Skip to main content

Ravitch Commission says (if you read between the lines): Don’t do deals like Atlantic Yards

The big news yesterday out of the Commission on Metropolitan Transportation Authority Financing, led by Richard Ravitch, concerned proposals for a“mobility tax” on payrolls; tolls on now-free bridges; and a much smaller fare increase than feared.

However, reading between the lines, the Ravitch Commission, appointed in June by New York Governor David Paterson, also seems to be questioning the MTA’s stewardship of the Atlantic Yards deal, calling for a reform in governance and an increase in transparency.

AY in 2005

Remember, the MTA made a controversial September 2005 decision to negotiate solely with developer Forest City Ratner, which had offered $50 million in cash, though rival developer Extell bid $150 million, for a parcel appraised for the MTA at $214.5 million, inclusive of the cost of a platform.

Forest City Ratner contended its bid was worth far more, and its bid did promise $29 million in mass transit improvements (aka a new subway entrance), not part of the Extell bid, which was far less elaborate, given that the rival had a far more limited time to prepare.

Then again, Extell was apparently including the cost of a platform in its $150 million bid, thus boosting the total value over $200 million, while FCR contended that the platform it would build was worth an additional $99 million.

Note that the MTA’s appraisal said a platform should cost $56.7 million, so that was subtracted from a $271.2 million total development value to reach the $214.5 million appraised value. Suffice it to say that, while the FCR and Extell bids were not apples to apples (as opponents like DDDB suggest), FCR’s claims should not have been taken at face value.

Notably, one board member, Mitchell Pally, dissented significantly from the "done deal," and board chairman Peter Kalikow, a real estate executive who was a contributor to and appointee of AY advocate Gov. George Pataki, famously dissed the MTA's own appraiser, saying that the $214.5 million "is just some guy's idea of what it's worth."

"That was his opinion, and it wasn't borne out by the marketplace," Kalikow said, somehow forgetting that, given that Forest City Ratner was anointed as the developer for 18 months before an RFP was sent out to bidders, the platform wasn’t exactly level.

Governance changes

In a section on governance, the Commission suggests reforms:
Public authorities like MTA are intended to strike a balance between political accountability and political independence. Their governing boards, under the guidance of a Chairman, are expected to be sufficiently independent to make difficult and sometimes unpopular business decisions outside of the arena of elected politics, but to be held accountable to both elected officials and the public through objective measures of service and financial performances. The Commission is of the view that MTA’s current governance structure does not effectively balance these interests.

Before 2005, the Chairman acted as a CEO with the power to delegate powers to an Executive Director, but after 2005—and in time for the Atlantic Yards deal—executive responsibility was vested in an Executive Director serving at the will and pleasure of the board. While the Commission takes pains to say its recommendations do “not reflect on the individuals who have or are serving in the positions potentially affected by our recommendations” and makes no reference to deals like Atlantic Yards, it suggests a major change.

The report states:
The Commission is of the view that executive powers for running the MTA should be restored to an independent full-time MTA Chairman, serving for a fixed term. It is only a Chairman who can be perceived as sufficiently independent of all elected officials that can have the necessary credibility with all MTA constituencies, and particularly the Legislature, to successfully promote and execute the public programs necessary to enhance our regional public transportation system. Neither an Executive Director, recommended by the Governor and serving at the pleasure of the Board, nor a Chairman lacking the power to direct management of the agency so as to deliver on the commitments made to obtain funding, can fulfill these essential objectives.

More transparency needed

The Commission also calls for increased transparency, suggesting changes not via legislation but related “to agency processes, organization and culture.” While the recommendations deal with issues of the balance between capital costs and operating objectives, and procurement and delivery mechanisms, they also call for increased information.

The report states:
The Commission has also reviewed the capital program documentation made available by MTA to the public on a routine basis and believes that improvements in the specificity and detail of this reporting should be required so as to facilitate better understanding of the agencies’ actual performance in the execution of current and future capital programs. The MTA now makes available a considerable amount of information through the capital plan itself, amendments to the plan, monthly reports to the MTA Boards Capital Program Oversight Committee (CPOC), and the Capital section of the MTA’s Financial Plan that is released periodically over the course of the year. While there is no dearth of information, it is not altogether useful in its present form. Fundamentally, none of these documents permit a comprehensive review of the status of the MTA capital plan. For many projects, relevant information is unavailable or incomplete. And information presented in CPOC reports does not follow the project listings in the capital plan, does not cover many projects in the plan and is not made available on the MTA website.

Where's Vanderbilt Yard info?

Indeed, there’s barely a mention of the Vanderbilt Yard (search) on the MTA site, much less a way to track progress.

From the 2006 MTA Annual Report:
In Brooklyn, the development company Forest City Ratner is planning a multi-use project to be built in part over the Vanderbilt Yard of Long Island Rail Road adjacent to its Flatbush Avenue-Atlantic Terminal Station. The deal will become final once all of the requisite approvals are in place. Forest City Ratner has agreed to pay the MTA $100 million for the right to build a portion of its Atlantic Yard project over the tracks. Key to the project is an arena that will be home to the Nets professional basketball team that is currently playing in New Jersey.

From the 2007 MTA Annual Report:
In Brooklyn, the development company Forest City Ratner continues its planning for a multi-use project to be built in part over the Vanderbilt Yard of the Long Island Rail Road, adjacent to its Flatbush Avenue-Atlantic Terminal Station. The deal will become final once all of the requisite approvals are in place. Forest City Ratner has agreed to pay the MTA $100 million for the right to build a portion of its Atlantic Yard project over the current yard and to build a new yard for LIRR on adjacent LIRR property. Key to the project is an arena that will be home to the Nets professional basketball team that is currently playing in New Jersey.

That's not very informative.

Where's the $100 million?

In an MTA webinar last April, executive director Elliot (Lee) Sander expressed concern about the whereabouts of the $100 million in cash that developer Forest City Ratner in 2005 agreed to pay for the authority's Vanderbilt Yard. He said the money is assigned to the 2005-09 capital program--for which I could find no current reference on the MTA web site.

His statement:
There was approximately a billion dollars associated with the sale of MTA real estate assets to support that program. There are some monies there that look like there may be challenges to proceed upon right now. There is money there--100 million dollars associated with the sale of Atlantic Yards, and I think many of you have read in the newspapers some of the difficulty Forest City is having with that development, so hopefully that will proceed, but we want to make sure that that happens—but we’re concerned about that.

"Closing on the sale of the Vanderbilt Yards has been delayed as the parties work through a number of issues, including outstanding litigation," MTA spokesman Jeremy Soffin told yesterday's Daily News.

Maybe the new transparency will inform as whether the $100 million would be available for the 2005-09 capital program.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.