Skip to main content

Forest City finally changes Phase I definition in investor presentations, stressing intention to build on parking lot

I've written about how Forest City Ratner and Forest City Enterprises have given inconsistent and misleading definitions of what exactly constitutes Phase 1 of Atlantic Yards, using one definition for investors yet accepting another in government documents.

That has continued, in an odd way, as Forest City has belatedly changed the outline of the two phases in investor presentations. So now it signals investors that yes, it will be building sooner rather than later on the southeast block of the site, Block 1129, now occupied by a surface parking lot.

And it reminds us that, while Atlantic Yards was justified, in significant part, as removing the blight of a below-grade railyard between Pacific Street and Atlantic Avenue, that's hardly a priority.

A GIF version

The screenshots are further below, but first, a GIF.
From December 2013 and February 2014 investor presentations by Forest City Enterprises
In first, with light background, Phase 1 is west of Sixth Avenue; in second, Phase 1 has light blue back back shading


Officially, the division between phases is clear. According to the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC, or ESD), in documents like the 2009 Modified General Project Plan, the "portion of the Project Site west of 6th Avenue" constitutes Phase 1. The site east of 6th Avenue would be Phase 2.

In the graphic at right, the outlines of Phase 1 and Phase 2 are indicated by horizontal lines at the top. I annotated the map in red to show how Forest City has said it considers Block 1129 the next development site after the arena block.

Thus, for Forest City's business purposes, it's become part of Phase 1, since it doesn't require significant infrastructure investment (new permanent railyard, deck) to build over the railyard north of Pacific Street.

Nor does it require the acquisition (potentially via eminent domain) of private homes to build Building 15, the solo tower just east of Sixth Avenue between Dean and Pacific Streets.

But no government document acknowledges that.

Forest City's statements

The first inkling came when Forest City Ratner executive MaryAnne Gilmartin in October 2012 told investment analysts "we have seven buildings that we will build before we commence construction on any platform buildings."

That  indicated that Forest City had no immediate plans to build over the below-grade railyard, the clearest evidence of blight, though blight removal was a main justification for the use of eminent domain.

In the FCE annual report 10-K filed in March 2013 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company offered a new interpretation of the Atlantic Yards phases. The annual report stated:
Phase I of Brooklyn Atlantic Yards is comprised of eight buildings totaling approximately 3.4 million square feet—four buildings on the Arena Block (adjacent to the Barclays Center ) and four buildings on Block 1129. Phase II consists of seven buildings totaling approximately 3.3 million square feet—three buildings on Block 1120, three buildings on Block 1121 and one building on Block 1128.
After I reported on this, the New York Observer got a convoluted explanation from Forest City:
“The four buildings on Block 1129 are still, as they have always been, part of Phase II,” spokesman Joe DePlasco told The Observer. Sequencing for Phase II, he added, had yet to be determined and would be discussed as part of the environmental impact studies.
But what of the seeming discrepancy between Block 1129 being designated as part of Phase I in the annual report?
Mr. DePlasco cited a tangle of legalese, but the takeaway was that different documents “have different descriptions for different purposes.”
In other words, they can say whatever they want.

Forest City's recent Form 10-KT annual report, filed 2/27/14, contained the same language about the two phases.

December 2013: Phase 1 west of Sixth Avenue

Oddly, Forest City neglected to update its investor presentations to conform with its rhetoric.

Slide presentations from October 2012, December 2012April 2013June 2013July 2013 as well as the slide below from December 2013, adapted the ESDC graphic, in which Sixth Avenue remained the dividing line.

Investor Presentation, December 2013
(Note the, while buildings at far west are in yellow, indicating office use, the buildings can become housing, as well.)

February 2014: Phase I leapfrogs to Block 1129

By contrast, the investor presentation released 2/27/14 looks different. The light blue background shading in the bottom right clearly indicates that Forest City considers Block 1129 to be part of Phase I.
Investor Presentation, February 2014
Block 1129 not in initial plans

One irony, of course, is that initial plans in 2003 for Atlantic Yards completely omitted the southeast block, as indicated in the graphic at right.

The site was limited to the arena block and then the two blocks to the east above Pacific containing the rest of the Vanderbilt Yard.

