Skip to main content

The mysteries of after-hours work at the arena site: do people live nearby? (yes, but most permits say "no") and what's the rationale? (not made public)

Since February, contractors at the Atlantic Yards arena block have 36 times gained after-hours variance (AHV) permits for work at the Atlantic Yards arena block, according to documents available via the Department of Buildings (DOB) web site.

Nine of those instances regarded weekday work that began early or went to a second shift, and 27 regarded weekend work. No 24-hour variance has been granted yet, though the July 18 Construction Update, prepared by developer Forest City Ratner and issued by the Empire State Development Corporation, suggested one might be sought.

Lingering questions

According to the online versions of those permits--the site is known as 620 Atlantic Avenue or 2-6 Fifth Avenue--two things stood out:
  • Arena builder Hunt Construction, more than three-quarters of the time, apparently stated that there were no residences within 200 feet of the site. (Yes, there are--see photo below by Tracy Collins, looking west from the corner of Dean Street and Sixth Avenue. As discussed below, Hunt asserts that the permits it files always acknowledge there are residences within 200 feet. Without seeing the original documents, that statement will remain a question mark.)
  • No rationale for the after-hours work was publicly provided. Yes, applications to the DOB must contain such a rationale, but apparently the DOB does not make that information public.
I tried to learn more, but didn't get too far.


What they must tell DOB

The application instructions (below) require, among other things:
  • Indicate if there is a residence within 200 feet of the site by checking the appropriate box.
  • Provide the date(s), hours of the day, and a brief description of the work to be done after hours broken down by weekday and weekend.
  • Indicate the reason for variance by providing a brief explanation as to why the work is necessary for the specified weekday and/or weekend date(s).
What's the reason? Lost at the DOB

The reason for the variance is part of the application form, but not part of the permit made public.

(I'm sure it's something like: We want to get our work done faster, even though we're ahead of schedule, in case we face bad weather, strikes or other unforeseen delays. In other words, maximum productivity.)

On Tuesday, I tried to find that out. I tried first as a regular citizen. I called the Brooklyn Borough Office Customer Service number. The voicemail box was full, and I was then automatically transferred to a nonworking number.

I called the DOB's Interactive Voice System and eventually spoke to a person who, after being shown the reference number for the site, understood my query and told me to call the Brooklyn Borough Manager.

I did so; he was out, but the woman answering the phone told me the information was at the Commissioner's Office.

How could I get that?

Are you the owner or contractor, I was asked.

I said no.

Then you have no access to the reason, I was told. Then she hung up on me.

I called the press office. The phone rang and rang, then was shunted off into a busy signal. I then sent an email to a DOB press person and to the DOB's Twitter account. No response.

Looking at the variances

The most recent variance, issued 8/4/11, regards weekday work 5 am to 11 pm this week:
Description of Work: (Atlantic Yards) Excavate and backfill foundations, formwork and rebar installation at foundations, spray fireproofing, ductwork installation, plumbing rough-in, electrical rough-in, steel erection and detailing. Deliveries (from 5am - 7pm ONLY)
The posted certificate is below.
After Hours Work Variance Permit, for Barclays Center, 8/8/11 - 8/12/11

Residence within 200 feet?

Note that according to this permit, Hunt Construction indicated that a residence is within 200 feet of the site.

A nearly similar request for such a permit, with the checkoff indicating that a residence was not within 200 feet, was revoked 8/2/11. (I suspect it wasn't the 200-foot issue, but more likely that the description of work in the earlier request did not include "steel erection and detailing.")

The previous week's request, dated 7/29/11, for weekday work 5 am to 11 pm, described similar work at the site, but indicated no residence is within 200 feet of the site.


Querying Hunt/FCR

I contacted Hunt Construction two days ago to learn more about this--did they make a mistake? do they classify "site" differently each week?--and got a response yesterday via Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco.

"[T]he contractor has gone back and reviewed and they have consistently noted that all work on the project and all permits filed for the same occur within 200 feet of residences," he wrote.

I sent back several screenshots, like the one above, indicating that the DOB, at least online, reports information to the contrary.

DePlasco said he'd check again--so if I get any more information I'll update it. (Could Hunt be wrong? Could the DOB have mis-applied the information when it went online?)

The DOB expects candor. According to the application (below), those filling it out state:
I understand that if I am found after hearing to have knowingly or negligently made a false statement or to have knowingly or negligently falsified or allowed to be falsified any certificate, form, signed statement, application, report or certification of the correction of a violation required under the provisions of this code or of a rule of any agency, I may be barred from filing further applications or documents with the Department.
Previous variances

Listed below are links to previous variances, with the words NO and YES appended to indicate the applicant's response to whether a residence is within 200 feet of the site.

8/2/11: for weekend work 5 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

7/29/11: for weekend work 5 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday YES (An earlier request, dated 7/26/11, was revoked, likely because the Saturday work was to start at 7 am. The check-off said. NO.)

7/19/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

7/19/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

7/12/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

7/12/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

7/6/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

7/6/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

6/29/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

6/29/11: for four days of weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

6/21/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm YES

6/21/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday and Sunday YES

6/14/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

6/14/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

6/7/11:  for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

6/7/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

5/31/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

5/17/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday YES

5/10/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday and Sunday NO

5/2/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday and Sunday NO

4/29/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday and Sunday NO
(That had previously been revoked 4/27/11, with a NO check-off.)

4/19/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm YES

4/15/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO
(A previous request for work from 10 am to 4 pm, dated 4/12/11, was revoked, with a NO check-off.)

4/8/11: for weekend work Saturday 10 am to 4 pm NO

4/5/11: for weekend work Saturday 10 am to 4 pm NO

3/31/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

3/22/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

3/15/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

3/8/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm YES

3/3/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO
(This updated a 3/1/1 permit.)

2/22/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm YES

2/16/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

2/11/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

Below, I've annotated the full list. Note that the Y refers to the individual job on the closest horizontal line, except for the two jobs with the decision date 6/21/11.


The cost

Applicants must pay an initial filing fee ($100 for 1-3 days of work, $200 for 4-6 days of work, etc.), as well as a daily fee of $80 for each day of after hours work.

After Hours Work Permit Application


After Hours Work Permit Application Instructions, NYC DOB

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …