Skip to main content

Featured Post

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what's coming + FAQ (pinned post)

If (unlikely) travel ban on Chinese Community Party members (and executives at state-owned enterprises) proceeds, that would impact developer Greenland

A 7/16/20 front-page New York Times article, U.S. Weighs Sweeping Travel Ban on Chinese Communist Party Members, described a proposed but not yet advanced presidential order:
The Trump administration is considering a sweeping ban on travel to the United States by members of the Chinese Communist Party and their families, according to people familiar with the proposal, a move that would almost certainly prompt retaliation against Americans seeking to enter or remain in China and exacerbate tensions between the two nations.
The presidential proclamation, still in draft form, could also authorize the United States government to revoke the visas of party members and their families who are already in the country, leading to their expulsion. Some proposed language is also aimed at limiting travel to the United States by members of the People’s Liberation Army and executives at state-owned enterprises, though many of them are likely to also be party members.
An Atlantic Yards impact?

The parent company of Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park master developer Greenland USA is, of course, Greenland Holding Group, aka Greenland Holding Corp., a publicly traded but significantly state-owned enterprise. To quote credit ratings agency Moody's:
Headquartered in Shanghai, Greenland Holding Group Company Limited is a state-controlled enterprise that primarily focuses on the real estate sector, with dealings in construction, finance and auto dealerships as well. The Shanghai State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission is effectively the largest shareholder of Greenland Holding.
The Times article notes that the proposed ban might be very impractical, given that the Chinese Communist Party has 92 million members and few are on government radar screens.

The rationale would be block travel "by foreign nationals who are deemed 'detrimental to the interests of the United States.'" That would encompass business leaders like Alibaba's Jack Ma, a partner of (Taiwanese-Canadian) Brooklyn Nets owner Joe Tsai.

In the unlikely event the idea moves forward, I'd bet certain business groups, as well as New York City/State elected officials, would argue that real-estate developers building projects are not necessarily detrimental to national interests.

Meanwhile, China called the proposal "pathetic" and "ridiculous," according to the South China Morning Post.

Comments