Skip to main content

Kemistry lounge (or bottle-service club) faces liquor license hearing tomorrow; neighbors slam increased hours, commitment to bottle service, disingenuous behavior

Via Park Slope Stoop
Remember Kemistry, the self-described "restaurant, bar and lounge" (or, as neighbors contend, bottle service nightclub) planned for Flatbush Avenue near Prospect Place, with a back emergency exit on a residential street?

The establishment, with a capacity for 225 people, faces a hearing before the State Liquor Authority (SLA) Wednesday, July 17, with an array of neighbors, Community Board 6, and local elected officials opposing it.

The objections focus on Kemistry's plans to stay open late every night (and until 4 am on Saturday and Sunday), its commitment to bottle service, and a pattern of apparent disingenuous behavior.

(My query to Kemistry went unanswered.)

The hearing, which includes many other applications, begins at 10 am at the SLA office at 317 Lenox Avenue near 126th Street in Harlem, near the 125th Street stop on the 2 or 3 trains. It also should be webcast.

Also see coverage in DNAInfo, which quotes neighbors' attorney Peter Adelman: "Having another bar, I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, but having this one is very bad." Note that Kemistry, while surely seeking to capitalize in part on late-night post-event crowds, likely aims to rely on a much broader clientele.

Neighbors' case

Kemistry, as noted in the CB 6 letter, came to agreement on a host of issues raised by critics, but not all. The organization Prospect Place Neighbors (PPN), via Adelman, details in a submission to the SLA three areas of conflict, part of an effort "to shoehorn an outsized club into this radically ill-suited location":
  • Kemistry entirely retreated from its initial promise to the community, CB6 and elected officials that it would “brick up” the inappropriate glass fa├žade that would face onto residential Prospect Place. At a March 26, 2012 public review session held by Community Board 6, Kemistry outright promised to “brick up” the Prospect Place exterior of the proposed nightclub/lounge, if that were necessary to allay community concerns. After later suggesting that its landlord might not permit the promised renovations (which was untrue), Kemistry finally abandoned all pretense of accommodating this intensely important community concern, recently suggesting it try to conceal its inappropriate glass frontage with “opaque, soundproof curtains.” 
  • Kemistry refused to scale back on its proposed hours of operation in recognition of its sensitive, semi-residential location. Remarkably, it has instead proposed progressively longer hours, recently (and brazenly) proposing to stay open on school nights as late as 4:00 a.m., and no earlier than 2:00 a.m. 
  • Kemistry has doggedly continued to insist upon providing hard-liquor bottle service, despite widespread opposition to this roundly disfavored practice. And as if to make a mockery of concerned community members, elected officials and this Authority, after months of adamantly refusing to negotiate its intention to provide hard liquor bottle service, in its recently-filed application, Kemistry now claims “not to understand what Bottle Service means.” 
Note that, while there's no statutory definition of "bottle service," it's a fairly well-known concept, offered by, among other outlets, branches of Jay-Z's 40/40 Club.

During the process, Kemistry's proposed hours have expanded. The proposal emerged in March 2012, when a CB 6 committee considered the application, which at that point proposed no Sunday hours, and Mon-Wed hours until 11 pm, (rather than 2 pm as of now), Thursday until 1 am (rather than 3 am now), and Friday until 2 (rather than 3:30 am now), and Saturday until 3:30 (rather than 4 am now).

Prospect Place Neighbors also suggests that a study it commissioned of "the nightclub/lounge’s anticipated effects on traffic, parking and noise suggests substantial adverse impacts" and that the public benefits would be trivial, and "pale in comparison" to those impacts.

The public interest?

If an applicant for a liquor license is within 500 feet of three or more licensed premises--as is the case with Kemistry--the SLA must affirmatively determine that granting the license would be in the “public interest.”

The memo from an SLA administrative law judge after the 500-foot hearing last November described Kemistry as "a restaurant/lounge serving Cajun cuisine," with "live music provided by a four-piece jazz band."

Some fuzziness emerged: "There will be no dancing, except the Applicant reserves the right to obtain a catering license for private events that may include dancing. Bottled liquor will be served to large parties"--an undefined term--"if requested in lieu of individual drinks."

Kemistry declared that its license would be in the public interest:
"We will provide a unique Cajun menu with a 3 to 4 piece jazz band performing for the listening entertainment of the diners, which are not available in this area.”
PPN responds that such offerings are hardly exceptional:
Little need be said about the “3 to 4 piece jazz band” performing for Kemistry’s diners. Both Sugarcane and Woodland have jazz brunches on weekends, so that experience is neither unique nor unavailable to the immediate local community. (As a corollary, if Kemistry intends to feature live music at times other than during the Sunday jazz brunch it mentions, it should disclose the duration and frequency with which it plans to have live music.)
Also, PPN points out that Kemistry's self-described “unique Cajun menu” contains apparently two Cajun dishes, while Two Boots restaurant, not far away in Park Slope, offers a full Cajun menu.

PPN points to disingenuousness on the part of the applicant, noting:
  • Kemistry to CB6 provided a menu including cocktails, but redacted that cocktail list in the menu it submitted to SLA
  • Kemistry won't employ a chef, which belies any professed focus on food
  • Kemistry appears to devote about 6% of its floor plan to food preparation and storage, far less than nearby restaurants and bar/restaurants.
The issue of bottle service

The PPN submission cites a letter from Assemblywoman Joan Millman, who noted:
Kemistry Lounge wishes to be the second establishment in Brooklyn too offer bottle service. Bottle service drastically increases patrons’ incentive to drink and promotes dangerous levels of drunkenness.
PPN adds:
Kemistry has not only failed to advance any kind of security plan, but its application indicates that it doesn’t intend to engage any security personnel at all. It is a recipe for disaster.
Impact on streets

A PPN consultant observed "that the local street network forces a majority of the new traffic onto Prospect Place and then onto other narrow, residential streets in the neighborhood," with Prospect Place both being the first place arriving patrons from the north would turn back north for parking, as well as the most likely route for taxis and car-services.

Thus, traffic on the residential street could double during late night weekday and weekend periods

In a stipulation, Kemistry agreed to notify in writing any car service it engages that they may not idle, wait, drop off or pick up passengers on Prospect Place, Sixth Avenue, or St. Marks Avenue, adn that any other car service or taxi should be instructed similarly.

I think that, based on the experience of car service companies serving patrons at the Barclays Center, that would be very hard to guarantee--even if Kemistry committed to such instructions, there's no way to enforce it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …