Skip to main content

A national spotlight: libertarian watchdog group targets Forest City Enterprises for "political profiteering"; while report goes over the top, Forest City's defense is too pat

I have a rather mixed response to the report issued yesterday by Cause of Action, a self-described nonpartisan Washington watchdog group that aims "to protect economic opportunity when federal regulations, spending, and cronyism threaten it."

(Given the "economic opportunity" line, and the leadership of Dan Epstein, a former staffer at the Koch Foundation and for House Republicans, I'd describe the organization as libertarian, though they don't use that term.)

While I think it's valuable to shine a spotlight on a little-known but quite powerful company, I don't find the numbers convincing, and I recognize that such strategic spending on campaign contributions and lobbying is not uncommon.

Still, I don't think Forest City's defense is fully credible and Cause of Action--which plans additional sections--is likely to point out how the developer did not deliver on promises for project benefits in places like Brooklyn and Washington.

I'm not sure that can clearly be blamed on lobbying and campaign contributions, but when elected officials like the governor and mayor get behind a project, like Atlantic Yards, the developer has the upper hand when agencies controlled by those officials (MTA, ESDC) are asked to renegotiate settled deals.

There's a lesson here: protecting the public requires much vigilance.

Numbers too pat?

According to the article yesterday in the New York Post, Barclays builder ‘pay to play’ (which relies on the report's simplistic executive summary):
Forest City Enterprises, the real-estate behemoth whose subsidiary built the Barclays Center, has taken pay-to-play to new levels, an explosive new report charges.
The company has gotten indirect government subsidies totaling $2.6 billion over the last decade — or 23 percent of its $11.4 billion in revenues over the period, according to the report.
That's way too conclusory, because, for example, subsidies like tax breaks are delivered over decades and can't be attributed to the current bottom line unless treated as "present value." In fact, the Cause of Action report notes that the New York City Independent Budget Office calculated that the arena would be  $40 million net loss for the city--a figure that does derive from more subtle calculations (even though some of the numbers need adjustment).

Also, a footnote in the full report says subsidies include the "full value of tax-exempt bonds as opposed to only calculating savings on interest." That doesn't make sense. That would mean that Forest City Ratner would be credited with full $511 million values of the Atlantic Yards arena bonds rather than the $150 million or so saved on interest.

Though such calculations surely overstate benefits, at the same time the report does not tote up all the fiscal benefits gained through government assistance, such as low-cost loans to Forest City Ratner through the EB-5 immigrant investor program, which city and state officials promoted (at no cost other than travel and reputation).

Nor does it include the value of naming rights to the Barclays Center, which the state simply gave away, though the arena is nominally owned by the public.

So it's safe to say that Forest City Enterprises and its subsidiaries, including Forest City Ratner, have become very good at getting subsidies, and it's part of their business plan.

Remember how then-CEO Chuck Ratner in April 2008 said "We still need more" subsidy, and Forest City Ratner got it? Or how the New York Times last September described Bruce Ratner's "reputation for promising anything to get a deal, only to renegotiate relentlessly for more favorable terms"?

Cause and effect

It's also simplistic to suggest that Forest City's considerable spending on campaign contributions and lobbying directly delivers subsidies and government assistance.

“For far too long, Forest City Enterprises has operated on the model of political profiteering, essentially rigging the marketplace by paying off government officials with lavish campaign contributions and gambling with taxpayer funds for its private profit,” Cause of Action's Epstein told the Post.

After all, Mayor Mike Bloomberg, when he said, "I want to get it done" after being shown plans for Atlantic Yards, didn't need cash to be convinced, or to later increase subsidies for Forest City (though the developer's later donation to the Mayor's Fund to Advance the City of New York surely didn't hurt).

Then again, consider the Ridge Hill case in Yonkers, where it sure looked like Forest City Ratner was engaged in pay-to-play, though the developer escaped sanction.

Forest City's response

Forest City's response was a wee bit defensive and self-righteous. In the New York Post:
Forest City spokesman Jeff Linton said, “It should come as no surprise that we support candidates whose policies promote economic development and job creation. However, to suggest or imply a direct connection between this support and our opportunities as a company is baseless and defamatory.”
He said without government development incentives, most of the company’s development projects “would not be economically viable.”
Forest City spokesman Jeff Linton called the report "absurd." He said Forest City's activities are no different from that of other corporations. He said it's not surprising that the company's political donations would go to "candidates who support economic development urban policies and job creation, and it shouldn't surprise anybody that we have focused our giving on the markets where we have offices and activity."
"We are being criticized for participating in our democracy in a way that is transparent, above board and adheres to all the rules," Linton said.
Multiple strategies

Well, as Cause of Action demonstrates, the political contributions seem well-coordinated beyond simply philosophical support for economic development. (I'll write more about that finding shortly.)

And, if Forest City Ratner was were completely transparent and above-board, wouldn't they have hired the promised Independent Compliance Monitor for the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement?

It's fair to say that Forest City Enterprises and Forest City Ratner use multiple strategies to win friends and influence people, including campaign contributions, lobbying, and more.

The latter appears to include the hiring of people connected to key supporters, such as Nets scout Khalid Green, the son of then-Assemblyman Roger Green, or Michael Rapfogel, whose parents are, respectively, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's chief of staff and his close friend.

The business model

According to the Cause of Action report:
The FCE business model is dependent upon political profiteering: relying on public money and government influence to reap millions in profit. Using highly paid lobbyists, political connections, campaign contributions, and strategic hiring of government officials, FCE obtains lavish public subsidies, tax-exempt financing and the seizure of private land from eminent domain condemnations.
That's part of it, but if it were that simple, everyone would do it. And they do, more or less, though not always as successfully. Lots of real estate developers spend money on campaign contributions and lobbying, though arguably Forest City pushes the envelope (see: Ridge Hill).

Forest City brings significant expertise to the table, so those political officials can say, plausibly, that they're entering into a win-win "public-private partnership," even if it turns into a "private-public partnership."

Going forward

According to the executive summary:
In the reports that follow, resulting from Cause of Action’s twenty-four investigation, CoA will show how FCE took public benefits under the premise of providing jobs for minority workers but failed to deliver as well as how FCE enriched itself through bribery and political graft, without ever being subject to investigation or oversight.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …