Skip to main content

Capital New York's McGeveran: phase 1 of Ratner's rehabilitation is successful, but next phase will be harder; also, Hamill's "two-page gloat"

Updated with link to essay, which was not originally on the web.

Capital New York co-founder Tom McGeveran, who opposed the Atlantic Yards arena, writes in an email to subscribers, a thoughtful, more supportive-than-not essay, headlined "Bruce Ratner's apology to Brooklyn, Part One":
The builders of the Barclays Center in Brooklyn will have much to celebrate at tomorrow's ribbon cutting, having made it through legal battles, financing troubles and architectural disputes to get to the opening of the giant arena.

The mood will be different outside, where some vocal Brooklynites who opposed the arena will gather. They're the ones who protested first the seizure of property to cobble the site together and then the effect the arena would have on the sensitive intersection of residential neighborhoods like Prospect Heights, Fort Greene, Park Slope and Boerum Hill, at the crossroads of which Barclays sits.

As it turns out, the arena itself is a beautiful structure, in stark contrast to developer Bruce Ratner's previous building forays in the neighborhood. Both 1996's Atlantic Center mall and 2004's Atlantic Terminal Mall are blights, and did much to make the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic avenues feel like some windswept highway off-ramp halfway through Connecticut, in some exurban nowhere.

I'm not totally shocked that this Ratner project came out so differently because Ratner went, in the end, with SHOP, a local architectural firm that's big on both ambition and humanness. Partner Gregg Pasquarelli has the kind of genuine excitement for this project that you just don't see with rabid capitalist-architects who want to build houses for banksters.
The arena is striking, sure, and memorable. Beauty, of course, will be in the eye of the beholder, and I've heard a real spectrum of opinions already.

Ratner making amends?

McGeveran continues:
Jay-Z will be there at the opening I'm sure, and Michael Bloomberg, and of course Ratner himself, who had so much to answer for and who by several accounts knew that what he was really battling Brownstone Brooklyn for was a last chance to make amends for what he'd done to the borough already.

Now, almost bizarrely, Ratner has a chance to go down in history as one of the great builders of Brooklyn.

I should say here that I was against the project from the start. I don't believe stadiums ever bring what builders say they will, and I don't understand putting them in locations like this. Recall Ebbetts [sic] Field as fondly as you like, but these stadiums aren't built the same way anymore, they don't create the kind of traffic patterns or local business they used to. In my mind, the word "stadium" is more likely to conjure the image of a mediocre-looking pillbox across an empty parking lot studded with broken glass and blowing discarded fast-food paper products.

But that's not what Barclays looks like right now. And I think as far as phase one of Ratner's Brooklyn rehabilitation is concerned, he's been successful. Phase two is longer, and harder, and not entirely in his control.
That's a little premature. McGeveran is saluting the arena as urban sculpture, which is his right. But the arena needs to be evaluated as a working organism, as well.

What next?

And McGeveran knows that, sort of. He continues:
Having built this thing, having paid lots of money, having extracted lots of suffering and sown lots of discord in Brooklyn, what remains is to see what the arena does to Brooklyn when it's a living, breathing urban organism, sucking people in and spitting them out like some kind of artificial heart.

Will it bring higher real estate values to local owners or will it lower them? If it brings higher ones, will Ratner's promise to put a cap on the dislocation of its longtime residents by building middle-income housing ever come to fruition?
That working organism means more than real estate values. It means the impact of daily operations.

The "right level of incredulity"?

He closes:
To ask is not to doubt Ratner's motive, but to have the right level of incredulity about any of these kinds of deals, as the economy cycles up and down and the city's government prepares for a new regime. Will local store owners get more business or get pushed out? Will all the little restaurants be replaced with bank branches, nail salons, Heartland Breweries and Hooters and Applebees, or will the distinct charms of Brooklyn actually appeal to the thousands of suburbanites who travel in to watch the Brooklyn Nets, or Jay-Z, or Lady Gaga at the arena?

Tomorrow will probably be the kindest day for Ratner. Whether that all falls away is largely up to forces beyond his, or our, control. But the arena is now a fact. The Brooklynites who picketed the project should allow themselves to start supporting a home team, and a stadium, that can shape the future of the borough. And they should also not let Ratner, or the city, off the hook when it comes to the concessions they offered, and the benefits they promised.
They should allow themselves to start supporting a home team? That's a lot easier in Green Bay, where the community essentially owns the team.

The right level of incredulity, I'd submit, involves recognizing the Culture of Cheating.

Taking on Hamill's "two-page gloat"

McGeveran also wrote today, in his tabloid round-up, about the Daily News front page and Atlantic Yards coverage:
Denis Hamill has been in favor of what is now called the Barclays Center since the site was little more than a patch of weeds, and the apartments and other buildings surrounding it were still fighting off an eminent domain claim that would result in their destruction in order to build Bruce Ratner's billion-dollar Nets arena. So it comes as little surprise that Hamill should wax poetic on the eve of its ribbon-cutting.

It's a little galling that a guy whose only real angle on this all along has been getting a professional home team to Brooklyn, and to whom no cost could seem high enough for the feat, gives us this two-page gloat; it's edifying that Daniel Goldstein gets a column along the left-hand side to announce protests against the arena, opponents of which, having lost the main struggle, remain an important corrective to Ratner's behavior after the arena opens.

Cheap apartments and job creation were part of the deal, and we've seen how, once the big deal is made, these little community details can fall out of the package. Goldstein's land battle is over, but Ratner and Jay-Z and the Nets have the opportunity to decide whether this is a forever-war with Brooklyn or the carefree, happy boon to all Brooklynites Hamill has convinced himself (from a safe distance in Bayside, Queens, where he now lives) that it will be.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…