Skip to main content

More from AY cabinet meeting: few workers on site, reversible lane snag, demand management upgrade, sidewalk dispute with LIRR, wariness re public

Updated 5:46 pm with map and explanation on why this meeting was not subject to the open meetings law.

The lead news from the second meeting of the Atlantic Yards District Service Cabinet,held yesterday at Brooklyn Borough Hall, concerned the delayed (but architect-assigned) Building 2 and the re-launch of Forest City Ratner’s Atlantic Yards web site.

But there were several other pieces of news, including a rather low number of local workers. FCR said there are about 150 workers at the site now, with 58 local residents placed though a Community Labor Exchange since the start of construction, with 19 now on the site. (Here's more on the lag between numbers and projections.)

A Community Board District Manager expressed dismay over the weather-related demise of a reversible lane along Flatbush Avenue.

Forest City Ratner said it would beef up a previously announced demand management plan to reduce driving to the arena, and then share it for public comment.

The Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) reported on an unresolved dispute involving the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) and the city Department of Transportation (DOT) regarding clearing/cleaning of the railyard perimeter.

There also was an unsettled/unsettling vibe regarding transparency, given a relatively low level of participation by cabinet members as well as a wariness toward the public and press, as described below. (The meeting wasn’t announced, and videotaping was banned.)

The meeting was attended by representatives of various agencies, Community Boards, and elected officials involved in the project. The only elected official to attend was Council Member Letitia James. FCR executive MaryAnne Gilmartin, unlike at the first meeting in November, did not attend.

Milestones murky

Early in the meeting, James asked about project milestones, a question that might provide some insight on the overall timetable.

ESDC Project Manager Arana Hankin deflected the question somewhat, pointing to Forest City Ratner’s plan to provide a more focused update on current construction.

Construction update: excavation contradictions

Forest City Ratner’s Linda Chiarelli said that excavation is now 75% complete and and should be completed in early March. Foundation work should be done in June.

By contrast, last September, Bruce Ratner said excavation was 70% complete. In October, he said it was "75-to-80% complete."

Steel is 20-25 percent erected, “you can see the bowl start to form,” Chiarelli said, pointing to a slide. “We'll start to see facade panels come in July, along Atlantic Avenue.”

Work is ongoing regarding the Carlton Avenue Bridge, with demolition basically done on the north abutments, and pile-drilling for support of excavation to begin in a few weeks. Work on Transit Authority vents should be starting in March.

In the next 30 to 60 days, FCR plans to start demolishing remaining buildings on Block 1129, the southeast block.

MWBE contracting

Forest City Ratner’s Sonya Covington sketched figures regarding MWBE (minority and women’s business enterprises) contracting. Some 98% of the $16.6 million infrastructure has been done by minority and women owned firms.

Mostly women or minority, asked James.

“It's been mostly minority,” Covington said. “The majority of the firms throughout the project site that have gotten work... are Brooklyn-based firms, as well.”

She said about $305.5 million for arena work has been contracted through Hunt Construction, about $36.5 million, or 12%, to MWBE firms.

Regarding transit work, she said, of $51 million, there’s been $8.2 million to MWBEs, of 16%. For demoliton, $14.1 million has been awarded to date, with 50%, or $7 million, to MWBEs.

Railyard work, including the Carlton Avenue Bridge, is $46.8 million, of which $18 million, or 38.5%, has gone to MWBEs.

No documents were released, however, and no Independent Compliance Monitor has been hired, so all those numbers could use further clarification.

Demand management upgrade

Marshall said that FCR has hired Sam Schwartz Engineering, its longtime consultant, to augment and refine the previously announced demand management plan, involving incentives to use transit and shuttle buses rather than drive to arena events.

“The demand management plan cannot just address the Nets,” Marshall said, referencing a criticism that had been raised during the environmental review. “So we're not going to look at what the FEIS [Final Environmental Impact Statement] requires"--see p. 11 of this document--"we're going to create what we hope is a really good, solid plan.”

“How far out are you looking?” asked James.

Marshall noted that “the FEIS goes all the way to Staten Island,” though she expressed skepticism that people would park in Staten Island and get on a bus to ride 45 minutes to the arena.

“We want to come up with a structure with substance in it and present it to the Community Boards for comments and input,” Marshall said. “I don't think that's going to be for another six months.”

James asked if they were taking residential parking permits into consideration.

Marshall said FCR was “perfectly happy with” such permits, but doesn’t play a role.

Later Marshall explained that it didn’t make sense to just describe the measures in the FEIS. Rather, she said, “We're going to come up with a plan,” discuss it with agencies and stakeholders, and then present it at meetings.

“That makes sense,” agreed James.

ESDC role

ESDC planner Rachel Shatz explained that a memorandum of environmental commitments describes mitigation measures at the site. One firm, HDR, acts as a mitigation monitor regarding issues like traffic and air quality, and the owners’ representatives, STV, also plays a role.

Have there been any issues, asked Craig Hammerman, District Manager of Community Board 6.

Shatz described a few issues regarding equipment without appropriate filters, which were taken out of use or piled soil that was not properly covered.

No reversible lane

The Department of Transportation’s Chris Hrones said that, after the late December storm, the flexible bollards used to create a reversible lane along Flatbush Avenue just south of Atlantic Avenue have been damaged.

He said DOT was working with Forest City Ratner to get new such delineators in place, but have been delayed by continued storms. He said they should be back in place by next week.

“I can't stress how critical that capacity is, and how detrimental it has been to lose it,” Hammerman said. He asked whether the problem could return.

Hrones said such problems recur after storms. As for alternatives, it would be inappropriate to put in a costly overhead sign for such a temporary diversion, given that such signs are devoted to permanent lane changes.

Bus shelters?

James said she’d received a lot of complaints, particularly from seniors, about the removal of bus shelters on Atlantic Avenue.

Hrones said he’d be happy to explore, with Forest City Ratner, a temporary solution. Meeting chair Carlo Scissura, chief of staff to Borough President Marty Markowitz, said Markowitz also would weigh in.

Sanitation/snow removal snag

Hankin projected a map of the project site that delineates the responsibility by various entities for cleaning and clearing the sidewalks.

(Click to enlarge)

At the western end of the site, a contractor working on transit is responsible, while Hunt Construction is responsible for the arena block.

Forest City Ratner, which has a lease arrangement with the ESDC, has taken responsibility for most of the site.

The problem comes with property along Atlantic Avenue and Pacific Street east of Sixth Avenue that is owned by the Long Island Rail Road.

“There's much confusion about who's responsible,” James said, referring to the confusing map, “because as of today, some streets are plowed, some are shoveled.”

Hankin said she’d talked to the LIRR’s senior counsel, who said the agency is not subject to local ordinances. (I reported on this dispute January 14.)

James suggested that the issue should “go up the food chain to the governor of the state of New York, who has jurisdiction over all agencies... The only thing that has helped you is the sun.”

“This is an ongoing debate between DOT and LIRR,” Hankin said, referring to issues well beyond Atlantic Yards.

(And, I'd point out, this answers the question, never quite answered in the ESDC's response to comments in 2006, as to who's responsible for the "blight" at MTA property.)

More meetings needed

Community Board 2 District Manager Robert Perris suggested that cabinet meetings, rather than quarterly, should be every other month.

He also proposed that presenters share their notes/reports in advance, which would shorten meetings. He also pointed out that “people had a number of question we haven't really gotten to, in part because those questions were finalized so close to today’s meeting.”

Scissura responded that “this meeting is not all that we do,” adding that “questions are going back and forth with everyone involved on an almost daily basis... The purpose of this meeting is really to get an update from Forest City, to get an update from the affected agencies, and to bring up general things. We just feed questions all the time.”

“I think that's exactly right,” Hankin said.

Hammerman asked if anyone objected to the schedule.

“I have no objections,” Hankin said, but stressed she wanted the process to be as productive as possible. “Frankly ESDC and FCR do not receive an overabundance of issues/complaints regarding the site,” she said. “I don't want us to meet just to meet.”

Hammerman responded, “Frankly, I didn't get the impression that this entity was supposed to be a demand-driven entity... I think it's a good investment of all of our time.”

Scissura said that, while the next meeting had been tentatively scheduled for May 5, “why don't we shoot for mid-April?”

James said she agreed with bimonthly meetings. “Things are beginning to pick up,” she said. “A day does not go by where I do not field questions regarding Atlantic Yards.”

That suggests that people are contacting her office far more than the ESDC.

Not a public meeting

At the outset, Scissura announced that it was not a public meeting, and that videotaping would not be permitted.

That statement was clearly aimed at me--the only other press person was Rich Calder of the Post, who wrote an overview-- and a minute later, when Scissura was no longer speaking to the group, I approached him. He told me that if I shot video (as I did in November) they’d have me removed.

Later in the meeting, ESDC project manager Hankin, with a bit of edge in her voice, stated that meetings of the Atlantic Yards District Service Cabinet are not subject to the open meetings law.

She said that had been confirmed with the legal counsel of the ESDC and the Borough President’s Office. “Therefore we are not required to post the date of the meetings or invite the public; as a courtesy we've agreed to allow the public to attend,” she said.

Hankin noted that there are multiple avenues for the public to ask questions, via Forest City Ratner and the ESDC. “This body is really serving as an interagency working group.”

After the meeting, I asked Hankin and Scissura by email for documentation that explained why the meeting was not subject to the open meetings law, as well as the rationale for banning videotaping.

The ESDC sent an answer this afternoon:
The Open Meetings Law applies to “public bodies” (Public Officers Law, Section 102(1)). A “public body” is defined as any entity for which 1) a quorum is required and (not “or”) 2) which consists of two or more members performing a governmental function for a “public corporation” (which under General Construction Law Section 66 includes a public benefit corporation, e.g., UDC) (Public Officers Law, Section 102(2)).

The Atlantic Yards District Cabinet does not require a quorum to meet. Given that the quorum requirement is one of two requirements for being a “public body”, the group would not appear to meet the definition of a public body. Consequently, the requirements of the Open Meetings Law are not triggered.

As for the second requirement that the entity consist of two or more members performing a governmental function for a public corporation, it may be argued that this requirement is met. However, such argument seems moot given the failure of the group, as described, to meet the first requirement of section 102(2).

Lastly, ESD did not restrict your ability to videotape the session.
Need for transparency

I can see the argument for non-public meetings, which can be used to air frank concerns and criticisms. Indeed, given the mild tensions expressed by some representatives of community boards, perhaps there would be a stronger back-and-forth in private.

On the other hand, there's an argument for public meetings. Atlantic Yards remains a giant project, and Forest City Ratner has gotten large amounts of direct and indirect government aid.

So the various promises and plans should be subject to scrutiny and evaluation, especially since no governance entity--as with other major ESDC projects--has been established.

At one point during the meeting yesterday, Prospect Heights activist Peter Krashes moved to sit next to James aide Alfred Chiodo at the conference table--otherwise limited to cabinet members--and spoke to him. That led Scissura to say a bit sourly, “Alfred, I see you've been fed some questions.”

There were only a couple of members of the public present, but it still seemed that scrutiny and questions were considered intrusive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …