Skip to main content

What if it gets loud? State says police "will seek to control unruly behavior," but expect "significant adverse noise impacts" from traffic (though they didn't study impact on plaza nor effect on pedestrians)

The Empire State Development Corporation has posted (also embedded below) 68 questions and responses from the 6/14/11 public meeting on traffic issues.

I've already highlighted some questions and responses, including the capacity of sidewalks on Dean Street, plans for the surface parking lot, the impact of traffic on the Dean Street Playground, a post-arena opening traffic study, the Transportation Demand Management plan, and potential sidewalk closures.

Below is another question with a short answer but a longer backstory.

But what if it gets loud?

The question:
67. What are the plans to manage noise from traffic and pedestrians late at night?
The answer:
The FEIS [Final Environmental Impact Statement] determined that the Project would result in significant adverse noise impacts; thus some increase in noise is expected. Police officers patrolling Arena events will seek to control unruly behavior that would constitute an undue disturbance.
Note what's missing from "significant adverse noise impacts"--exactly who and where. Also unclear is how many officers will be available, and at what radius from the site. Will police be posted along residential Dean Street as event attendees walk back to the surface parking lot?

From Chapter 15: traffic noise locations

Chapter 15, Noise, of the FEIS, was not comprehensive, as it addressed noise from traffic, not pedestrians, an issue bypassed in the answer above. It states:
The noise analysis presented in this chapter focuses on the noise-generated changes in traffic that would result from the operation of the proposed project (i.e., when construction of Phase I and Phase II have been completed in the years 2010 and 2016, respectively). Noise effects during construction of the proposed project are analyzed and discussed in Chapter 17, “Construction Impacts.”
Where'd the impact be? The chapter states:
Specifically, excluding the effects of construction, in 2010, when construction of Phase I of the proposed project would be completed, noise levels due to project-generated traffic would exceed the 2001 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual impact criteria and result in significant adverse noise impacts during one or more time periods on Flatbush Avenue in the area near Dean Street, on Dean Street from approximately Flatbush to Vanderbilt Avenues (including the Dean Playground), 6th and Carlton Avenues from approximately Dean Street to Atlantic Avenue. These locations are the principal feeder streets to and from the parking facilities for Phase I project elements. The impacts would be localized and occur on street segments immediately adjacent to the project site (Flatbush Avenue, Dean Street, and 6th and Carlton Avenues). On Dean Street, existing and No Build noise levels are relatively low and project-generated traffic would cause significant increases in noise levels on this street, but would still result in noise levels that fall in the CEQR “marginally unacceptable” range, which is not unusual for New York City residential areas.

In 2016, when construction of the proposed project would be complete, noise levels due to project-generated traffic would exceed the CEQR Technical Manual impact criteria and result in significant adverse noise impacts during one or more time periods at the same locations as in 2010—on Flatbush Avenue near Dean Street, on Dean Street from approximately Flatbush to Vanderbilt Avenues (including the Dean Playground), and on 6th and Carlton Avenues from approximately Dean Street to Atlantic Avenue.
(Emphases added)

The-not-so-quiet plaza?

The chapter also states:
In addition, noise levels within the new open space areas created on-site as part of the proposed project would be above the 55 dBA L10(1) noise level for outdoor areas requiring serenity and quiet contained in the CEQR Technical Manual noise exposure guidelines.
At the time of the FEIS, all such "new open space areas" would be created in Phase 2, around residential towers east of Sixth Avenue.

The arena, west of Sixth Avenue, was to be bordered by an an unclosed Urban Room, part of the structure connecting to Building 1, the first tower.

Now, of course, that space is to be an open plaza. The impact of noise on that plaza was not studied. However, given its central location, bordered by Atlantic and Flatbush avenues, it's hard to imagine that noise levels would not "be above the 55 dBA L10(1) noise level for outdoor areas requiring serenity and quiet."

070811 Response to Questions re Traffic from June 14 Public Meeting

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…