Skip to main content

A dozen Atlantic Yards stories that have gotten scant or no coverage

Given tomorrow's IFC Media Project segment on Atlantic Yards, I'll list some recent AY-related stories that most media sources--especially the three major dailies--either haven't picked up or have gotten wrong.

1) Forest City Ratner's bailout of the national organization ACORN. It did get coverage on WNYC.

2) The work stoppage at the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Vanderbilt Yard, Forest City Ratner's lame explanation, and the fate of the Carlton Avenue bridge. Only the Daily News has covered that, among the dailies, relegating the story to the Brooklyn section.

3) Forest City Ratner's attempt to evade paying $159,000 in partial restitution to the city for demolished trees because the trees in the Atlantic Yards open space eventually would compensate for the loss.

4) The revelation that the seemingly-generous payments by the developer to buy out residents of the AY footprint were reimbursed by city taxpayers. Note that the Daily News got a front-page article, headlined Bonanza, out of the initial revelation, and the New York Times ran another article flattering to the developer, headlined Forced to Move, Some Find Greener Grass.

5) Forest City Ratner's spurious "Brooklyn Day" rally generated widespread coverage. The New York Times ignored it. (The Times ignored a lot this spring, as I wrote in an open letter to the Public Editor.)

6) Forest City Ratner's release of new Atlantic Yards renderings and a new timetable last May generated widespread coverage. The New York Times ignored it.

7) The view of Atlantic Yards in neighborhood scale. Still.

8) Andrew Zimbalist's "voodoo economics" report for Forest City Ratner that predicted $6 billion in new revenues. Still.

9) The legitimacy of the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement hailed by Mayor Mike Bloomberg and whether Forest City Ratner's outreach effort has proved to be, as the New York Times inadvisedly dubbed it 10/14/05, "a new and finely detailed modern blueprint for how to nourish--and then harvest--public and community backing for a hugely ambitious development...." Still.

10) The phantom Atlantic Yards scaleback that somehow became the lead story in the 9/5/06 metro edition of the New York Times. This left a big impression on people with a cursory knowledge of Atlantic Yards, many of whom did not read the follow-up article some three weeks later, which stated, “Moreover, the new reduction only brings the project back to the original size proposed in 2003.”

11) Why exactly do the city and state give away naming rights for sports facilities that are publicly owned, without asking even for a piece of the action? "There’s no reason for this to be private money," author Neil deMause said earlier this year. "If the public is building the stadium, if the public is owning the stadium, why should the team get to slap a name and get the money from it, or consider the money from it that pays off the stadium as paying off their share?" Rep. Dennis Kucinich, whose subcommittee has been investigating sports facilities, is perplexed, as well.

12) Forest City Ratner's claim of winning 20 court decisions was repeated without proof by various media outlets. Even though there's since been a loss, shouldn't the developer be asked for a tally?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.