Skip to main content

Hello Nassau: Ratner wins bid to revamp Coliseum in "100% privately financed" deal (where's the catch?)

Rendering by SHoP of revamped Coliseum; don't be
surprised to see new signage for sponsorships
Hello Nassau?

On paper--at least the paper we've seen--it sure looks like the bid by a Bruce Ratner-led team to revamp and downsize the creaky Nassau Coliseum looks like a better deal for Nassau County, which announced yesterday that Ratner's Nassau Events Center (NEC) had bested a proposal by Madison Square Garden.

Over 34 years, NEC would pay a minimum of $194.5 million rent, versus $112.1 million by MSG. (Newsday reported that the Coliseum's current finances were a wash, given that rent and concession revenue were offset by maintenance costs.)

All good for the taxpayer?

So this seems far better than the plans to replace the Coliseum with a new building, a process rejected by taxpayers, though it did cost the arena its main tenant, the New York Islanders, which is moving to Brooklyn no later than the 2015-16 season.

Even so, I have to wonder when Nassau County Executive Ed Mangano yesterday announced "a historic public-private partnership... a 100% privately financed Coliseum that will share revenue with the County at zero expense to the taxpayer."

After all, Atlantic Yards was supposed to be "almost exclusively privately financed." Subsidies and tax breaks are in considerable--the New York City Independent Budget Office calculated that Forest City Ratner would save $726 million. (That number was inflated by a then-larger sum for arena bonds, but it left out additional government aid, such as in getting EB-5 financing, or free land)

So the Nassau deal could include government aid that doesn't show up as a direct subsidy. Newsday reported "phased-in payments in lieu of taxes from new restaurants and entertainment options surrounding the Coliseum." Payments in lieu of taxes can mean a benefit for the payer, such as the lower rate on tax-exempt bonds for the Brooklyn arena.

Also, as with Atlantic Yards, the Nassau Coliseum deal could include significant renegotiation down the line. Remember, Bruce Ratner, in the Times's words, has a "reputation for promising anything to get a deal, only to renegotiate relentlessly for more favorable terms."

Also, I'd bet that the Coliseum exterior, however elegantly pristine in the renderings produced by Barclays Center facade-meisters SHoP, will be enhanced by sponsorships and naming rights. No, there's no direct cost to the county in giving Ratner naming rights to sell, but it's an asset that should be part of a cost benefit analysis--though that was not done so regarding the Brooklyn arena.

County rationale

Mangano said:
NEC will invest a minimum of $229 Million in renovating the Coliseum and the Plaza to create a first class destination. During the initial 34 year lease term, Nassau County will receive 8% of gross revenue, 12.75% of parking fees with a minimum guaranteed payment of $4 Million a year escalating by 10% every five years, resulting in a minimum lease term payment of $195 Million to the County. With options exercised, the minimum lease payment grows to $334 Million. Similarly, the Plaza area, now concrete, will be transformed and will generate the greater of $400,000 a year in rent or 8% of the gross revenue. In addition, Nassau County maintains rights for future development on the site.
Among the points recommended by the county's RFP Committee:
  • NEC will pay for Coliseum maintenance after the current lease expires on August 1, 2015, relieving the county from such expenses.
  • NEC will pay rent during the preconstruction approvals period and the actual construction period, allowing the county to gain $2 million "while shedding millions in expenses."
  • NEC pledged a minimum annual rent of $4.4 million, or $1.4 million more than MSG’s proposal, with a 10% increase ever five years, rather than MSG's proposed 5% every five years. 
  • NEC's rent is calculated based on 8% gross revenues yielded by both the Coliseum and Plaza Improvements plus 12.75% of parking revenue, while MSG would add $1.50 per ticket sold.
  • Under the NEC proposal, the County retains control over any future development of the Coliseum site.
Today comes the second announcement: "exciting programming."

At the press conference yesterday, Mangano said there'd been no discussion about the New York Islanders breaking their lease and moving to the Barclays Center before the scheduled Fall 2015 date. He said it was "not contemplated in the contract."

