Skip to main content

Will Carlton Avenue Bridge reopen in time for arena? Maybe, as double-shift work continues. But evidence suggests it's delayed, and penalties are toothless.

January 2008 photo by Tracy Collins
Evidence--including a delayed start and a search for funding--suggests that the reconstruction of the Carlton Avenue Bridge is behind.

And that's provoked an accelerated, double-shift pace (as announced in the 12/19/11 Construction Alert) to complete the work by the time the Atlantic Yards arena is deemed substantially complete by 8/30/12.

Maybe it'll get done, even as deadlines for the arena and site work have already been pushed near their limit.

But if it doesn't--a potential "surprise" that I predicted last week--the impact likely would hit the local community far more than it would damage developer Forest City Ratner, which faces no direct penalties.

The hazards

If the arena opens without the bridge, that would set up some hazardous, frenzied conditions in Prospect Heights, notably two-way traffic on narrow Sixth Avenue bordering the Barclays Center and a bottleneck on Carlton Avenue.

Sixth Avenue, which for years was a one-way street, was converted to two-way service when the Carlton Avenue Bridge was closed. (Click on graphic at right to enlarge.)

Sixth Avenue
is supposed to be converted back to one-way service
will remain two-way, and the burden will be greater, obviously, if the Carlton Avenue Bridge doesn't reopen.

The question is when that reopening will happen.

Few penalties

The bridge reconstruction is part of an "Arena Opening Condition" required by the Atlantic Yards Development Agreement. However, failure to meet that condition would result in a rather toothless penalty: freezing of Forest City Ratner's rights to move forward on any new residential development.

However, it would not stop ongoing work, and presumably Forest City will get the first tower, Building 2, started before the arena opens.

No other state penalties, including fines, are contemplated. City penalties could kick in only beginning in 2013, after a five-year time period.

Series of delays

The delay in the bridge is part of a frustrating history. The bridge, which connects Pacific Street to Atlantic Avenue and thus Prospect Heights to Fort Greene, closed in 1/23/08. In January 2009, the Department of Transportation said the work "is scheduled for completion January 2010.

That was subsequently nudged back to January 2011, April 2012, and, as currently stated, "estimated for completion summer 2012."

(Even the tweak in terminology from "scheduled" to "estimated" might give reason for pause.)

Why the delays?

Why is it all taking so long? As I wrote 2/24/11, it's partly because Forest City Ratner is proceeding in three stages, a far slower sequence than that disclosed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).

As I wrote, Chapter 17, Construction Impacts, of the FEIS prepared by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), made no reference to such phasing. Rather, the bridge was presumed to be fully demolished and reconstructed within two years, during the construction of the temporary yard.

However, the contract terms were more generous than predicted in the FEIS. While Forest City Ratner had three years to complete the job without penalty, a clause in the contract, signed 12/17/07, provides up to five years to complete the work in case of Unavoidable Delay.

One definition of Unavoidable Delay is a delay in "completing the Master Closing," which includes the ESDC's exercise of eminent domain and the closing of a purchase and sale agreement with the MTA/LIRR for the Vanderbilt Yard. That Master Closing took place in December 2009, thus giving Forest City an extension.

Originally, as I wrote 3/1/10, the bridge was supposed to reopen by the time a temporary railyard was completed. That's long been accomplished.

A key factor in the delay was likely Forest City Ratner's effort in 2009--well after the demolition process had begun--to renegotiate plans for a smaller and less costly permanent railyard.

Delays were obscured

Did Forest City Ratner fudge the timetable? Yes, to an extent. Delays were obscured, as initial work was promised but not executed.

According to the two-week Atlantic Yards Construction Update, prepared by the developer and issued 8/30/10 by Empire State Development:
During this reporting period work related to the demolition of the Carlton Ave Bridge and the associated piers located in the north side of the existing LIRR yard located within blocks 1120 & 1121 will commence.... Work will commence upon receipt of such approvals and permits.  
That language--"will commence"--was repeated in the next updates, dated 9/13/10 and 9/27/10. But the work never began.

Perhaps that's why, in the next updates, dated 10/11/1010/25/10, and 11/8/10, the language changed to "may commence."

By 10/25/10, the language at the end of the paragraph had changed subtly:
Work will commence upon receipt of such approvals and permits which are anticipated to be in place during this  reporting period.  
Were they? It took at least two more weeks, until early November. The 11/22/10 update stated:
Work related to the demolition of the Carlton Ave Bridge and the associated piers located in the north side of the existing LIRR yard located within blocks 1120 & 1121 will continue during this period.
The implication was that it had begun in previous weeks.

The 12/6/10 update stated:
Demolition of the roadway slab of the Carlton Avenue Bridge using Hoe-Ram method has commenced.  
What FCR said

Indeed, despite the language of the Construction Alerts, Forest City Ratner officials were more candid.

At the 11/4/10 Atlantic Yards District Service Cabinet meeting, Forest City Ratner executive Maryanne Gilmartin stated that the railyard work necessary to put the Carlton Avenue Bridge back in service by the 2012 arena opening would start in December.

And, in a 12/14/10 email message to the New York City Economic Development Corporation, FCR executive Kate Bicknell stated, "Carlton Ave Bridge and related yard work--just beginning."

(I acquired the latter and the follow-up message via a Freedom of Information Law request.)

In a follow-up message 1/31/11, Bicknell stated that "the next phase of yard construction necessary for opening the Carlton Ave Bridge is underway and on track for completion prior to arena opening."

That remains in question.

Where's the money?

Meanwhile, as of 12/28/10, Forest City Ratner Bruce Bender unsuccessfully tried to get state Senator Carl Kruger, who has since pled guilty to bribery, to commit $9 million of state funds to the Carlton Avenue Bridge reconstruction, thus paying the majority of the $16 million the developer owed. (The city was already putting up $24 million.)

It's unclear where this money would come from, but the late date suggests that the developer was scrounging for it. While that's hardly proof of delays, it's another hint that the project faced challenges.

Is there any leverage? 

What leverage does the state have if the bridge is delayed? Not much, it turns out.

According to Section 8.6(b) of the Atlantic Yards Development Agreement, "the Substantial Completion (as defined in the Arena Development Lease) of the Carlton Avenue Bridge is an Arena Opening Condition." That sounds serious.

Other Arena Opening Conditions: Substantial Completion of the Urban Experience/Urban Room (which can be delayed), the Subway Entrance, and the Arena Parking.

And one "Event of Default," according to Section 17.1(f), is "the hosting of the first event at the Arena open to the general public prior to the satisfaction of the Arena Opening Conditions."

The key, however, is the penalty for such an Event of Default. It's not a fine or a stall on other development; rather, it's a likely ineffectual block on new development.

According to Section 17.2(a)(iii), upon an Event of Default described in Section 17.1(f), as well as other sections, neither Atlantic Yards Development Company nor any other developer "may request the creation or severance of any Development Parcels under this Agreement or any Interim Lease, request the execution and delivery by ESDC of any Development Lease or commence the performance of any Development Work under the applicable Development Lease."

But that would give Forest City Ratner a grace period of many months, likely well more than a year.

As long as Building 2 is started, the developer is relatively free. The next building does not have to be started for two years, according to Section 8.6(d)(i)(II).


The developer is supposed to be committed to reconstructing the bridge. From the 12/21/09 Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments for the Atlantic Yards Project, signed by Forest City Ratner to document commitments made to avoid adverse environmental impacts described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement:
Among the roadway improvements FCRC shall fund and/or implement are the following:

...4. FCRC shall construct a new entrance to the Atlantic Avenue/Pacific Street subway station complex on Block 1118...

7. FCRC shall reconstruct the Carlton Avenue Bridge so as to be functional as of the opening date of the arena.
That's what it says. It just doesn't look very enforceable.

Timetable update in November 2011

The bridge came up for discussion at the 11/3/11 meeting of the Atlantic Yards District Service Cabinet. “As far as the LIRR work is concerned, the major piece of the excavation there is complete, and we continue to do drilling to support the Carlton Avenue Bridge,” Forest City executive Bob Sanna said. “The bridge abutments are currently being constructed at the moment. We have a big pour contemplated tomorrow.”

He added that overtime continues: “We are working in a premium time program... five days a week, ten hours a day,” with an eight-hour day on Saturdays. “We're watching that schedule carefully to be complete in anticipation of the arena opening."

Later, Council Member Letitia James asked Chris Hrones of the Department of Transportation (DOT) if DOT was keeping track of the progress with the long-delayed bridge.

“Our bridges people are monitoring that project,” and looking at both the schedule and the work, Hrones replied. However, he didn’t provide any details on those conclusions.

No answer re delays

At another junction, Council Member Steve Levin asked, “Do we have a projected date of completion, and what happens if it's not open, what if you can't finish it by that time?”

“It is required to be open, and we are monitoring it very carefully,” replied Sanna, who also referenced the DOT’s role. “So we're working very aggressively to ensure that it does open.” He didn't provide a specific completion date.

Levin continued: "What if it doesn’t?"

“We're not contemplating that it will not open,” said Sanna, who noted that “the bridge structure itself is actually in fabrication... We do not anticipate that it will not open.”

“In the world of capital construction, stuff gets delayed all the time, so I’m just wondering,” Levin said.

“That has not been our track record to date,” responded Sanna.

Actually, the track record is a lot more questionable, since the bridge, of course, was originally supposed to take two years.

So stay tuned. The District Service Cabinet is supposed to meet every two months, but its first 2012 meeting, originally scheduled for last week, was postponed, and no date yet has been announced.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…