Skip to main content

The crucial (temporary) Barclays Center plaza and the missing B1; what happens if/when tower arrives (6th Ave. alternate entrance)?

I'm leading a walking tour Sunday of Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park/Barclays Center/Prospect Heights (via Municipal Art Society), and present several posts in preparation. One thing to remember: the project remains very much in process. Some impacts feared, expected, or welcomed have not emerged because they were calculated on a larger/full buildout.

Perhaps the most glaring architectural difference between Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park as planned and as it has emerged is the absence of "Miss Brooklyn," aka B1, the flagship office tower.

Some 511 feet tall and containing 1.1 million square feet, intended to loom over the intersection of Atlantic and Flatbush avenues.

(See list of building heights and square footages; note that B1 was reduced from 620 feet to 511 feet to be shorter than the Williamsburgh Savings Bank, though the point is somewhat moot today, with taller buildings in Downtown Brooklyn.)

Miss Brooklyn/B1 would be huge. Consider how even when the rendering above right, by original architect Frank Gehry, managed to minimize the bulk of the building, it still looks big. That's the arena buried behind it, remember.

What happens if/when it arrives?

So if and when B1 arrives, it will dramatically change our perceptions of the project. What architect/planner/SHoP partner Vishaan Chakrabarti calls the "high-low city"--the interplay of bulk and space--would become the "high-high city."

The construction also may awkwardly shut down the arena entrance, in part or in full, and shift some foot traffic to little-trafficked zones on the north and east flanks. I describe that further below.

All this should remind us, as I wrote in December 2012, the plaza view was never planned. But now people are attached to the plaza.

It's crucial to the functioning of the arena, allowing crowds to gather, and providing a transition for those approaching along Atlantic and Flatbush avenues from denser Brooklyn.

It's certainly reasonable for Chakrabarti to point out the advantage of such contrast, but it's also ahistorical, since the office tower was a crucial contributor to the projected new tax revenues. In other words, had Atlantic Yards been presented without that tower, the numbers would not have worked.

A changing plan

Originally, the plan was to bury the arena in four towers. Then, when developer Bruce Ratner ditched the Gehry design for a smaller arena, the four towers around it were detached, and would be built on a different timetable.

Since then, the renderings of the arena block by SHoP have depicted three residential towers, but not B1.

Note how the rendering at right, from helicopter perspective, doesn't exactly capture the street-level view of these quite large buildings.

Could the promised Urban Room, an atrium within Miss Brooklyn for people to gather, and encompassing the subway entrance, work for arena visitors?

Perhaps, though not as permeably as the plaza. (I imagine it also would be policed/patrolled differently to drive away some people gathering in a climate-controlled space.)

Look below and see how a tower would change our perspective on the plaza.

Is B1 coming?

In early February, Forest City Ratner CEO MaryAnne Gilmartin was asked about plans for B1.

"I think we're still in planning stages of B1," Gilmartin stated. "The issue is the obvious one: landing the building at the prow of the arena, given that the open space has become a public amenity. We are noodling over that. We are entitled to build a building… with our partner Greenland. We are working through that. When we know what we're doing, we'll come and talk to you."

(In this case, "you" meant the Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation, set up to channel public input regarding the project.)

She did not specify that it would be an office tower as long planned. It might be a residential tower.

I wonder whether Greenland Forest City Partners might use the public acceptance and appreciation of the plaza to leverage a swap: let us keep the plaza, as long as we get commensurate valuable development rights somewhere else. That would be a double gift from the public.

Then again, Forest City may not be operating an arena for long. A new owner of the arena operating company should arrive, as Forest City has put its 55% share up for sale, and Nets majority owner Mikhail Prokhorov may sell his share. That arena operator likely would want to keep the plaza, and urge Greenland Forest City not to build B1.

What happens to arena as B1 gets built?

In the 2006 Memorandum of Environmental Commitments for Atlantic Yards, signed by Forest City in 2006 along with project approvals, there was no mention of an alternate entrance, because at that point B1 was supposed to be built and contain the Urban Room.

That changed. Information on a temporary new main entrance was in the 12/21/09 Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments (below), posted by the Empire State Development Corporation and laying out Forest City Ratner's obligations (p. 22):
In the event development of Building 1 is delayed so that it will be constructed after the arena commences operation, FCRC shall, for the period of construction of Building 1: (i) relocate the main arena entrances to the north and east side of the arena...
(Emphasis added; I first wrote about this 2/26/11)

The north side of the building is Atlantic Avenue, where there are several doors--some little or unused for entry--and a narrow sidewalk. There's little room for crowds.

There's relatively more space at the east side of the arena, at Sixth Avenue and Pacific Street, pictured above. Currently signage says the Sugar Factory is coming, but it's already operating, at least for arenagoers during events. Presumably if those doors are used as an arena entrance, the store will have to adjust or relocate.

I can't imagine that these two locations--at the north and east ends of the arena--could fully compensate for the loss of the plaza entry. So, I'd predict, the already established secondary entrance on Dean Street east of Flatbush Avenue would bear more of the brunt.

And because that will be between two residential buildings that should open by early 2017, Greenland Forest City would have an interest in not annoying its tenants. (Forest City is building B2, at Flatbush and Dean, while the partnership is building B3, at Sixth and Dean.) But I doubt it can be worked out painlessly.

(The plan also appears on p. 29 of the Second Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments, signed 6/10/14.)


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…