Skip to main content

Markowitz has his (wrong) mantra: Atlantic Yards area "not a bedroom community" (and project will be a "masterpiece of urban planning")

Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz sure has chutzpah. His latest mantra, repeated in at least three interviews, is that those living near the Barclays Center arena, or displaced, should not be complaining. In the 9/21/12 Crain's New York Business, he declared:
"Time will soothe ruffled feathers," he said. "I do not believe this is a bedroom community."
In the comments, Dean Street resident Tracy Collins replied, with links:
Literally right across Dean Street and 6th Avenue from the arena are many actual bedrooms.
What Markowitz ignores is that the state overrode city zoning barring sports facilities from wthin 200 feet of residential districts.

In New York magazine

A major feature on Brooklyn in this week's New York magazine reports:
If I were in any danger of forgetting this Big City koan, Marty Markowitz was there to remind me. “All this talk about ‘the neighborhood,’ ” Markowitz postured. “These people moved into brownstones on Dean Street because it was cheap. They thought they found paradise because they got out of Manhattan. What they’d really moved to was a business district, a place that had always been a business district, except they didn’t know with that hole in the ground at Atlantic Yards. But a business district is for business, and now, thank God, it is doing business. If these people wanted to move to a bedroom community, they should have gone to Mill Basin. Marine Park. Bay Ridge. Those are bedroom communities. Brooklyn has many wonderful bedroom communities! But the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenue is not one of them.”
True enough. But the back and south side of the arena, and the area between the arena and its surface parking lot--those are bedroom communities. And there wasn’t a “hole in the ground at Atlantic Yards.”

On Channel 7

Markowitz appeared yesterday on Channel 7 with Diana Williams, Up Close: The Barclays Center, which began with this intro, "Many are confident that this project will change the face of Brooklyn, but there are still nonbelievers." (It also called the arena $450 million--more like $800 million or, if you count extras, the developer's nice $1 billion figure, and claimed--in a stretch--"more than $2 billion in taxpayer subsidies.")

"When I heard words like the soul of Brooklyn is over," Markowitz declared, "I don't know what they're talking about... give me a break. What's going on in Brooklyn now, the renaissance of the borough, is unbelievable and wonderful. You have to accept change, you don't want it to stay the same, year in and year out. This is a positive, wonderful development, and these folks, some of them are misguided, they have their own agenda, their own NIMBYism, because if it had been in some other area of Brooklyn, I would've heard from none of them. Listen, we live in a great country, America... but we're gonna prove them wrong."

In his statement about change, Markowitz sounded like he was channeling Mayor Mike Bloomberg.

Would you say the courts delayed the project, he was asked.

"No question," he replied, "and that is the strategy of those that opposed that arena.. and that is their right... by the way, I respect those that disagree... but I'm looking ahead, and I'm thinking of all the positive benefits."

Markowitz as architecture critic

He was asked: what you think of the arena?

"The inside is stunning... The outside"--he paused--"is interesting. And I have to tell you: beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.. I'm still absorbing it. By the way, those that are architecture specialists love the look of the building.. what they try to get across... it's showing that Brooklyn is gritty and cutting-edge at the same time... I think they succeeded in relating the arena... getting a feeling of 1800s, early 1900s... Listen, like I said, it's really how you look at it." (Bruce Ratner has called it the city's first truly 21st-century building.)

"Most important is the project itself," Markowitz continued. "By the way the [presumably night] lighting, is stupendous, it's gorgeous."

The neighborhood

Host Williams asked Markowitz whether he'd seen change.

"That immediate area used to be an open pit," Markowitz said, glossing over the fact that a large majority of the "open pit," the working Vanderbilt Yard, not only remains, but has not been paid for by Forest City. "It was railroad yards for over a 100-odd years... it was an area at one time with prostitution, drugs, crime, you name it. It was a derelict place. then, over the last number of years, no question that the area showed significant improvement."

This was an implicit acknowledgment that eminent domain was not needed to remove blight.

"What this project has done is bring together the communities and create a masterpiece--it's going to be a masterpiece of urban planning," he said, ignoring the fact that no one--even people who like the arena--has dared called it an urban planning masterpiece... so what's happening is new businesses are opening up on Flatbush Avenue... many more visitors."

Housing and jobs

Williams asked if Markowitz would help Forest City get union approval to do modular construction, and he pretty much evaded the question.

"The first building, the groundbreaking will begin December. 18. Of that first building, 500 some odd apartments will be affordable," he said, inflating the number by nearly a factor of three. (It would be 181 units.)

Do you feel like this project has provided the number of jobs that were promised, he was asked.

Markowitz found his talking point: "You have to include the construction jobs, not only for the arena, but also for the buildout... we're not anywhere near that... you have to think about all the additional jobs, making the steel... and the rest of the project. There's approximately 2000 folks working full and part-time in the arena... and the jobs that are going to be created."

A lot of these jobs are part-time jobs, Williams pointed out.

"Indeed, some are," Markowitz responded. "Indeed some are, with benefits." That's not what Forest City Ratner said.

Broken promises?

Is it what people were promised?

"When these promises were made, it was a different era, it was a different economy... you can't look at it through the initial promises," Markowitz said, as if suggesting that all promises for projects that are expected to go through economic cycles should  be seen as provisional.

"Forest City Ratner wants to keep every single promise, fully," he said, disregarding that modular construction would cut significantly on compensation for construction workers and, likely, positions. "It's going to be a great project."

Williams pointed out it could take 25 years.

"If the economy gets stronger, it'll be a shorter period of time," Markowitz responded. "The only barometers I have is new businesses are opening up... home prices are up like this... people want to live in an area that's right next to Brooklyn Academy of Music... great culture."

His future

What next for him?

"I don't know," Markowitz responded. "For the first time in my life, I always had another election... and now I may not have the next election.. it's hard to explain... but I hope it will be something in public service."

Comments

  1. His next job will be to work as an impressario for Barclays Center.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:26 AM

    Markowitz is correct, at least on this point. The AY area is primarily commercial, or, at the least, can be characterized as mixed-use.

    It in no way resembles bedroom communities, which are communities that are overwhelemingly residential in nature, and where residents need to commute long distances for job opportunities. Most typical bedroom communities are exurban towns where homes have been built, but corresponding businesses have yet to sprout.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The point is: it's a neighborhood where people live. Sure, the convergence of Atlantic and Flatbush is commercial. But walk the entire footprint.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous1:25 PM

    I have been positive about the arena location because of the excellent public transportation which is similar to what exists for Madison Sq. Garden. The steel which rusts naturally was used years ago for the parking garage at LaGuardia airport but after many years was painted (I believe green.) I'm not sure why this was done but would be interested in knowing if the integrity of the steel itself was compromised with the rusting effect, therefore necessitating the paint job. Could the steel at this arena be a ticking time bomb?
    With regard to the rest of the Atlantic Yards project, it's a total government giveaway. Ratner won't build most of it without government subsidy in some form, so he waits yet for more benefits. Low and moderate income housing will simply not be built without 421a, bond financing or other benefits. Subsidized housing is not cheap and without more federal help, not likely, most of the site will remain undeveloped for years to come. The fact that he now seeks 25 years as a build out is proof in the pudding.
    Stadium projects with rare exception are too costly to taxpayers. Many new projects require sports franchises to provide their own financing.
    The public opposition here was strong but political leaders had no fear of losing their jobs and hence the project went ahead, all be it at
    great delay. The public's cynicism with elected officials only grows.
    Marion G

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.