Skip to main content

Community Board 6 committee disapproves Kemistry Lounge liquor license application; would be second bottle-service club in the borough (video)

After hearing passionate criticism about the planned Kemistry Lounge on Flatbush Avenue near Prospect Place, the Community Board 6 Public Safety/Environmental Protection/Permits/Licenses committee voted to disapprove a liquor license application, agreeing with concerns expressed about late night hours and what would be only the second bottle-service club in the borough--and the first one particularly close to residences.

Here's a summary of concerns from Prospect Place Neighbors, a new organization formed in response to the application, which points out that the location is within 500 feet of eight establishments with full liquor licenses and on a block with six storefronts of preschool facilities. (Here's their press kit.)

The lounge would be a few short blocks from the Barclays Center, clearly a generator of patrons.

The committee's vote is only advisory, and the State Liquor Authority (SLA) has the final call.. As noted on Park Slope Patch:
“I am surprised. We want to speak with the board again to make a better business plan and work it out,” [Kemistry's James] Brown said, explaining that he is not sure if they are going to bring their application to the SLA right away or not. “I was definitely disappointed, but we will continue to work at it until we can come up with something that is amicable to both sides.”
Kemistry applicants pointed out that another establishment down the block, originally called Prime 6 and now Woodlands (expected to open shortly) got 4 am closing hours approved--and in this case they want a 3:30 am cutoff on weekends, while residents, as well as the North Flatbush Business Improvement District (NF BID), asked for 2 am.

Community members accused the applicants of bad faith, for example responding to the CB 6 questionnaire (in press kit) by indicating Kemistry would be closed on Sundays, but now planning to be open. They were vocally pleased at the committee's decision.

Drawing a line

The issue highlights the tensions between the push for retail and entertainment on busy Flatbush Avenue, a major thoroughfare, and quiet adjacent streets.

But Community Board members decided to draw a line, in part because of the addition of bottle service and concerns raised about that, as well as the size of an establishment serving 225 people.

“How do you consume a bottle of vodka in 30 minutes?” commented resident Christine Guerra. “We’re concerned that people, having consumed large quantities of alcohol, being put out in the street 30 minutes after last call. That’s the bottom line.”

Board member Lou Sones commented on the attempt at negotiation, brokered by the NF BID, which was only partly successful: “There’s all these stipulations that are trying to make this not a nightclub.”

“It’s not a nightclub,” one of the applicants replied, to skeptical chuckles from the audience.

“It seems, the design of it, the music programming, the hours you guys want to do," Sones responded. "If it’s not a nightclub, are you willing to close at 11 o’clock at night?”

The answer was no.

“I think we’re arguing--do we want something that is like a nightclub in this space, which goes the whole length of the street [between Flatbush and Prospect Place],” Sones said. “They might not call it a nightclub, but it seems like a nightclub to me. People in this neighborhood, and we’re going to deal with this with Atlantic Yards. We have to segment these issues out. People really got screwed--they either got kicked out of the neighborhood because of Atlantic Yards, Or the people that stayed--they’re now getting inundated, with their quality of life.”

Negotiation efforts

Regina Cahill, president of the NF BID, recounted a three-hour meeting, involving neighbors, representatives of elected officials, and the applicants, where the stipulations were discussed. The disagreements included not only hours and bottle service, but the character of the back wall on Prospect Place--glass or and a catering license for parties.

Andy Ring, in the third video, noted that Kemistry initially presented itself as a jazz lounge. “You don’t pop into a bar or restaurant for a whole bottle of vodka.” He said there were no other clubs of that size in the area.

“We tried to work with them in good faith,” he said. “We don’t feel that was reciprocated.”

Sugarcane, a bar/restaurant down the block, closes at 2 am on weekends, one neighbor pointed out.

“We heard a lot of what you guys had to say,” Brown said at one point. “We’ve agreed to almost every stipulation.” The majority of the music would be on the Flatbush side: “There’s not going to be as much thump-thump-thump” on the residential block.

He said, as noted in the fourth video, that they were willing to adjust the hours of opening, as well as the time period for bottle service. “We’re looking for a middle ground. We’re not looking to stay open til 4 am like Prime 6.” But his intention to stay open until 2 am on weeknights was greeted with dismay.

Bottle service

“I have worked as a bartender... you actually monitor the amount people are served,” commented board member Sayar Lonial. “People who serve themselves do not monitor what they’re served. Bottle service has no business in a location... that is in any proximity to a residential neighborhood.”

During the discussion, Sones said, “we’re trying to fit a square peg in the wrong hole.” The arena will be generating late night business, and “we can't ask a proprietor to limit their hours.... We have to decide: should this place exist or not exist.”

Board member Matt Silverman noted that there were several bars already there. “It comes down to whether we want to live on bar row,” he said, acknowledging that the board might be seen as inconsistent because it’s approved previous licenses. “At some point, there has to become a point where there's too many bars.” While “Prime 6 came a long way... at this point, I don't see a place for that establishment at this location.”

One board member proposed approval based on stipulations, including bottle service ending two hours before last call and the closing time at 2 am on Fridays and Saturdays and midnight on other days. Brown said Kemistry couldn't meet the stipulations, so that motion was withdrawn.

Then a motion to reject the application was approved, with about a dozen yes votes and two abstentions.

On video, some of the discussion/comments









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.