That block was added later, likely because Forest City needed space for construction staging and interim parking--and for even more development.

Early plans to build on Block 1129

Note that, while not part of the documents used in the official approval process, a plan to build on Block 1129 in Phase 1 has actually been contemplated by Forest City Ratner for a long time.

Consider the graphic below, from the Memorandum of Understanding the developer signed 2/18/05 with the city and state. (The yellow Phase 1 not only included the southeast block, it also included the Building 15 site, which was expected to provide construction staging for the arena block, and thus would have been available for rapid development.)

Phasing shifts

By June 2005, as indicated in the graphic below from the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement, the phasing shifted, with Sixth Avenue as the dividing line.

That dividing line persisted in all official approval documents, including the September 2005 Draft Scope of Analysis for an environmental impact statement:
As described earlier, Phase I would consist of development of the arena blocks (Blocks 1118, 1119, and 1127), which are bounded by Atlantic Avenue to the north, Sixth Avenue to the east, Dean Street to the south, and Flatbush Avenue to the west, and Site 5 (Block 927), which is bounded by Atlantic Avenue to the north, Flatbush Avenue to the east, Pacific Street to the south, and Fourth Avenue to the west. The blocks on the eastern part of the project site (Blocks 1120, 1121, 1128, and 1129) would be built out during Phase II. 
The official dividing line persists today.

But it's irrelevant to Forest City Ratner's business purposes.


Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming + FAQ (post-dated pinned post)

This graphic, posted in February 2018, is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. Note the unbuilt B1 and the proposed--but not yet approved--shift in bulk to the unbuilt Site 5.

The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change. The project is already well behind that tentative timetable.

How many people are expected?

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park has a projected 6,430 apartments housing 2.1 persons per unit (as per Chapter 4 of the 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement), which would mean 13,503 new residents, with 1,890 among them in low-income affordable rentals, and 2,835 in moderate- and middle-income affordable rentals.

That leaves 8,778 people in market-rate rentals and condos, though let's call it 8,358 after subtracting 420 who may live in 200 promised below-market condos. So that's 5,145 in below-market units, though many of them won…

The passing of David Sheets, Dean Street renter, former Freddy's bartender, eminent domain plaintiff, and singular personality

David Sheets, longtime Dean Street renter, Freddy's bartender, eminent domain plaintiff, and singular personality, died 1/17/18 in HCA Greenview Hospital in Bowling Green, KY. He was 56.

There are obituary notices in the Bowling Green Daily News and the Wichita Eagle, which state:
He was born in Wichita, KS where he attended public Schools and Wichita State University. He lived for many years in Brooklyn, NY, and was employed as a legal assistant. David's hobby was cartography and had an avid interest in Mass Transit Systems of the world. David was predeceased by his father, Kenneth E. Sheets. He is survived by his mother, Wilma Smith, step-brother, Billy Ray Smith and his wife, Jane all of Bowling Green; step-sister, Ellen Smith Alexander and her husband, Jerry of Bella Vista, AR; several cousins and step-nieces and step-nephews also survive. Memorial Services will be on Monday, January 22, 2018 at 1:00 pm with visitation from 10:00 am to 1:00 pm Monday at Johnson-Vaughn-Phe…

Some skepticism on Belmont hockey deal: lease value seems far below Aqueduct racino; unclear (but large?) cost for LIRR service

As I wrote for The Bridge 12/20/1, The Islanders Say Bye to Brooklyn, But Where Next?, the press conference announcing a new arena at Belmont Park for the New York Islanders was "long on pomp... but short on specifics."

Notably, a lease valued at $40 million "upfront to lease up to 43 acres over 49 years... seems like a good deal on rent for the state-controlled property." Also, the Long Island Rail Road will expand service to Belmont.

That indicates public support for an arena widely described as "privately financed," but how much? We don't know yet, but some more details--or at least questions--have emerged.

An Aqueduct comparable?

Well, we don't know what the other bid was, and there aren't exactly parcels that large offering direct comparables.

But consider: Genting New York LLC in September 2010 was granted a franchise to operate a video lottery terminal under a 30 year lease on 67 acres at Aqueduct Park (as noted by Gov. Andrew Cuomo).


Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…