Skip to main content

Times: Forest City's trying to sell up to 80% of Atlantic Yards (and didn't extended deadlines help Ratner gain "layup"?)

The New York Times's Charles Bagli, who has the best connections in real estate coverage but has rarely made Atlantic Yards a priority, has a sort-of scoop, To Enhance Atlantic Yards, a Plan to Sell a Big Part of It (amplifying a story in a trade paper):

Now, the developer Bruce C. Ratner, executive chairman of Forest City Ratner Companies, is looking for an investor to buy up to 80 percent of the rest of the $5 billion Atlantic Yards development in Brooklyn, which is to eventually include 14 residential buildings and 6,000 apartments near Atlantic and Flatbush Avenues.
Real estate analysts speculate that Mr. Ratner’s company could reap as much as $800 million from the sale of 50 to 80 percent of the remaining project.
Well, that's an estimate, but if Forest City has invested about $500 million in cash, as the company said in June, that looks like a rather significant profit.

So that's a pretty generous headline--"enhance Atlantic Yards"--as opposed to "cash out/make profit."

Of course the math is very crude--how much of that outlay is direct, how much is financing costs, how have they been able to get lower interest rates. And there's the lack of (large) return on their investment over ten years.

But the developer also gets a 5% development fee and would, of course, retain revenues from its share of the project.  (Note that the Observer's Stephen Jacob Smith disagrees that Ratner will necessarily do well.)

Also, while the Barclays Center may not be profitable yet, it's surely on the road to profit, and Ratner's 20% stake in the Brooklyn Nets has grown in value.

Everything ultimately for sale

The New York Post added clarity on timing:
The investment, which is being pitched by CBRE to such targets as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, will likely be structured over five years in several phases of equity as it comes time to develop more of the buildings, according to a story in Real Estate Alert, which first reported on the matter.
The sale shouldn't be a complete surprise. As CFO Bob O'Brien said in March, "I often say that everything is ultimately for sale, at a price, and if we can get full value in some of our core markets or products, that's what we would consider."

Accelerated development?

The Times reports:
“The money will be invested in the Atlantic Yards project,” said MaryAnne Gilmartin, chief executive of Forest City Ratner. “We’ll retain our position as the managing member. It’s exciting; it raises the possibility that we’ll be able to accelerate vertical development there.”
Unmentioned in the article is the ongoing Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) ordered by a state judge.

In the process, project critics have argued that either Forest City Ratner be held to the original ten-year timetable--which the state agreed to extend to 25 years--or to have the various sites within the project bid out to various developers.

Forest City's planned sale may be aimed, in part, to counter that criticism and to suggest that the developer, with partners, could build faster than anyone else. The Daily News reported:
"We are building in one of the hottest markets in the world," Forest City Ratner CEO MaryAnne Gilmartin said. "Given the strength of the market and the value represented by the Atlantic Yards project, we believe this is an excellent opportunity to gauge the interest of potential financial partners."
Previous promises

Gilmartin said in September 2010, as noted in the video below,"Let me be clear. Forest City is a company with great determination and deep roots in Brooklyn. We are 100% committed to delivering the entire Atlantic Yards project and all of its benefits, to the borough of Brooklyn."



Already, they've diminished the benefits--in terms of overall construction wages--by choosing modular construction. Also, they've reneged on promises to ensure that 50% of the affordable units, in floor area, be devoted to two- and three-bedroom units.

The modular gambit

It's interesting--gutsy or risky, take your pick--for them to put Atlantic Yards on the market before they've proven, or disproven the success of modular construction. But the five-year process would give them time.

Actually, they've suggested that the cost savings would not necessarily come on the first building, but with the pipeline, so maybe the first building will not be dispositive--and they won't close the deal until that first tower proves sturdy.

Most buildings on railyard? Nope

The Times reports:
Most of the 14 remaining residential buildings would have to be built atop a concrete and steel platform over a railroad yard. The completion date for those buildings has been pushed back, angering opponents and some supporters who believed that the housing was the project’s most critical component, because more than 30 percent of the units would be set aside for poor- and moderate-income families. Under an agreement with the state, Forest City will face millions in fines if it fails to build the residential part of the project.
Actually, the fines are quite gentle once you get past the first towers, around the railyard,, though the Times get some credit for noting that some supporters are frustrated.

There would only be six of 14 residential buildings over the railyard, not "most." (And there would be 15 remaining buildings, though one or two might be offices or mixed-use.) [Update: The Times corrected the "most" error.]

Note that Forest City already announced plans to leapfrog the railyard and build four towers on terra firma--the southeast block that's the parking lot.

The key here is that "The completion date for those buildings has been pushed back," which is a euphemism for Forest City renegotiating settled deals with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Empire State Development Corporation.

Didn't the Times describe Bruce Ratner just last September as having a reputation "for promising anything to get a deal, only to renegotiate relentlessly for more favorable terms"?

Forest City takes all the risk?

The Times reports:
William Shanahan and Darcy Stacom of CBRE, a real estate company, have started marketing the property. Word of the potential sale appeared in Real Estate Alert, an investment newsletter, on Tuesday. Paul Adornato, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets, said that the property should attract a lot of interest.
...Mr. Adornato said of Forest City: “This is consistent with what they do. They’ll take all the risk at the early stage of a project. Once they create value, they look to monetize that by bringing in investors. The layup will be to build the rest of the Yards as the market allows.”
Eric McClure (ex-No Land Grab) commented on the Times web site:
"They’ll take all the risk at the early stage of a project."
Correction: The taxpayers took on all the risk.
To be fair, the developer took what seemed to some as a significant risk. But they sure hedged it. And that was enough risk to become situated to bring in more conservative investors.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.