Long Island, New York, on similar lines to the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York.
The hype worked the first time, in part because there has been little journalistic nor government scrutiny. It seems to be working again.

Below are PDFs of the Qiao Wai web site in case it disappears. It's already been updated.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…