Skip to main content

On Charlie Rose, uninformed sycophancy redux; host lets Ratner spin, claim arena was gift to Brooklyn, admit working the levers of government "in the traditional way"

TV host Charlie Rose was his sycophantic self in A discussion about the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, 10/1/12. with Karen Brooks Hopkins of BAM, Nets' principal owner Mikhail Prokhorov, his sister Irina Prokhorov, and arena developer Bruce Ratner.

In fact, though Rose was slightly more informed than he was when interviewed arena developer Bruce Ratner last March, his performance was even more embarrassing, since even Rose should have seen some tougher-than-before New York Times coverage. And he still couldn't get the name "Atlantic Yards" right.

He not only let Ratner get away with diminishing neighborhood opposition and claiming the arena was a gift to Brooklyn, Rose asked uninformed, leading questions about public concerns, Ratner's liberalism, and why his subject is misunderstood.

There were a few telling moments, however, in which Ratner contradicted his own words, such as acknowledging how he's "manipulated" (Rose's word) politicians "in the traditional way."

Leading off

"The Barclays Center in Brooklyn has been a dream of developer Bruce Ratner for the last decade," Rose began. "Its much anticipated opening marks the latest step in the revitalization of Brooklyn. It is not without controversy. There have been protests about what development does to neighborhoods."

Actually, the protests go much deeper. Nor has the "Barclays Center" been Ratner's dream, since the naming rights sale was announced only in 2007.

Ratner's dream

Rose led off, "You have been dreaming and dreaming and dreaming..."

"Now it's finally here," Ratner picked it up. "It's been hard and long, but worth it... there was every single impediment, from the recession to 35 litigations to the difficulty of constructing in the city... Also, I was called different names and so on."

35 litigations? I guess he means legal decisions.


(Videos are excerpts as recorded watching the computer.)

"You were called lots of names," the ever-uniformed Rose continued. "Because people didn't know what your intent was. And they worried that what you were promising you weren't going to deliver."

No, that's not why people question Ratner. They question Ratner because he's not trustworthy; as the Times said, he has a "reputation for promising anything to get a deal, only to renegotiate relentlessly for more favorable terms.

"That's true," Ratner said. "They were worried that it wouldn't be attractive... that we wouldn't even do it."

"What's the level of neighborhood protest now" Rose continued, "community activists that still worry that this kind of size will disrupt?"

"The actual strong opposition is relatively small," Ratner said. "I think there was 20 protesters out one day. But it's generally quite small."

And there were 150 protesters at a vigil and march the night before the arena opened.

Brooklyn finished?


Rose raised the cover of New York magazine with a long article about Brooklyn: "The Barclays Center--it's the center of the revitalized Brooklyn, yes?"

"It is," Ratner confirmed. "First of all, where it's located. It's right kind of in the downtown, above 11 subway lines.... As such, it's a place where everybody can go to.... It's got every kind of entertainment.. it's going to be a major major shift in the way people in Brooklyn spend their extra time."

And money.

Wait a sec. The C and the G train are a long walk away, and the D/N/R lines are best reached overground, at Fourth Avenue and Pacific Street.


"Did you know early on that you had to get a sports franchise to make this whole Atlantic project work?" Rose asked, misidentifying the project for the second time. (In March, Rose called the project "Atlantic City Yards.")

Ratner said no. "It actually was the reverse... Marty Markowitz, bless his soul, kept pestering me... so the idea was to get a sports team...  now where do we put them? the best place to put them was where all these subways were, Atlantic Terminal."

Actually, it was Ratner's cousin Chuck who said 9/9/05, "We had finished a whole bunch of office and we completed MetroTech and we didn't have the next great site in Brooklyn. That was one of the reasons we got so aggressive and creative, Bruce and his team did in this Atlantic Yards project. We saw that land sitting there for this last 10 years, realizing it would be a great opportunity if somebody could turn it on."

Rose asked if buying the Nets was an easy deal.

Ratner said no, "because taking them out of New Jersey wasn't easy," as there were three other bidders.

Rose: "You won the bid because you offered the most?"

"That's the usual way, yes," Ratner responded, beaming. That provoked knowing, comfortable chuckles from the others at the table.

Except it's not the usual way when it came to the Vanderbilt Yard, the key piece of public property. Ratner offered $50 million in cash; rival Extell offered $150 million.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, controlled by political appointees, chose to negotiate only with Forest City Ratner. Even if the MTA thought Forest City's overall bid more valuable, as it claimed, why didn't it ask Extell to revise its bid?

About Brooklyn and the arena

Mikhail Prokhorov at one point said, buttering up his new borough, "for me, Brooklyn is like Moscow, multinational, very active, gutsy, so I feel like home."

Ratner called it the best basketball arena in the world: "Transportation, architecture, the way the seating is done.. food.. every aspect was done with the fan in mind."

