Skip to main content

Is giant Dean Street fence for construction mitigation or to protect improper worker parking? State obfuscates (and says fence will be re-evaluated in six months)

Also see coverage of the AY CDC meeting regarding project timing.

So, is the giant 16-foot construction fence--which needs more support than the typical 8-foot one--encroaching on a good portion of Dean Street outside the southeast block of the project site there to mitigate noise from construction activities?

Or does it mostly provide free parking for construction workers, thus benefiting developer Greenland Forest City Partners?

Free parking inside Dean Street construction fence, 6/7/17
The fence, justified when vertical construction was ongoing for the 535 Carlton and 550 Vanderbilt towers, remains in place for those mitigation reasons, state officials insisted at the meeting 6/6/17 of the Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation (AY CDC).

They claimed there was ongoing construction behind that fence, despite evidence to the contrary. Nor had they publicly acknowledged the fence had already been partially reconfigured.

An undisclosed change

The discussion began at about 37:40 of the webcast. Board member Jaime Stein noted that the board had been told that the fence would remain at 16 feet to mitigate noise and dust impacts. She said that she'd noticed, and been informed by community members, that the fence had been decreased to 8 feet on Dean Street opposite the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) facility near Carlton Avenue.

Stein asked how that happened and what the impact was.

Tobi Jaiyesimi, AY CDC executive director and the Atlantic Yards project manager for Empire State Development (ESD), the state authority overseeing and shepherding the project, didn't clarify the issue, suggesting that the fence was in front of some open space currently being worked on.

Free parking inside Dean Street construction fence, 12/6/16
ESD planner Rachel Shatz related that the USPS approached the city Department of Transportation, which in turn approached the state authority. "They had logistical conflicts with being able to enter into their loading base," she said. So to allow USPS trucks to make turns, "we would reduce the fence height so we could move those barriers back. It was a safety issue over mitigation."

"I don’t remember being informed of that," Stein responded, in diplomatic rebuke. "I sort of view the role of the board to oversee the enactment of the mitigations."

"I may have been mistaken," Shatz said, regarding informing the board. "It went in a response letter to DSBA [Dean Street Block Association]," which last fall raised concerns about the fence once the developer announced an unspecified delay in project construction. (See letters below.)

"Ongoing construction activity"

"I understand there have been requests by community to reduce the full length of the fence," Jaiyesimi said. "It is for mitigation measures, there is still ongoing construction activity that’s happening at the fence."

"I think there’s also a dumpster right behind the shortened fence," Stein said, "so I’m wondering, what’s the impact on the folks right across the street, who are meant to benefit from 16 feet?"

Below is a 4/7/17 video of a garbage truck operating behind the lowered fence. (It's gone now.)

"I think we need to review site conditions," Shatz said, and colleagues concurred.

Moving the fence back

"My concern isn’t the height of the fence," added board member Linda Reardon, acknowledging the height was necessary during active construction. "Could the fence location laterally, not of height, be shifted around the rest of the block, given the safety concerns that have been voiced about the current traffic configuration there, with bicycles alongside buses in a very constrained width?"

"Especially since we were told there would not be active construction there for a while," Reardon added, "could the fence be located further back, to mitigate the traffic safety concerns?"

The 16-foot fence requires more barriers for support
"We’ve asked the developer to consider that, but apparently there’s space that’s needed within the site, for their equipment and whatever vehicles are needed to get around the site," Shatz replied. "And that to move it in is a huge undertaking, first of all, because of what has to be dismantled… the size and the weight of the cement blocks. It didn’t seem reasonable to us to ask them to keep moving it in and back."

(The challenge must not be that huge if the fence was partly moved to accommodate the USPS. That said, ESD has asserted that it would be impossible to both move the fence back and keep at at 16 feet, because of the support structure behind the taller fence.)

Reardon asked for further information about the circulation needs behind the fence, "because the cost to me doesn’t seem to be equal to the safety concerns on the public side."

