Skip to main content

After altercation, Barclays Center dials back policy allowing later-than-recommended alcohol sales during hockey games; will probe arena-fan relations

In the wake of an altercation between fans and security officers at the Barclays Center Tuesday, the arena announced several policy changes, which were summarized, in flattering fashion, by the Daily News and Post as cutting off alcohol sales "early."

(Also see coverage in NewsdaySports Illustrated, and the Times. Also note the criticism, as described below, of the overall policy changes.)

Indeed, by ending sale of alcohol by the end of the second period--as opposed to the 12-minute mark of the third period--the Barclays Center will cut booze off earlier. (Note that the 12-minute mark of the third period is 8 minutes in.)

But the policy change obscures the fact that arena's previously policy was rather aggressive, compared to some other arenas and recommended best practices, and the arena is only now adopting best practices. That suggests that (duh) they were trying to reap the most revenue.

True, as the Daily News stated, the National Hockey League (NHL) does not have a league policy on alcohol sales. 

Best practice = third period cutoff

But the TEAM Coalition (Techniques for Effective Alcohol Management), an alliance of professional and collegiate sports, entertainment facilities, and others, including the NHL, has recommended policies, approved by member organizations.

The policies "represent the mode (most frequently reported value) for all sports venues representing TEAM Coalition member leagues," and that includes alcohol cutoff for NHL games after the second period.

It's not easy to figure out what other venues follow the TEAM policies. But some are clearly more stringent than the Barclays Center's previous policy. 

At the TD Garden in Boston, alcohol service will end at least one hour prior to the scheduled end of an event, which is surely before the third period in hockey.

(Update: At the American Airlines Center in Dallas, alcohol sales end at the seven minute mark of the third period for NHL games. I should clarify that this is later than the 12-minute mark, but seems very, very late.)

Barclays Center statement

Here's the full statement:
On Tuesday night, December 15, there was an altercation during an Islanders game when arena staff tried to restrict guests from accessing an unauthorized area. Management immediately initiated an investigation, including reviewing all videos, meeting with staff and speaking to fans who were involved in, or witnessed, the incident. Law enforcement authorities were also notified of the incident. Any parties found to have acted inappropriately or in violation of arena policies will be dealt with accordingly. 
Barclays Center is immediately implementing the following five-point plan to help prevent incidents like this from happening again during Islanders games:
  • Reinforce security and guest services training with staff.
  • Further communicate Barclays Center alcohol policies to fans, which includes two drink per purchase limit.
  • End beer and alcohol sales at the end of the second intermission.
  • Convene season ticket holder focus groups within 30 days to discuss arena-fan relations.
  • Remind all guests of Barclays Center’s zero tolerance for any type of racial or discriminatory language or behavior.
The reaction

Hockey writer B.D. Gallof tweeted, "@barclayscenter this is not enough. This is striking out in all directions which shows no clue to what transpired." He added, " 1. Ongoing fan focus groups for fan relations for staff and mgt until you “get it” 2. Security review 3. Better oversight."

Note that the Barclays Center statement did not reference the fact that fans are disappointed that arena policies regarding movement of fans in the building, as compared to the previous Nassau Coliseum venue, are far more strict. Also note comment on Gallof's tweet said that one staffer did give permission for people later involved in altercation to take picture.

Here are some interesting takes from IslesBlog:
  • fans certainly responsible as well. Not sole blame on Barclays
  • Is Barclays saying security needs different training methods for handling hockey fans compared to basketball fans? Does any arena do that?\
  • You can be the most sober, cordial, respectful fan ever and noticed that security / ushers were consistently confrontational without cause.
  • I don't fundamentally disagree with any of the "5 Point Plan" but there was a failure to see this issue was brewing since September.
  • Let's also realize most of the drinking happening is on @LIRR BEFORE the #Isles
  • Still, their refusal of talking any responsibility in the wrongdoing and not offer any kind of a apology to the fans is just another misstep
  • I'm not saying @barclayscenter is 100% responsible. They weren't. I was there (unlike many that have commented on this since).
Also note that the arena's focus on ticketholders obscures concern from neighbors about the behavior of hockey fans outside the building, as noted by resident Regina Cahill, "how about also focusing on behaviors outside of arena."

And yes, one element of tension between staff and hockey fans emerged in this tweet, "@StapeNewsday how bout one white employee other than the first bar when you walk in @barclayscenter?"

Wrote Dan Saraceni at Lighthouse Hockey, before the policy change:
However the system broke down at Barclays, it did. Fair or not, it's up to the arena to make sure the next time it happens - and I've been to more than enough games to know there will be a next time - the staff is better organized and prepared to handle the situation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …