Skip to main content

After bombshell about delays: What's new schedule? Affordable housing by 2025? Tower reconfiguration?

The evidence for Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park delays has been glaring, as the headlines at right from this blog indicate.

But not until last Thursday did Forest City Realty Trust, in a press release, announce that "the company, as part of a formal strategic plan update, made the decision to revise the overall project schedule to delay future vertical development."

That raised some significant lingering questions, only a few of which were touched on during the conference call the next day with investment analysts.

But they need to be answered, and the Nov. 14 meeting of the Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation (AY CDC), the body set up to advise Empire State Development (the state authority overseeing/shepherding the project), should offer an opportunity.

Project timing: when is it finished?

As I wrote, Forest City CEO David LaRue did not reveal the new schedule. But surely the development team--Greenland Forest City Partners--has a new schedule (or schedules) and they should share it.

Company CFO Bob O'Brien said in the conference call that the firm's financial model "extends to 2035, 20 years from now."  That doesn't necessarily mean a completion date by 2035, but it does suggest that the project won't be done by 2025, the time by which the affordable housing is supposed to be completed.

The 2035 date may represent stabilization of income, but presumably that's no more than five years--maybe less--after which the project should be finished. That suggests delays in fighting the "blight" of the open railyard and delivering the much-promoted "open space," which the developers call a "park" (not really).

(Remember, the 2035 date was the shocking "outside date" agreed to in a 2009 project revision, which in 2014 was dialed back to 2025 for the affordable housing.)

Note in below map significant delays: for example, the two unbuilt sites on the southeast block, B12 and B13, should be under way, but aren't, and are rather for sale, as is B4.

My October 2016 annotation of 2014 tentative schedule
Affordable housing deadline

As I asked Friday, what happens to the June 2014 agreement, reached by New York State and some community community negotiators, to guarantee--with penalties--the 2,250 units of affordable housing by May 2025, "subject to extensions set forth in the Development Agreement and the General Project Plan"?

None of the investment analysts asked about this affordable housing commitment and, perhaps because of that, the issue didn't make into any of the mainstream coverage (Cleveland Plain Dealer, The Real Deal).

On Twitter, Gib Veconi, who in 2014 on behalf of BrooklynSpeaks helped negotiate the 2025 affordable housing deadline (after the project was given an "outside date" of 2035, a 25-year buildout), seemed reasonably confident that penalties will enforce the 2025 date.

So I have my doubts, given the pattern of this project.

One way, perhaps, to meet that 2025 deadline is to build more "100% affordable" rental buildings. Note that, in the original plan, all the rental buildings were to be 50% market, 50% subsidized--though that's actually 50/30/20, given the breakdown of moderate- and middle-income units, as well as low-income units.

Now we have two "100% affordable" rental buildings, which in turn will be matched by "100% market" rental buildings. That deviation from the more egalitarian model was justified as delivering affordable housing sooner.

That justification might be heard again, and result in buildings with distinctly different profiles: a project divided mostly into market-rate and affordable buildings.


What about the railyard?

The new Vanderbilt Yard to store and service Long Island Rail Road trains was supposed to be finished by December 2017. Now it looks to be 2018, according to O'Brien's remarks last Friday.

It's worth finding out when in 2018 the completion is projected.

Other questions

As I wrote, several other questions remain:
  • will covering the railyard for vertical construction be delayed? And doesn't that prolong blight?
  • how much tension is this causing between Forest City and its Shanghai-based partner?
  • beyond the three sites already up for sale/new investment, how much more might be sold?
  • will the developers seek more subsidies, or relaxed terms regarding the affordable housing?
Indeed, it was fascinating to hear Forest City use language that left the impression this was a unilateral decision, and to hear the investment analysts fail to press regarding Greenland's role.

Greenland surely had to concur with such decisions, but surely is not happy with a project it once claimed could be built out in eight years.

There are larger retrospective questions, of course, about what went wrong--a series of factors, I'd say--which likely will surface for analysis shortly.

How things might get better/worse for developers

Atlantic Yards, as I've said, is a "never say never" project, and there are multiple ways the scenario might change. Here are a few speculations:
  • a new 421-a law makes building apartments more attractive, and starts the timetable again
  • additional subsidies, or relaxed terms, make the affordable units more profitable
  • an approval to move bulk from the B1 site at the arena prow to Site 5 across Flatbush Avenue unlocks a huge new project
  • new investors inject capital into the project
  • Forest City and Greenland clash (and sue each other?) and/or buy each other out (and then sell to others)
  • the deck over the railyard gets delayed 

Another tentative timetable showing delay

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…