Skip to main content

Barclays Center round-up: boxing card hype (and failed drug test/free tickets); the area "urinal" ( & bigger issues); NY mag's myopic critic; and that "satarical" Atlantic Yards novel

Well, the Barclays Center news of the day focuses on promotion for the first boxing card at the arena, tomorrow, Oct. 20. (Oh, the Nets lost for the first time in four games, soundly. The announced attendance, though not necessarily gate count, was 14,192, slightly less than at the first home game.)

Columnist Tim Smith of the Daily News--sponsor of the arena plaza--cheerleads today, in Danny Jacobs return from cancer just one of the many impressive stories to continue at inaugural boxing showcase at Barclays Center:
From top to bottom it is a boxing card that speaks to the core of what Brooklyn is all about - everyone thrown into a melting pot and looking for a chance to succeed.
Even the inspirational comeback of Danny Jacobs, who was paralyzed by cancer that attacked his back in 2011, is pure Brooklyn. When he was introduced to speak at the press conference, Jacobs received a standing ovation.
“Danny Jacobs speaks to the boldness, the grittiness and the determination of Brooklyn,” said Brett Yormark, CEO of the Barclays Center. “What he’s done deserves a big hand.”
Also speaking to Brooklyn--and the "culture of cheating" around Atlantic Yards--is the fact that junior welterweight challenger Erik Morales failed a drug test, but the fight will go on, according to ESPN.

Brooklyn in the house

Brooklyn, however, is not paying $56 and change to fill the arena. Yormark had to give out 1,000 free tickets to the boxing match to make it look halfway full, and arena operators are still trying.

Last night at the second monthly community sweepstakes for ticket distribution, organized by the Downtown Brooklyn Neighborhood Alliance, Janella Meeks, Deputy Director, Government & Public Affairs for Brooklyn Sports & Entertainment, gave out more than 40 more free tickets to the boxing event. I suspect more of that is going on.

Park Slope a urinal?

Everybody likes to write about pee.

An article based on the Oct. 16 community meeting on arena impacts, Barclays Center Patrons Urinate All Over Park Slope, Locals Say provoked re-blogging in Curbed, Barclays Center Turns Park Slope Into a Huge Urinal and The Atlantic Cities, Brooklyn's Barclays Center Sponsors 2012 Urinebowl, and The Real Deal, Around Barclays Center, neighbors complain of public urination.

Yes, there's a pee problem on Pacific Street between Flatbush and Third Avenue, and on a few blocks in Fort Greene and Prospect Heights. But that's not "all over Park Slope." Nor are residents finding "something to complain about," as one summary put it, they're reacting understandably to disruptions in their lives.

But the issue goes well beyond urine jokes. As Michael D. D. White pointed out in his Noticing New York blog, most of the untoward impacts--limos idling, trucks on residential streets, flashing ads all night--relate to the zoning override that allows the arena to be located less than 200 feet from a residential area.

So, no matter how many major problems have been avoided, there's little margin for error, which is why the state and developer need to be held accountable.

More from Noticing New York

Also, in White's 10/16/12 post, “Barclays”? Atlantic Yards?: On Lopate, NY Mag Architectural Critic Justin Davidson Disses Brooklyn Neighborhoods With Manhattancentric Illiteracy, he slammed Davidson's statement, "I would say that there was no character right on that site, and that’s a good place to have a really bold muscular building that does intrude, that does change things." Actually, there there were newly renovated residential buildings on the arena block.

As for the overall site plan, which Davidson said was "based on that a lot of the . . uhm . . public monies and the incentives were put into place"--not really--White countered:
Every time Ratner comes back to government officials looking to change his deal he gets more subsidy and diminished obligations to the public.
As for a binding “site plan,” consider what Davidson describes in his article about the Hudson Yards mega-project that’s on the drawing boards:
Architects discuss access points, sidewalk widths, ceiling heights, flower beds, and the qualities of crushed-stone pathways. You could almost forget that none of this exists yet—until one architect points to a lozenge-shaped skyscraper and casually, with a twist of his wrist, remarks that he's thinking of swiveling it 90 degrees.
It’s not any different with Atlantic Yards at this point either.
You must read Davidson’s recent article on Hudson Yards as a check against his stunningly casual acceptance of the Atlantic Yards situation. In that article Davidson conveys many misgivings with respect to the sole ownership of Hudson Yards by the Related Companies, misgivings that should also apply to the plan for the larger Ratner Atlantic Yards mega-monopoly in spades with many more misgivings added on top. But he doesn’t make the connections. . Woe is us. Woe to Brooklyn. (See: Friday, October 12, 2012, Justin Davidson’s New York Magazine Review Of Hudson Yards Echos Concerns Raised By NNY, But Does So Without Mentioning Obvious Atlantic Yards Parallels.)
A novel from the notorious Courier-Life scribe

From Metro (home of the Barclays Center "tidbits"), A satarical [sic] take on Atlantic Yards
No matter which side of the Atlantic Yards debate you’re on, Steve Witt’s new satire of the controversy is worth a read. Longtime Brooklyn journalist Witt covered the Atlantic Yards saga from its beginning, and it’s now the subject of his latest book, “The Street Singer.”

Q: What do you say to criticism that the Barclays Center took people’s homes away, via eminent domain, and that developer Ratner has yet to deliver on the jobs and affordable housing he promised?
As a journalist, I seldom bought into the eminent domain argument concerning Atlantic Yards. The gentrified few nearly killed the project with their endless court battles with eminent domain being among their trump cards. But they themselves displaced poor people to get property around Atlantic Yards. As for the affordable housing and jobs, Ratner’s style is to build and not flip real estate, so I think it will get done.
My comment:
Mr. Witt styles himself as a tribune of the people. What has always escaped him is the "culture of cheating" surrounding Atlantic Yards. See the "Atlantic Yards and the Culture of Cheating" post on my Atlantic Yards Report blog for more.

Mr. Witt's near-final comment reminds me of an article he wrote quoting people as saying those living in converted industrial buildings were "the real land-grabbers," since they had taken jobs from the community. Those buildings had been closed for years.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…