Skip to main content

Chuck Ratner repudiates cousin Bruce's AY 2018 pledge, says marketplace determines pace of project

Despite Bruce Ratner’s pledge in May that “[w]e anticipate finishing all of Atlantic Yards by 2018,” his cousin Chuck Ratner, president and CEO of parent Forest City Enterprises today told investment analysts in a conference call that, while Atlantic Yards would take longer than expected, he couldn’t predict a timeline because it would be determined by the market.

(He was assuming that legal challenges would be cleared.)

Chuck Ratner, who though questioned would not estimate the costs of delay, also reaffirmed the developer’s commitment to the project and declared that city and state officials maintained that commitment. Also, unchallenged by the analysts, he flatly stated that the developer had completed all the work it could at the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Vanderbilt Yard.

Ratner's statements about Atlantic Yards--firm commitment at no announced pace--suggest that Forest City is hedging its bets, hoping to attract new investors and/or additional government subsidies.

Indeed, Ratner predicted a dramatic decline in the dollar value of construction starting next year--one building, with the exception of the Atlantic Yards project.

However, in another example of hedging his bets, he refused to attach a dollar value to Atlantic Yards construction even though, should the $950 million arena proceed as pledged, the value of construction in the developer's portfolio would not decline as dramatically as predicted.

(Update: Here's coverage from Crain's and the Daily News, which pointed out that Ratner's refusal to commit to a timeline was "a reversal from an earlier 2018 target date.")

Somber tone

Still, the overall tone was very somber, as Ratner declared that, though he'd seen many challenging times in 42 years of business, "I must confess, I’ve never seen anything quite like this. We believe conditions will worsen."

Ratner said FCE's near-term priority is maintaining liquidity, hence the decision to suspend the dividend and to hold a rare conference call after the release of third-quarter financial results. (Typically the calls are scheduled after second- and fourth-quarter results.)

The market reacted by sending Forest City's stock down more than 15%, closing at $6.97.

Nearly everything has slowed

Forest City has stalled nearly all new development. “The dynamics of the market have changed dramatically, and with rare exception, the returns available on new development do not justify the required equity commitment," said CFO Bob O'Brien.

Chuck Ratner declared, "The near-term effect of these [moves] will be to transition Forest City from a development company with an operating portfolio to an operating company with a development capacity. We’ve done this before, most recently in the early ‘90s, when we cut development in response to market conditions and ultimately emerged stronger from that downturn.”

"Despite the slow-down, we retain our core development capacity, as well as a reservoir of entitled opportunities where we can re-start additional vertical development, largely on our schedule, with modest carrying costs," he said. "When conditions improve, we will be able to take advantage of these opportunities."

“In fact, we’ve already been approached to fix broken development deals, participate in the purchase of deeply discounted project debt, and review distressed sellers’ situations," Ratner said. "To date, we’ve taken action on very few of these opportunities, and we believe the risk-adjusted returns need to be extraordinary before we’ll consider committing incremental capital.”

What have they closed down? "We had several one off retail opportunities that we elected not to proceed with," Ratner said. "We had next phases on several of our residential projects in Oakland, in Texas, in other places, elected not to proceed… We were ready to start the first building at our project in Washington, we're not going to start for a while. On the big mixed-use ones, as we indicated, we feel good about those. We’re going to sit—we had another building we were ready to do in Boston… if a tenant comes along and we can get a fully leased building… we’ll do it.

Committed to AY

Despite putting "virtually all new development on hold," Ratner declared, "I need to emphasize here again that we remain committed to our projects under construction and we will meet our obligations and maintain our entitlements, including at our large multi-phase, mixed-use projects, such as Stapleton in Denver, Mesa del Sol in Albuquerque, Central Station in Chicago, the Yards and Waterfront Station in Washington, and of course, to Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn, where we continue make progress and remain committed to the project, despite hurdles that we still need to overcome."

Note that the obligations, as so far expressed in the City and State Funding Agreements, give Forest City Ratner, the developer's New York affiliate, a long leash.

AY snags?

Analyst Rich Moore asked, "Looking at Brooklyn, real quick, can you give us a little color on how you guys feel about it. Obviously it’s a big project that comes up a lot… something that eventually could be an issue, could have impairments possibly, could have issues for you guys?"

"There’s lots of ‘coulds,’ OK?" Ratner responded. "There’s lots of things that could happen. We’ve been here before, right? We’re here with Brooklyn, 25 years ago, at MetroTech. We’re here with University Park at MIT. We were here with San Francisco Center for almost a decade. That doesn’t mean everything works out, you saw our project write-offs are up."

(Well, it depends on what "here" means. After all, Forest City Enterprises and Bruce Ratner have never had principal ownership of a basketball team, nor built a sports arena.)

"We’re very committed to this project, we believe very strongly in the market, which continues to be good," he continued. "The apartment market, the rental market, in Brooklyn, for that matter in Manhattan, continues to be strong. Yeah, there’s going to be more hurt and it’s going to go down before it goes up. But we remain very committed to this markets and these products, longer term."

Note that he didn't say anything about the availability of scarce bonds to finance the affordable housing.

Why work is stalled

"Specifically to Atlantic Yards, there were some articles in the newspaper, you probably saw them, that we’ve stopped work," he said. "We stopped work because the work we were doing came to an end. We did what we were supposed to do on the demolition and the railyards. Until we get our lawsuits resolved and some of the hurdles overcome, we appropriately stopped what we were doing."


"We remain committed to this and when we get--and we believe we will--successfully through the last of the litigation in 2009, we’ll evaluate the market at the time and see what our next steps are. But at this point in time, Rich, we don’t see any, uh—we don’t see any, uh, any potential impairment or any issue with our continuing to develop this property. It will take longer than we thought it was going to take, as it already has."

Loan renegotiation

Ratner then described a mortgage loan: "I’ll just preemptively reference one of the maturities in ‘09 that everybody asks about, which is the Gramercy loan… obviously, that’s a loan on the land at Atlantic Yards, it matures in February of 2009, and we’re actively engaged in a negotiation on extending the terms."

(Correction: I previously described the mortgage loan as $40 million; the Wall Street Journal says $153 million.)

The costs of delay

Another analyst asked a question that didn't get answered: "Jumping over to the Atlantic Yards project, thanks for addressing your commitment to it. I’m wondering, how long can you delay that project if you needed to and what’s the extra cost of carrying that?"

"How long can we delay the project?" Ratner responded. "We’ll continue to work with the public parties, they’re still very committed to the project, both the city and the state. And I say we’ve been here before, and I think we can successfully do that until we are prepared to start."

"I can’t tell you today in this market when that will be, but we certainly intend with 2000--when we have these legal problems behind us, we intend to evaluate the market, the financing, and then proceed," he continued. "I don’t know the answer specifically to how long we could delay. It’s not a question of entitlements, it’s a question of the marketplace."

Hedging, hedging on AY

An investment analyst asked when it would be clear that Forest City is spending significantly less on capital projects.

"In each of last four years, we have averaged $800 million of construction starts… much of that funded with mortgage debt, some of that funded with our equity," Ratner said, noting that the company has very little equity left.

"In the coming year, with the exception of Atlantic Yards, which we’ve talked a lot about, which we’re very committed to, and are prepared to deal as soon as we get-—as we resolve our issues with the lawsuits, with the exception of Atlantic Yards, we still do not expect to start more than one building," he said. "That will be the most immediate and dramatic effect of what we have done."

"Atlantic Yards is a big project, but leaving that aside, until we make a decision to do more, that’s where you’re going to see the most dramatic effect of the reduction of our development," he said.

However, a $950 million arena, even over three years, is more than $300 million a year. A first residential building would cost well over $100 million, parceled out over two years.

In other words, Ratner could have said that Forest City Enterprises expects to proceed with nearly half a billion dollars in development next year.

He didn’t.

Atlantic Yards remains very, very murky.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…