Skip to main content

Forest City Enterprises' first Corporate Social Responsibility Report gets Atlantic Yards wrong, ignores Ridge Hill, omits data on campaign contributions, displacement, government assistance

Forest City Enterprises, parent of Forest City Ratner, on Aug. 27 released Built on Purpose, its first Corporate Social Responsibility Report. According to the press release:
Forest City Enterprises, Inc., (NYSE: FCEA and FCEB) today announced that the company has released its first Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Report. Titled "Built on Purpose," the report received an Application Level B in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G3.1 Guidelines. GRI is the leading global framework for CSR reporting.
Such technical gobbledygook doesn't tell us anything, but the report, according to the press release, "highlights Forest City's many significant accomplishments, including:
  • More than 30 LEED-certified buildings completed or planned
  • Associate contributions totaling more than $630,000 to the United Way in 2012
  • $6 million in energy efficiency savings since 2011
  • Over six megawatts of renewable power capacity installed
What's missing: click to enlarge
The document (full report) highlights Forest City Ratner's contributions after Superstorm Sandy, as well.

What's missing

The report offers one page on Atlantic Yards, with information that is oddly stale and misleading, as I'll describe below.

More importantly, there are certain aspects of the Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines that Forest City chooses to ignore, and they touch on some of the most sensitive aspects of a corporation that relies on public-private partnerships:
  • Total value of financial and in-kind contributions to political parties, politicians, and related institutions by country.
  • Operations with significant potential or actual negative and positive impacts on local communities.
  • Prevention and mitigation measures implemented in operations with significant potential or actual negative impacts on local communities.
  • Number of persons voluntarily and involuntarily displaced and/or resettled by development, broken down by project.
  • Significant financial assistance received from government. 
What's missing: click to enlarge
Does this have to do with "Application Level B"? Can't tell. But it's a major gap.

What about corruption?

Also note "no reported incidents of corruption during the [2012] reporting period." Well, in 2012, there happened to be a big corruption trial regarding Forest City Ratner's Ridge Hill project in Yonkers.

The company was not charged, but its ethics were questionable.

As I reported, Forest City's agreement to pay a fixer after he got a City Council Member to change her vote, however legal, sounded close to a violation of parent Forest City Enterprises' Code of Legal and Ethical Conduct, which warns against any “bribe, kickback or other improper payment.” (Both the fixer and the ex-lawmaker were convicted of corruption.)

Regarding Atlantic Yards

The page (below) regarding the Atlantic Yards project begins:
The $4.9-billion Atlantic Yards project is one of the most important public/private development initiatives in New York City today. This groundbreaking 27-acre, mixed-use project will create a vibrant, sustainable, 24/7 destination featuring a new home for the Brooklyn Nets, office space, housing, open space and substantial community benefits. Situated in the heart of Downtown Brooklyn, at the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues, the project’s 17 buildings will span more than seven city blocks. The Barclays Center, a state-of-the-art, multi-purpose, 18,000-seat sports and entertainment venue brings the Nets and major professional sports back to Brooklyn. To help meet the City’s need for housing, Atlantic Yards will create more than 6,400 mixed-income residential units; 2,250 of the rental units will be designated for low- and middle-income families. The plan also includes 247,000 square feet of retail and eight acres of public open space.
Um, the site is 22 acres, not 27. The arena begins at the edge of Downtown Brooklyn and backs into Prospect Heights, with the rest of the project (except for Site 5) clearly in Prospect Heights. Atlantic Yards won't "create" anything on its own.

The document states:
In the coming year, Forest City will proceed with site preparation including the demolition of existing structures, the construction of a temporary storage yard for the MTA/Long Island Railroad, and the relocation and upgrading of public and private utilities.
Hello, the arena's open. Doesn't anyone in the Cleveland office update the file?

The document states:
History and Culture:
Forest City signed a historic, legally-binding Community Benefits Agreement [CBA] to ensure significant, on-going participation in the project by community stakeholders.
Local Economic Benefits:
An economic engine for Brooklyn, New York City and the State, Atlantic Yards will generate over $5.6 billion in new tax revenues over the next 30 years.
The project will also create thousands of new jobs: 15,000 union construction jobs, up to 6,400 permanent office jobs, as well as arena, retail and residential jobs.
Philanthropy: click to enlarge
The CBA has been significantly discredited, given the developer's failure to hire an Independent Compliance Monitor, the moribund nature of several signatories, and the closing of BUILD (Brooklyn United for Innovative Local Development).

The "economic engine" is based on a report Forest City paid for, which is based on a configuration that doesn't exist.

The projection of office jobs is based on a now-abandoned configuration of the project. The projection of construction jobs is based on a now-abandoned plan, preceding the modular plan.

About philanthropy

The document states:
Forest City’s commitment to investing in our communities is reflected both by our volunteerism and by our philanthropic contributions. We are known for our generosity.
We invest philanthropically because we care about the success of our communities. This demonstrates to our communities that we know we are linked together in a shared future. We see returns in our social license to operate, acceptance within our core market areas, and the success of our development projects.
HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR 2012 PHILANTHROPIC CONTRIBUTIONS
  • To support our commitment to diversity and inclusion, Forest City gave approximately 8% of overall charitable giving to support organizations targeting multicultural needs.
  • Super Storm Sandy caused unprecedented flooding and damage to the east coast of the United States. Forest City associates donated their time, talent and treasure to help their colleagues, neighborhoods and cities fight back from devastation of the storm. When you add in Forest City’s matching corporate donation, along with donations from our Forest City Ratner Companies (FCRC) associates in New York, our total giving to the American Red Cross was more than $55,000.
  • In New York, associates donated $7,380 to four different local charities involved in relief efforts with Forest City matching donations dollar for dollar.
  • FCRC, along with Barclays Center and the Brooklyn Nets, donated $100,000 each to the Brooklyn Recovery Fund.
That does seem generous, but... without any information regarding the company's spending on lobbying, p.r., and campaign contributions,  we really don't get to see the full picture of the developer's public presence.

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:03 PM

    Since they didn't list a total amount of donations, only a pie chart showing how it was distributed over different sectors, you're left thinking that the "highlighted" donations may be some of the biggest. And if that's the case, that is pretty darn stingy.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.