Shatz said there "there are no concerns from the emergency vehicles."

(Actually, some have been stalled by traffic jams, as indicated in the screenshot below, from 7/10/15 post.)

"And we’ve made observations on the site about how the buses can access" the block, Shatz said, "and it's fine, unless someone illegally parks on the other side of the street, which is an illegal condition." (Of course that means the margin of error is smaller.)

Shatz noted that moving the fence back would not restore parking on the block: "there didn’t seem to be enough of a win in the whole package."

Impact of project timing

A longer delay could change things, officials acknowledged.

"If we are here six months ago and there’s no work, and there’s still no determination there’s going to be work, we agree 100%," said ESD Senior VP Marion Phillips III. "We’re looking at six months, a year, 18 months with no construction, it’s a different conversation... Right now, we do not believe, based on conversations, we’re going to be in a long period of no work. Right now there is work going on behind the fence. But in terms of when they’ll start going vertical again, it could be sooner rather than later."

(As shown in the map below, which I annotated and published last October, B11 and B14 are finished, but B12 and B13 construction has not started.)

"Is around six months a trigger?" asked board member Cy Richardson.

"I think it gives us a better perspective to approach the developer: 'Do you have a timetable?'" Phillips responded. "If the answer is no, it’s easier for us to make another request." (Representatives of the developer, though present at the meeting, were not asked about the timing.)

"We constantly ask that, and they’re constantly evaluating," Phillips continued. "But we’ll get the information you asked for, which is the type of work going on behind the fence."

A rebuke from the public

The only public commenter was Peter Krashes of DSBA, at 1:43:45 of the webcast. He noted that the DSBA sent a letter regarding the green wall last fall, after the halt of vertical construction. "The [ESD] response described our request as being the lowering of the height, which is not correct; we were asking for the wall to be moved back."

"Marion’s letter said it was never anticipated that there would be a change in the height, which exactly what happened, because of USPS," Krashes added. "To my knowledge, the notice of the lowering came from Dean Street letter to ESD, not the ESD’s letter to us." The block association has not received a response to its second letter.

Krashes noted that the fence was "put in place in the middle of the street, without any outreach to the existing businesses, at least two of them which have the same loading dock issues as the post office."

"The fence is magnifying the construction impact over time on that block rather than reducing it," he said, noting the "dumpster"--actually a truck rather than a receptacle--caused the most noise.

Krashes added a larger critique of the project. "This is somehow the lesson that ESD has never learned, which is that a 10-year project becomes a 30-year project, a delay in construction that may be four months becomes two years. That mitigation needs to change, you need to be flexible and adjust."

"And I would add that there is very little construction happening behind the fence," he said, "and the construction that is happening is parking for construction workers, which is illegal." (It's likely improper, if not illegal.)

An exchange of letters (full text embedded at bottom)

Free parking inside Dean Street construction fence, 6/7/17
The DSBA on 12/6/16 wrote to ESD President Howard Zemsky:
In October, Greenland Forest City Ratner [sic] announced delays in starting construction for B13 and B12. With no concrete construction schedule for those sites, we believe the street would be safer and the community’s quality of life improved, with the fence moved temporarily to restore Dean Street’s full travel lane, parking lane and northern sidewalk to the public.

Since the placement of the fence on Dean Street adjacent to the B13 and B12 lots, the sidewalk and street bed behind the fence have primarily been used for construction worker parking.
ESD's Phillips responded 3/2/17, writing that the fence:
will be maintained at 16 feet due to its ability to mitigate significant adverse noise impacts and construction staging logistics...
Reducing the fence height to eight (8) feet would not result in restoring a vehicular travel lane... [or] restoring parking on Dean Street or widening of the northern sidewalk."

