Skip to main content

The iffy requirements for Block 1129 affordable housing and even iffier gap regarding construction over the railyard

At a press conference Tuesday, BrooklynSpeaks reminded us of requirements, first reported by AYR, that Forest City Ratner has to build only 300 units of affordable housing on the arena block within 12 years.

But the developer is supposed to build more, in the part of the project--Phase 2--beyond the arena block.

As it turns out, the Development Agreement, as excerpted below, requires 500 additional affordable housing units, to be built on Block 1129, the southeast block destined for interim surface parking.

How long do they have? 25 years.

What about the railyard?

What's curious is that, while the agreement ostensibly requires that all 2250 affordable housing units be built, it does not require specific targets for other portions of the site, such as the central and eastern blocks of the Vanderbilt Yard.

Big loopholes

The agreement also requires construction of the first residential building--though not necessarily one with affordable housing--on Block 1129 to begin within a decade after the Effective Date, when the Empire State Development Corporation delivers vacant possession of the Phase 1 Properties to the developer.

Except there's a huge loophole: "Market Financing Unavailability."

As the affordable housing comes with its own loopholes, such as the lack of subsidies.What's in Phase 2

According to section 8.7, concerning Phase 2 Construction, the developer is supposed to build a minimum of 2.97 million square feet of improvements within 25 years, "subject to Unavoidable Delays." (That would mean a project of less than 5.2 million square feet, a far cry from the 8 million square feet approved.)

Those delays include an "Affordable Housing Subsidy Unavailability" and delays caused by the requirement that not more than 50% of the residential units be completed without the completion of 50% of the Project Site Affordable Housing Units--meaning 1125 subsidized units. That strikes me as an extension of the "Affordable Housing Subsidy Unavailability."

Block 1129 construction

The southeast block is key because it is the only full block in Phase 2 that doesn't require decking over the railyards.

(Also not requiring a deck is a small piece of Block 1128, bounded by Dean and Pacific streets and extending 100 feet east from Sixth Avenue.)

As the document states:
8.7(c) Subject to Section 8.8 below, Interim Developer shall Commence Construction (or cause the Commencement of Construction) on Block 1129 of at least one residential building constituting a portion of the Phase II Improvements within ten (10) years of the Project Effective Date, subject to Unavoidable Delays. Once commenced, Interim Developer shall, or shall cause the applicable Tenant to, diligently prosecute construction of such building until Substantial Completion. For purposes of this Section 8.7(c) only, the term "Unavoidable Delays" shall include Market Financing Unavailability.
(Emphases added)

A Market Financing Unavailability is exactly what it sounds like: inability to obtain debt financing "on then market customary terms and conditions."

Affordable housing on Block 1129

The document also contains some complicated language regarding affordable housing in Phase 2. It states:
8.8(f) Until the date that each of the following are satisfied: (i) AYDC or its Affiliates shall have delivered to the MTA, LIRR or their respective designees the completion guaranty required by the Yard Relocation and Construction Agreement, (ii) such completion guaranty is effective and unconditional, and (iii) no Event of Default (as defined in the Yard Relocation and Construction Agreement) shall have occurred and be continuing, Interim Developer agrees that (i) at least eight hundred (800) Affordable Housing Units shall be Substantially Completed on Block 1129 prior to the Outside Phase II Substantial Completion Date; provided that such number shall be reduced by a unit for unit basis for each Phase I Affordable Housing Unit completed on the Arena Block, and (ii) for purposes of determining compliance with Section 8.8(a)(iii) above, not more than fifty percent (50%) of the number of residential units to be constructed on Block 1129 shall be completed without the completion of fifty percent (50%) of the Project Site Affordable Housing Units to be constructed on Block 1129 (it being agreed that for purposes of calculating the number of Project Site Affordable Housing Units to be constructed on Block 1129 only, such amount shall not exceed five hundred (500)).
(Emphases added)

Doing the math

Let me see if I can get this straight.

They're agreeing to build 800 affordable housing units.

Except they can reduce the number if they build affordable housing units--as required--in Phase 1.

Remember, they have to build at least 300 affordable housing units in Phase 1. So they only have to build 500 affordable housing units on Block 1129.

And that requirement is repeated in the last lines of the section: the number of Project Site Affordable Housing Units to be constructed on Block 1129 shall not exceed 500.

OK, they have to build 500 affordable housing units on Block 1129.

So why not say so in the first place, instead of using the number 800? Am I missing something?

Looking at the nomenclature

There's apparently a distinction between Affordable Housing Units and Project Site Affordable Housing Units

Affordable Housing Units, according to Appendix A attached to Section 17, are residential rental units subject to restricts set by city and state affordable housing programs, with rents no more than 30% of 160% of Area Median Income (or, if higher, 30% of the highest percentage of AMI used at the applicable time).

Project Site Affordable Housing Units concerns no fewer than 2250 Affordable Housing Units constructed on the project site.

We'll see.
Atlantic Yards Development Agreement Section 8
Atlantic Yards Development Agreement 17.2


Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …