Skip to main content

The mysteries of after-hours work at the arena site: do people live nearby? (yes, but most permits say "no") and what's the rationale? (not made public)

Since February, contractors at the Atlantic Yards arena block have 36 times gained after-hours variance (AHV) permits for work at the Atlantic Yards arena block, according to documents available via the Department of Buildings (DOB) web site.

Nine of those instances regarded weekday work that began early or went to a second shift, and 27 regarded weekend work. No 24-hour variance has been granted yet, though the July 18 Construction Update, prepared by developer Forest City Ratner and issued by the Empire State Development Corporation, suggested one might be sought.

Lingering questions

According to the online versions of those permits--the site is known as 620 Atlantic Avenue or 2-6 Fifth Avenue--two things stood out:
  • Arena builder Hunt Construction, more than three-quarters of the time, apparently stated that there were no residences within 200 feet of the site. (Yes, there are--see photo below by Tracy Collins, looking west from the corner of Dean Street and Sixth Avenue. As discussed below, Hunt asserts that the permits it files always acknowledge there are residences within 200 feet. Without seeing the original documents, that statement will remain a question mark.)
  • No rationale for the after-hours work was publicly provided. Yes, applications to the DOB must contain such a rationale, but apparently the DOB does not make that information public.
I tried to learn more, but didn't get too far.


What they must tell DOB

The application instructions (below) require, among other things:
  • Indicate if there is a residence within 200 feet of the site by checking the appropriate box.
  • Provide the date(s), hours of the day, and a brief description of the work to be done after hours broken down by weekday and weekend.
  • Indicate the reason for variance by providing a brief explanation as to why the work is necessary for the specified weekday and/or weekend date(s).
What's the reason? Lost at the DOB

The reason for the variance is part of the application form, but not part of the permit made public.

(I'm sure it's something like: We want to get our work done faster, even though we're ahead of schedule, in case we face bad weather, strikes or other unforeseen delays. In other words, maximum productivity.)

On Tuesday, I tried to find that out. I tried first as a regular citizen. I called the Brooklyn Borough Office Customer Service number. The voicemail box was full, and I was then automatically transferred to a nonworking number.

I called the DOB's Interactive Voice System and eventually spoke to a person who, after being shown the reference number for the site, understood my query and told me to call the Brooklyn Borough Manager.

I did so; he was out, but the woman answering the phone told me the information was at the Commissioner's Office.

How could I get that?

Are you the owner or contractor, I was asked.

I said no.

Then you have no access to the reason, I was told. Then she hung up on me.

I called the press office. The phone rang and rang, then was shunted off into a busy signal. I then sent an email to a DOB press person and to the DOB's Twitter account. No response.

Looking at the variances

The most recent variance, issued 8/4/11, regards weekday work 5 am to 11 pm this week:
Description of Work: (Atlantic Yards) Excavate and backfill foundations, formwork and rebar installation at foundations, spray fireproofing, ductwork installation, plumbing rough-in, electrical rough-in, steel erection and detailing. Deliveries (from 5am - 7pm ONLY)
The posted certificate is below.
After Hours Work Variance Permit, for Barclays Center, 8/8/11 - 8/12/11

Residence within 200 feet?

Note that according to this permit, Hunt Construction indicated that a residence is within 200 feet of the site.

A nearly similar request for such a permit, with the checkoff indicating that a residence was not within 200 feet, was revoked 8/2/11. (I suspect it wasn't the 200-foot issue, but more likely that the description of work in the earlier request did not include "steel erection and detailing.")

The previous week's request, dated 7/29/11, for weekday work 5 am to 11 pm, described similar work at the site, but indicated no residence is within 200 feet of the site.


Querying Hunt/FCR

I contacted Hunt Construction two days ago to learn more about this--did they make a mistake? do they classify "site" differently each week?--and got a response yesterday via Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco.

"[T]he contractor has gone back and reviewed and they have consistently noted that all work on the project and all permits filed for the same occur within 200 feet of residences," he wrote.

I sent back several screenshots, like the one above, indicating that the DOB, at least online, reports information to the contrary.

DePlasco said he'd check again--so if I get any more information I'll update it. (Could Hunt be wrong? Could the DOB have mis-applied the information when it went online?)

The DOB expects candor. According to the application (below), those filling it out state:
I understand that if I am found after hearing to have knowingly or negligently made a false statement or to have knowingly or negligently falsified or allowed to be falsified any certificate, form, signed statement, application, report or certification of the correction of a violation required under the provisions of this code or of a rule of any agency, I may be barred from filing further applications or documents with the Department.
Previous variances

Listed below are links to previous variances, with the words NO and YES appended to indicate the applicant's response to whether a residence is within 200 feet of the site.

8/2/11: for weekend work 5 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

7/29/11: for weekend work 5 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday YES (An earlier request, dated 7/26/11, was revoked, likely because the Saturday work was to start at 7 am. The check-off said. NO.)

7/19/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

7/19/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

7/12/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

7/12/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

7/6/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

7/6/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

6/29/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

6/29/11: for four days of weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

6/21/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm YES

6/21/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday and Sunday YES

6/14/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

6/14/11: for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

6/7/11:  for weekday work 6 am to 11 pm NO

6/7/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

5/31/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday NO

5/17/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday, 7 am to 3 pm Sunday YES

5/10/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday and Sunday NO

5/2/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday and Sunday NO

4/29/11: for weekend work 7 am to 5 pm Saturday and Sunday NO
(That had previously been revoked 4/27/11, with a NO check-off.)

4/19/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm YES

4/15/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO
(A previous request for work from 10 am to 4 pm, dated 4/12/11, was revoked, with a NO check-off.)

4/8/11: for weekend work Saturday 10 am to 4 pm NO

4/5/11: for weekend work Saturday 10 am to 4 pm NO

3/31/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

3/22/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

3/15/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

3/8/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm YES

3/3/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO
(This updated a 3/1/1 permit.)

2/22/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm YES

2/16/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

2/11/11: for weekend work Saturday 7 am to 5 pm NO

Below, I've annotated the full list. Note that the Y refers to the individual job on the closest horizontal line, except for the two jobs with the decision date 6/21/11.


The cost

Applicants must pay an initial filing fee ($100 for 1-3 days of work, $200 for 4-6 days of work, etc.), as well as a daily fee of $80 for each day of after hours work.

After Hours Work Permit Application


After Hours Work Permit Application Instructions, NYC DOB

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

So, Forest City has some property subject to the future Gowanus rezoning

Writing yesterday, MAP: Who Owns All the Property Along the Gowanus Canal, DNAinfo's Leslie Albrecht lays out the positioning of various real estate players along the Gowanus Canal, a Superfund site:
As the city considers whether to rezone Gowanus and, perhaps, morph the gritty low-rise industrial area into a hot new neighborhood of residential towers (albeit at a fraction of the height of Manhattan's supertall buildings), DNAinfo reviewed property records along the canal to find out who stands to benefit most from the changes.
Investors have poured at least $440 million into buying land on the polluted waterway and more than a third of the properties have changed hands in the past decade, according to an examination of records for the nearly 130 properties along the 1.8-mile canal. While the single largest landowner is developer Property Markets Group, other landowners include Kushner Companies, Alloy Development, Two Trees, and Forest City New York.

Forest City's plans unc…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…