Dueling proposals

As Newsday described the proposals:
Ratner's $229-million proposal calls for a renovated 13,000-seat arena, a 2,000-seat indoor theater, an outdoor amphitheater, restaurants, an ice-skating rink and retail space. The Islanders would play a combination of six regular or preseason games at the renovated Coliseum.
Ratner is working with Syosset-based developer Ed Blumenfeld; Guggenheim Partners, a financial services firm; entertainment company Live Nation; Roc Nation, the holding company of entertainer Jay Z; and Legends, the food and beverage company owned in part by the New York Yankees.
MSG's $250 million proposal called for a renovated 14,500-seat arena and an entertainment complex with restaurants, bowling, billiards and an Islanders-themed sports bar.
MSG was partnering with Baltimore-based development firm Cordish Cos. and Uniondale-based RXR Realty, headed by Scott Rechler.
Field of Schemes' Neil deMause wondered if it would work:
But anyway, Forest City Ratner will indeed be the Nassau Coliseum developers, which means it’s going to be their problem how to figure out to make over an arena with no anchor sports tenant and hefty competition from the Garden, the Prudential Center (now with less feeble owner), and, yes, Barclays. It’s conceivable that FCR will try to bundle its two arena properties somehow to offer something that the other local arenas can’t, but unless that’s “We won’t book you into Brooklyn unless you play your second local night on Long Island,” I’m not sure what that’d be.
That's not implausible. Some touring acts might otherwise choose MSG or New Jersey, but if they get the right deal for Long Island, they'd do it.

As for today's announcement, I wouldn't be surprised if Jay-Z is a part of it, or at least mentioned. No, he's not a Long Islander, but his star power continues to grow.

Reaction: NEC and MSG

“We are grateful to be selected to revitalize Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum,” Forest City Ratner boss Bruce Ratner said in a statement. "We understand and proudly accept the tremendous responsibility that accompanies this project and the impact it has on future generations of Long Islanders."

"We are ready to get to work to deliver a world-class Coliseum and a thriving sports, entertainment and retail center that Long Island deserves. Our partnership group is focused and prepared to bring the best to Nassau and to fulfill the County’s goals of vital job growth and significant economic activity. It is time for Nassau County to have an iconic and celebrated venue that will have something for everyone to enjoy and which will redefine the customer experience."

MSG hinted at Ratner's inside track, given the developer's role in helping Nassau on the RFP: “While we are disappointed with the County’s decision, we are not at all surprised given the history of this project, and will be watching closely as this process moves to the County Legislature. We continue to believe that Madison Square Garden’s proposal, expertise and proven track record represent the best and most realistic opportunity to revitalize the Nassau Coliseum."

Then again, a good number of Long Islanders believed that Mangano would go with MSG, given that the same owners own the dominant local newspaper, Newsday. So we'll see if MSG tries to block the process in the legislature.


  1. I get your site does not like Ratner, all well and good but you have to point out Newsday's omissions on campaign financing to defeat Ratner in the bid, not just parrot their coverage as if it's honest.

    Newsday Omission in Story on Owner’s Rival Raises Questions

    “It is an error, and highly suspect,” Jaci Clement, executive director of Bethpage-based Fair Media Council, a local media watchdog group, said of the omission in the Aug. 7 article titled “Forest City’s political spending.”

    “The whole product clearly screams who the owner is, and that it’s meant to be little more than a marketing vehicle for what it has to sell,” she said of Newsday‘s coverage since Cablevision took over. “And that may include seats at Nassau Coliseum.”

    1. I used Newsday's boilerplate description of the project, didn't rely heavily on it.

      I'm well aware of that LI Press criticism and agree w/it. I'd planned to mention it--and had in a shell article, unpublished (though you may not believe me).

      I also read Kevin Schultz's piece noting Cablevision's political spending.

      I trust MSG no more than I trust Ratner.

  2. Mr Oder,

    Why would I not believe you? I posted that link before you because I wanted you to see it.

    It's not Msg, it's James Dolan. That man almost won the bid and never left his house. I'm shocked he didn't.

    My friend, Lighthouse hockey is a box set of blogger at SB Nation, written by a self-serving phony who only links to articles named Dominik Jansky from St Louis, who has no contacts to anyone. The Islanders have major media coverage problems so I get people like to garbage, but that hurts your product here going with that.

    Kevin Schultz (from folded AOL Fanhouse) is the latest Chris Botta replacement, who like Botta is terrified of Dolan's media. No professional site would have him.

    Whatever I think of Dolan's Newday, and granted the LI Press or LI Business don't have staff/money to do a proper job fully researching, don't link to amateur self-serving fan bloggers like Jansky or Schultz.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…