Per the Developer, temporary Open Space construction on the B11 and B14 Sites will be ongoing from the first quarter through the third quarter of 2017. There is no anticipated construction schedule for B12 and B13 currently; however, construction activity may increase in the fall of 2017. In the interim, B12 and B13 sites will be used for construction staging activities related to work ongoing at the rail yard until such time that they are needed for building construction. The Developer also indicated that the Memorandum of Environmental Commitments (MEC), which requires the fence, calls for a 16 foot fence, and does not contemplate installation of multiple fences of varying heights.

Additionally, a construction noise barrier height comparative analysis was conducted in November 2014... [it] determined that the lower 8-foot barrier height would result in increased noise levels primarily at the second and third floors of residential buildings on the south side of Dean Street across from Block 1129.
The DSBA responded 3/21/17 (emphases in original):
From your reply, we understand the primary issues related to the fence are:
... significant adverse noise impacts and construction staging logistics.
Since the wall’s inception, the Dean Street Block Association has worked on the noise mitigation issues listed in the Memorandum of Environmental Commitments (MEC). We advocated successfully for double paned windows and have long advocated for Empire State Development (ESD) to identify the level of noise reduction sought via the current mitigation.
The community’s primary request is for the fence to be moved north [to] provide full access of Dean Street and the northern sidewalk, not for a height reduction. In your response, you state:
Reducing the fence height to eight (8) feet would not result in restoring a vehicular travel lane on Dean Street. The shorter 8-foot fence would be positioned atop a smaller concrete jersey barrier, which would provide only an additional approximately five feet of space to the existing vehicular travel lane.
On this matter, we agree. The community is not seeking a mere five feet of travel lane access. We’re seeking full access to the street and sidewalk. Moving the fence will help in the following ways:
1. Reduce the enhanced vehicular noise bouncing from the walls into our homes and businesses
2. Limit traffic congestion and therefore lowering noise levels
3. Improve emergency response (from the great women and men at Engine 219 and Tower Ladder 105)
4. Support our local businesses with their day-to-day operations
Additionally, your letter states:
The Developer also indicated that the Memorandum of Environmental Commitments (MEC), which requires the fence, calls for a 16 foot fence, and does not contemplate installation of multiple fences of varying heights.
Yet, today a multi-height fence is exactly what exists. Today’s fencing is considerably lower across from 588 Dean than from 620 Dean Street. So installation of fences “of varying heights” has been accomplished..
To ensure common ground and understanding, we thought to list activities related to block 1129 on Dean Street.
• Eastbound route for the B65 Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) bus line
• Eastbound bike lane travel per New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT)
• Access for over 7 parcel trucks from the United States Postal Service (USPS)
• Access for multiple daily visits from 18-wheel USPS trucks coming from their East New York facility
• Move-in staging for new residents of 535 Carlton Avenue
• Vehicular access for existing businesses
• Pedestrian access for current community members
• Pedestrian access for the new residents of 535 Carlton Avenue and 550 Vanderbilt Avenue
And as stated in the preceding letter (dated December 22, 2016), the current area behind the fence (street bed and sidewalk) is primarily utilized for construction worker private vehicle parking, which is illegal per the NYC DOT’s MPT requirements.
As you note:
... construction activity may increase in the fall of 2017.
Per this statement, we understand that activity may not increase. The Developer’s track record coupled with public announcements related to continuing the development of B12 and B13 lead to the potential for ongoing delays. With no concrete construction schedule for those sites, we believe the street would be safer and the community’s quality of life improved with the fence moved temporarily to restore Dean Street’s full travel lane, parking lane and northern sidewalk to the public. We believe that the quality of life and safety improvements outweigh the mitigations you state.
DSBA Letter - Green Construction Fence 12-6-16 by Norman Oder on Scribd


Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

This graphic, posted in November 2017, is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. Note the unbuilt B1 and the proposed shift in bulk to the unbuilt Site 5.

The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change. The project is already well behind that tentative timetable.

The previous graphic, from August 2017 (without the ghost B1)

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …