Skip to main content

Kemistry lounge (or bottle-service club) faces liquor license hearing tomorrow; neighbors slam increased hours, commitment to bottle service, disingenuous behavior

Via Park Slope Stoop
Remember Kemistry, the self-described "restaurant, bar and lounge" (or, as neighbors contend, bottle service nightclub) planned for Flatbush Avenue near Prospect Place, with a back emergency exit on a residential street?

The establishment, with a capacity for 225 people, faces a hearing before the State Liquor Authority (SLA) Wednesday, July 17, with an array of neighbors, Community Board 6, and local elected officials opposing it.

The objections focus on Kemistry's plans to stay open late every night (and until 4 am on Saturday and Sunday), its commitment to bottle service, and a pattern of apparent disingenuous behavior.

(My query to Kemistry went unanswered.)

The hearing, which includes many other applications, begins at 10 am at the SLA office at 317 Lenox Avenue near 126th Street in Harlem, near the 125th Street stop on the 2 or 3 trains. It also should be webcast.

Also see coverage in DNAInfo, which quotes neighbors' attorney Peter Adelman: "Having another bar, I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, but having this one is very bad." Note that Kemistry, while surely seeking to capitalize in part on late-night post-event crowds, likely aims to rely on a much broader clientele.

Neighbors' case

Kemistry, as noted in the CB 6 letter, came to agreement on a host of issues raised by critics, but not all. The organization Prospect Place Neighbors (PPN), via Adelman, details in a submission to the SLA three areas of conflict, part of an effort "to shoehorn an outsized club into this radically ill-suited location":
  • Kemistry entirely retreated from its initial promise to the community, CB6 and elected officials that it would “brick up” the inappropriate glass fa├žade that would face onto residential Prospect Place. At a March 26, 2012 public review session held by Community Board 6, Kemistry outright promised to “brick up” the Prospect Place exterior of the proposed nightclub/lounge, if that were necessary to allay community concerns. After later suggesting that its landlord might not permit the promised renovations (which was untrue), Kemistry finally abandoned all pretense of accommodating this intensely important community concern, recently suggesting it try to conceal its inappropriate glass frontage with “opaque, soundproof curtains.” 
  • Kemistry refused to scale back on its proposed hours of operation in recognition of its sensitive, semi-residential location. Remarkably, it has instead proposed progressively longer hours, recently (and brazenly) proposing to stay open on school nights as late as 4:00 a.m., and no earlier than 2:00 a.m. 
  • Kemistry has doggedly continued to insist upon providing hard-liquor bottle service, despite widespread opposition to this roundly disfavored practice. And as if to make a mockery of concerned community members, elected officials and this Authority, after months of adamantly refusing to negotiate its intention to provide hard liquor bottle service, in its recently-filed application, Kemistry now claims “not to understand what Bottle Service means.” 
Note that, while there's no statutory definition of "bottle service," it's a fairly well-known concept, offered by, among other outlets, branches of Jay-Z's 40/40 Club.

During the process, Kemistry's proposed hours have expanded. The proposal emerged in March 2012, when a CB 6 committee considered the application, which at that point proposed no Sunday hours, and Mon-Wed hours until 11 pm, (rather than 2 pm as of now), Thursday until 1 am (rather than 3 am now), and Friday until 2 (rather than 3:30 am now), and Saturday until 3:30 (rather than 4 am now).

Prospect Place Neighbors also suggests that a study it commissioned of "the nightclub/lounge’s anticipated effects on traffic, parking and noise suggests substantial adverse impacts" and that the public benefits would be trivial, and "pale in comparison" to those impacts.

The public interest?

If an applicant for a liquor license is within 500 feet of three or more licensed premises--as is the case with Kemistry--the SLA must affirmatively determine that granting the license would be in the “public interest.”

The memo from an SLA administrative law judge after the 500-foot hearing last November described Kemistry as "a restaurant/lounge serving Cajun cuisine," with "live music provided by a four-piece jazz band."

Some fuzziness emerged: "There will be no dancing, except the Applicant reserves the right to obtain a catering license for private events that may include dancing. Bottled liquor will be served to large parties"--an undefined term--"if requested in lieu of individual drinks."

Kemistry declared that its license would be in the public interest:
"We will provide a unique Cajun menu with a 3 to 4 piece jazz band performing for the listening entertainment of the diners, which are not available in this area.”
PPN responds that such offerings are hardly exceptional:
Little need be said about the “3 to 4 piece jazz band” performing for Kemistry’s diners. Both Sugarcane and Woodland have jazz brunches on weekends, so that experience is neither unique nor unavailable to the immediate local community. (As a corollary, if Kemistry intends to feature live music at times other than during the Sunday jazz brunch it mentions, it should disclose the duration and frequency with which it plans to have live music.)
Also, PPN points out that Kemistry's self-described “unique Cajun menu” contains apparently two Cajun dishes, while Two Boots restaurant, not far away in Park Slope, offers a full Cajun menu.

PPN points to disingenuousness on the part of the applicant, noting:
  • Kemistry to CB6 provided a menu including cocktails, but redacted that cocktail list in the menu it submitted to SLA
  • Kemistry won't employ a chef, which belies any professed focus on food
  • Kemistry appears to devote about 6% of its floor plan to food preparation and storage, far less than nearby restaurants and bar/restaurants.
The issue of bottle service

The PPN submission cites a letter from Assemblywoman Joan Millman, who noted:
Kemistry Lounge wishes to be the second establishment in Brooklyn too offer bottle service. Bottle service drastically increases patrons’ incentive to drink and promotes dangerous levels of drunkenness.
PPN adds:
Kemistry has not only failed to advance any kind of security plan, but its application indicates that it doesn’t intend to engage any security personnel at all. It is a recipe for disaster.
Impact on streets

A PPN consultant observed "that the local street network forces a majority of the new traffic onto Prospect Place and then onto other narrow, residential streets in the neighborhood," with Prospect Place both being the first place arriving patrons from the north would turn back north for parking, as well as the most likely route for taxis and car-services.

Thus, traffic on the residential street could double during late night weekday and weekend periods

In a stipulation, Kemistry agreed to notify in writing any car service it engages that they may not idle, wait, drop off or pick up passengers on Prospect Place, Sixth Avenue, or St. Marks Avenue, adn that any other car service or taxi should be instructed similarly.

I think that, based on the experience of car service companies serving patrons at the Barclays Center, that would be very hard to guarantee--even if Kemistry committed to such instructions, there's no way to enforce it.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.