Prokhorov agreed, and presented Rose with a Nets t-shirt and hat.

What could go wrong?

"So what could go wrong here, Bruce," Rose asked, not so probingly.

"I hope nothing," Ratner replied.

"What worries you," Rose continued. "You're a worrier--a soft-spoken worrier."

(Soft-spoken sometimes, but, as the Times reported, Ratner "loudly berated Rafael E. Cestero, then the housing commissioner, and Seth W. Pinsky, president of the city’s Economic Development Corporation, after not getting his way.")



"I guess, I'm worried about traffic a little bit, even though everybody had better take public transportation," Ratner continued. "There's always issues of safety.. everybody's looking at us.. it's really all the attention we've gotten, which means that anything that doesn't go right is going to be magnified."

Brooklyn's soul

"It is, I assume, to make sure that none of this causes Brooklyn to lose Brooklyn, to be what it is," Rose pontificated. "I mean, if you have the definition of something that has soul, you want to make sure that nothing gets in the way of that soul."

He looked toward Ratner.

"That's really it," Ratner affirmed, "and y'know something, throughout all of this, that was very critical, whether it be the food or everything, how do we continue the soul of Brooklyn? That's not easy to define, the soul of Brooklyn--

"--so it doesn't look like Brooklyn has been bought," Rose continued.

"That's correct," Ratner affirmed. "That is correct."

Wait a sec. Even Atlantic Yards supporter Steve Hindy of the Brooklyn Brewery told the Observer that he couldn't get his product out front at Barclays because others were paying more for sponsorship.

Other voices

Rose turned to Prokhorov: "You're smiling--do you think I'm right or wrong?"

"I think the Barclays Center is in keeping with the spirit of Brooklyn," the oligarch replied. "It's very energetic, it's passion, y'know, if you look at history, there were a lot of claims to change urban landscapes."

He suggested it was "just a matter of years and years" until the Barclays Center is considered an integral part of the landscape, not unlike the Eiffel Tower in Paris.

"You can't imagine New York without Central Park.... or the Empire State Building," Rose continued..

Brooks Hopkins observed, "I would say that Brooklyn today sort of represents the urban energy of 21st century New York City. "Our audience is very young, very diverse, they're ready to be challenged... I think that's sort of the vibe and whole attitude of Brooklyn. So the sports, the culture, everything that's happening sort of fits together right now. It's the Brooklyn moment."

"In other words, you want people, when they think New York, to think Brooklyn," Rose responded.

"Yeah," said Brooks Hopkins. "And I think people are thinking Brooklyn, because of all of this energy we are talking about. Because there is all this edge and attitude that is Brooklyn. And I think BAM has been a large part of driving that revitalization."

Misunderstood Ratner

About two-thirds of the way in, Rose tossed a big softball to Ratner: "What's the biggest misconception about you, that you would people like to know is simply not true?"



"You ask very good questions," Ratner replied, buttering up his interviewer. "I think that, this idea that the intent was to do really something great for Brooklyn, it really was. It was not economic, it was not all this, it was to try and do something great for Brooklyn."

That, of course, is why he renegotiates deals so often and why he wanted to build a "airplane hangar" arena before public outcry changed his plans. (And why water at the arena costs $4.50 and soda $5.)

"I love Brooklyn. I've been working in Brooklyn for 25 years, chairman of BAM for ten years, I like every aspect of Brooklyn," Ratner continued, in an exercise of hyperbole. "So that was the idea. On the other hand, it's been described that I had all these other motives.. That's really, I think, been the biggest."

"You had to do all kinds of things to get there," Rose said with a smile, and a nudge toward reality. "A lot of roadblocks, you had to manipulate politicians."

"That's another thing. We did it in the traditional way in which large projects are done," Ratner replied, with a smile and a shrug. (That would mean lobbying and political contributions.)

Just last August Ratner told the Wall Street Journal, on video, "When you work with government, it's heavily on a staff level. It's really more about working on a staff level. On that level, we work in a very unpolitical way. We work just on the merits."

Family business/liberalism

Ratner told Rose that "occasionally it was very difficult" to present his plans to the family-controlled Forest City Enterprises. "And of course, they're not from New York... when you see litigations, the kind of noise, it was not easy."

"You always have been a liberal politically," Rose said, missing the point, "but people say, he's a liberal, but he's in real estate development?"

"The day I started in real estate development, I said I'd only do real estate development if it had a civic purpose, or employment," Ratner said. "And every project I've done I've attempted to do that."

But "civic" is a weasel word, encompassing a large number of things. I thought Ratner left public service and the non-profit world to go into business so he could make more money to raise his children, as he's said.

In closing

Rose said at the end, "Brooklyn has had a romance around it for a long, long time... you will see that it is a place that has a firm foundation to build something new, and that is what is taking place today."

Comments

  1. Big Bird? Mitt Romney should fire Charlie Rose.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.