Skip to main content

Forest City finally changes Phase I definition in investor presentations, stressing intention to build on parking lot



I've written about how Forest City Ratner and Forest City Enterprises have given inconsistent and misleading definitions of what exactly constitutes Phase 1 of Atlantic Yards, using one definition for investors yet accepting another in government documents.

That has continued, in an odd way, as Forest City has belatedly changed the outline of the two phases in investor presentations. So now it signals investors that yes, it will be building sooner rather than later on the southeast block of the site, Block 1129, now occupied by a surface parking lot.

And it reminds us that, while Atlantic Yards was justified, in significant part, as removing the blight of a below-grade railyard between Pacific Street and Atlantic Avenue, that's hardly a priority.

A GIF version

The screenshots are further below, but first, a GIF.
From December 2013 and February 2014 investor presentations by Forest City Enterprises
In first, with light background, Phase 1 is west of Sixth Avenue; in second, Phase 1 has light blue back back shading

Background

Officially, the division between phases is clear. According to the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC, or ESD), in documents like the 2009 Modified General Project Plan, the "portion of the Project Site west of 6th Avenue" constitutes Phase 1. The site east of 6th Avenue would be Phase 2.

In the graphic at right, the outlines of Phase 1 and Phase 2 are indicated by horizontal lines at the top. I annotated the map in red to show how Forest City has said it considers Block 1129 the next development site after the arena block.

Thus, for Forest City's business purposes, it's become part of Phase 1, since it doesn't require significant infrastructure investment (new permanent railyard, deck) to build over the railyard north of Pacific Street.

Nor does it require the acquisition (potentially via eminent domain) of private homes to build Building 15, the solo tower just east of Sixth Avenue between Dean and Pacific Streets.

But no government document acknowledges that.

Forest City's statements

The first inkling came when Forest City Ratner executive MaryAnne Gilmartin in October 2012 told investment analysts "we have seven buildings that we will build before we commence construction on any platform buildings."

That  indicated that Forest City had no immediate plans to build over the below-grade railyard, the clearest evidence of blight, though blight removal was a main justification for the use of eminent domain.

In the FCE annual report 10-K filed in March 2013 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company offered a new interpretation of the Atlantic Yards phases. The annual report stated:
Phase I of Brooklyn Atlantic Yards is comprised of eight buildings totaling approximately 3.4 million square feet—four buildings on the Arena Block (adjacent to the Barclays Center ) and four buildings on Block 1129. Phase II consists of seven buildings totaling approximately 3.3 million square feet—three buildings on Block 1120, three buildings on Block 1121 and one building on Block 1128.
After I reported on this, the New York Observer got a convoluted explanation from Forest City:
“The four buildings on Block 1129 are still, as they have always been, part of Phase II,” spokesman Joe DePlasco told The Observer. Sequencing for Phase II, he added, had yet to be determined and would be discussed as part of the environmental impact studies.
But what of the seeming discrepancy between Block 1129 being designated as part of Phase I in the annual report?
Mr. DePlasco cited a tangle of legalese, but the takeaway was that different documents “have different descriptions for different purposes.”
In other words, they can say whatever they want.

Forest City's recent Form 10-KT annual report, filed 2/27/14, contained the same language about the two phases.

December 2013: Phase 1 west of Sixth Avenue

Oddly, Forest City neglected to update its investor presentations to conform with its rhetoric.

Slide presentations from October 2012, December 2012April 2013June 2013July 2013 as well as the slide below from December 2013, adapted the ESDC graphic, in which Sixth Avenue remained the dividing line.

Investor Presentation, December 2013
(Note the, while buildings at far west are in yellow, indicating office use, the buildings can become housing, as well.)

February 2014: Phase I leapfrogs to Block 1129

By contrast, the investor presentation released 2/27/14 looks different. The light blue background shading in the bottom right clearly indicates that Forest City considers Block 1129 to be part of Phase I.
Investor Presentation, February 2014
Block 1129 not in initial plans

One irony, of course, is that initial plans in 2003 for Atlantic Yards completely omitted the southeast block, as indicated in the graphic at right.

The site was limited to the arena block and then the two blocks to the east above Pacific containing the rest of the Vanderbilt Yard.

That block was added later, likely because Forest City needed space for construction staging and interim parking--and for even more development.

Early plans to build on Block 1129

Note that, while not part of the documents used in the official approval process, a plan to build on Block 1129 in Phase 1 has actually been contemplated by Forest City Ratner for a long time.

Consider the graphic below, from the Memorandum of Understanding the developer signed 2/18/05 with the city and state. (The yellow Phase 1 not only included the southeast block, it also included the Building 15 site, which was expected to provide construction staging for the arena block, and thus would have been available for rapid development.)


Phasing shifts

By June 2005, as indicated in the graphic below from the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement, the phasing shifted, with Sixth Avenue as the dividing line.


That dividing line persisted in all official approval documents, including the September 2005 Draft Scope of Analysis for an environmental impact statement:
As described earlier, Phase I would consist of development of the arena blocks (Blocks 1118, 1119, and 1127), which are bounded by Atlantic Avenue to the north, Sixth Avenue to the east, Dean Street to the south, and Flatbush Avenue to the west, and Site 5 (Block 927), which is bounded by Atlantic Avenue to the north, Flatbush Avenue to the east, Pacific Street to the south, and Fourth Avenue to the west. The blocks on the eastern part of the project site (Blocks 1120, 1121, 1128, and 1129) would be built out during Phase II. 
The official dividing line persists today.

But it's irrelevant to Forest City Ratner's business purposes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.