Skip to main content

Front-page New York Times profile of Bruce Ratner buries the lead: "promising anything to get a deal, only to renegotiate relentlessly for more favorable terms"

A front-page New York Times profile of Bruce Ratner, headlined Nets Helped Clear Path for Builder in Brooklyn, contains enough criticism (and one new revelation about Ratner tactics) to avoid being a puff piece, but it barely touches on all the reasons for criticism.

But what if the article had proceeded from the observation lower down in the article, regarding "his reputation for promising anything to get a deal, only to renegotiate relentlessly for more favorable terms"? That might have led to the Culture of Cheating.

Ratner claims “We’ve kept every single promise we’ve ever made,” which is simply a lie. Consider two self-sabotaging--if rather little-noticed--statements:
  • he repudiated the ten-year timeline to build the project previously endorsed by his company and the state
  • he claimed that high-rise, union-built affordable housing isn't feasible, even though that's what he long planned and the state approved twice
Leading off

The article begins by describing the strategic purchase of the Nets:
“So, how did we get here?” Mr. Ratner asked last week, almost giddy, at the ribbon cutting of the nation’s most expensive basketball arena, the Barclays Center. “We first needed to buy a basketball team, and against all odds we did it.”
That acknowledgment highlights a characteristic that emerged again and again over the past nine years: Mr. Ratner, one of the most prominent and polarizing figures in real-estate-mad New York, may portray himself as a reluctant developer, but he will do what is necessary to get a deal done.
“By nature he’s a very generous guy,” said Stuart Pertz, an architect who worked for Mr. Ratner in the 1980s but opposed his arena project. “Once he’s in business, he deals with the business at hand.”
Now I don't know the context of Pertz's quote, but Ratner is only generous when he needs to be, for business reasons.

His company never hired the Independent Compliance Monitor required under the "historic" Community Benefits Agreement. It tried to get out of paying for trees that were removed. It tried to get more city subsidies for affordable housing and plans to cut costs by using modular construction. It consistently flouted rules regarding construction practices to get the arena done in a tight time frame.

And, as the article indicates, Forest City renegotiates whenever possible.

Bait and switch?

The article states:
Since the inception of the Atlantic Yards project in 2003, Mr. Ratner, 67, has revised his plans and timelines so often that critics say the whole thing amounts to an enormous bait and switch. He has spent millions lobbying politicians and donating to civic groups to smooth the way. He persisted through lawsuits, protests, financial problems and the chilling doubts of his relatives. His supporters laud his vision, saying it promises local jobs and affordable housing and creates a new center of gravity in Brooklyn. His critics, citing many of the same facts, deride him for overrunning the neighborhood with a Manhattan-size behemoth.
This is "he-said, she-said" with a twist. First, the promises of local jobs and affordable housing have, in fact, too often been talking points than actual results. And the "same facts" lead not so much to concerns about a "Manhattan-size behemoth" but concern about what I call the Culture of Cheating.

On Friday, Mr. Ratner will find some measure of vindication as the glass-and-rusted-steel home of the rechristened Brooklyn Nets — situated at the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues — opens with a week of concerts by Jay-Z, whom he recruited to buy a tiny stake in the team.

Grumbling residents?

The article notes:
Though groundbreaking on the first of those buildings is scheduled for November, already 18 months behind schedule, neighborhood residents grumble that the area is destined to remain a construction zone in perpetuity.
Why shouldn't they grumble? Forest City kept saying it would take a decade. Then the state agency overseeing the project, Empire State Development (ESD), withheld the Development Agreement that gave Forest City 25 years, and the developer and ESD ultimately lost a lawsuit requiring a Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement. That goes unmentioned in this article.

Ratner winding down?

The article suggests that Ratner "may be winding down his career," as he has "no other major developments in the pipeline," though I'm not sure that trying to complete Atlantic Yards--and launching a potentially transformative modular business (also unmentioned) is "winding down.".

Keeping promises

The article states:
In a recent interview, Mr. Ratner acknowledged that Atlantic Yards had been “the most difficult, bruising development project I’ve done, or could even imagine doing.” He bristled at the criticism and lamented the damage that critics had inflicted to his reputation, insisting that he had always sought to “make something wonderful and terrific.”
“We’ve kept every single promise we’ve ever made,” he said. “We’ve built the arena. They said we’d never build it. And I’m going to build the affordable housing.”
Not so, as noted above.

His new mantra, apparently, is "they said we'd never build" the arena. No one ever counted that as a promise. Rather, he promised, "Jobs, Housing, and Hoops." He got rid of the office jobs, plans to cut down the construction jobs, fudged about the arena jobs, etc. Culture of Cheating.

Obligatory "neighborhood critics"

The article states:
“Mr. Ratner portrays himself as a liberal do-gooder type, but this is as phony as the arena’s rust,” said Candace Carpentor, a spokeswoman for Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn, one of the groups representing residents of the surrounding neighborhoods.
“He garnered political support and taxpayer favors with the promise of huge benefits, including 2,250 affordable-housing units and 10,000 permanent jobs. But the only benefit we have received is a traffic-choking, noise-generating, taxpayer-money-losing white elephant and acres of vacant lots where a thriving, multiethnic community once stood.”
He said, she said.

Bruce the liberal

The article takes the conventional view of stating that Ratner "has held onto his liberal politics," ignoring the fact that he plays hardball when it counts, contributing, for example, to New York state Senate Republicans.

The article mentions Ratner's history of public-private partnerships, his vision in recognizing big box retail in the boroughs, his work on Times Square, and describes the "busy, fortresslike collection of shopping malls" near the arena "that he built in the 1990s" (actually, just one) simply via this quote: “People thought they’d be a failure." (What about "the ugliest building in Brooklyn"?)


The article states that "the criticism is rarely as fierce as it has been with Mr. Ratner over the Atlantic Yards project," adding:
Initially, his plan to move the Nets from New Jersey to a Brooklyn railyard and surround it with thousands of apartments garnered effusive support from Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Gov. George E. Pataki, who helped clear the way for the use of eminent domain and provided $305 million in grants. Mr. Ratner formed an alliance with housing and community groups, some of which he financed. He was also among the biggest spenders in the state on lobbying politicians.
He promised 10,000 office jobs--not merely apartments--and 15,000 construction jobs.

As for the "alliance," that's the Community Benefits Agreement--and he financed all of those groups.

So maybe the criticism had some merit.

Changing plans

Here's the toughest paragraph:
His willingness to change plans — abandoning an expensive Frank Gehry design and building a smaller railyard — solidified his reputation for promising anything to get a deal, only to renegotiate relentlessly for more favorable terms. In separate encounters in meetings over the Atlantic Yards project, Mr. Ratner loudly berated Rafael E. Cestero, then the housing commissioner, and Seth W. Pinsky, president of the city’s Economic Development Corporation, after not getting his way.
Shouldn't this be the frame?

Tinged by scandal

The article notes that "Mr. Ratner’s projects surfaced at the edge of political scandals," involving lobbyist Richard Lipsky and Sen. Carl Kruger:
Neither Mr. Ratner nor anyone at his company was charged with wrongdoing, and there was no evidence that he knew of the scheme.
Fair enough, but unmentioned is that Ratner's deputy Bruce Bender asked Kruger for $9 million in state money to relieve the developer's obligation to pay for reconstruction of the Carlton Avenue Bridge.

The article states:
(A few months later, a former Yonkers councilwoman and a political operative were convicted of bribery and extortion in a case involving another Ratner project, the Ridge Hill mall.)
Actually, in the part of the case involving Ridge Hill, the charge was corrupt payments. Unmentioned is that Ratner's deputy Bruce Bender and his deputy Scott Cantone led the political operative, Zehy Jereis, to believe he'd get a no-show job at Forest City as a reward for flipping the councilwoman's vote, and that both Bender and Cantone left the company around the time of the trial.

Chairman Chuck Ratner

The article quotes Ratner's cousin:
“We all feel a great deal of concern over how Bruce has been treated on this and how we as a company have been vilified,” said his cousin, Charles A. Ratner, chairman of Forest City Enterprises, a publicly traded company based in Cleveland. Forest City in New York represents one-third of the company’s assets
“But at the end of the day, if you believe in what you’re doing, you deal with it.”
Chuck Ratner in 2007 candidly said Atlantic Yards would take 15 years, then recovered to claim, not so credibly, that it would take ten years.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…