Skip to main content

State government moves toward accountability... on highway construction cost overruns

An 11/16/11 press release from Gov. Andrew Cuomo indicates a new effort to protect taxpayer dollars from cost overruns on state highway construction projects.

It's not a direct parallel to Atlantic Yards, but it points to several principles that could apply to construction/development projects like Atlantic Yards, including inadequate planning, lack of oversight, and limited accountability.

The press release:
Governor Cuomo Announces New Reforms Designed to Keep State Highway Construction Projects on Budget and on Time

Changes Come After Independent Review of Problems Affecting Interstate 287

Albany, NY (November 16, 2011)

Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced new reforms designed to keep state highway construction projects on budget and on time.

These changes come after a series of recommendations from an independent review, ordered by the Governor, of delays and cost over-runs which have affected I-287 in Westchester for over a decade.

"I have repeatedly said that government must protect every taxpayer dollar by being efficient and effective," Governor Cuomo said. "For over a decade, the I-287 project has been mired in delays and cost over-runs, and that's why I ordered an independent review and that's why the Department of Transportation is making these important reforms."

The I-287 Cross Westchester Expressway Corridor project began 15 years ago. The original cost of the first five stages was expected to be $490 million, but ended up being $568 million, as overruns drove the price up by 16%.

In June, Governor Cuomo ordered an independent and comprehensive review of the I-287 project in response to the significant, unexpected costs and delays. Peter Lehrer, a renowned national construction expert, led the review. Lehrer's work includes the restorations of the Statue of Liberty, Ellis Island, Grand Central Terminal, and the American Museum of Natural History.

The review team conducted two months of interviews with NYS Department of Transportation (DOT) management staff, contractors and construction experts. The team also reviewed project metrics, project cost and schedule data, contracts, change orders and bid documents. They also conducted research on best practices within DOT and other states.

The key problems identified by the review include:

  • Inadequate planning before designing the project
  • The use of design teams that were not qualified for such a large project
  • Rigid regional funding formulas which forced the project to be broken into six phases, increasing duration, complexity and cost
  • Lack of oversight that failed to keep the project on schedule and on budget
  • Limited accountability
The review called for two categories of reforms: one for project management and one for agency-wide reform within the Department of Transportation.

Regarding project management, steps DOT has taken include:

  • Monthly meetings to review issues and coordinate communication, including with utility companies, to ensure projects stay on schedule.
  • The use of expert consultants to analyze the designs of a project before it begins.
  • The establishment of a Capital Program Delivery Committee (CPDC), comprised of DOT employees, that will closely scrutinize the complexity and size of each project to make sure the best designers and project managers are used.
  • The acceptance or rejection of change order requests within a two week period- a process that previously has taken as long as a year- to save time when unexpected issues arise on a project site.
Regarding agency-wide changes, steps DOT has taken include:

  • Monthly meetings to review projects and performance.
  • No large project should be approved until CPDC reviews and approves the budget and design.
  • A redesign of the funding process to better direct money to major projects.
  • DOT will look across all regions when staffing projects and do a better job at sharing resources. This will allow DOT regions to share staffers with specific expertise with other regions, reducing costs and ensuring the project is in the best hands possible.
  • The implementation of a revised performance review process to ensure all DOT initiatives and projects meet the highest standards.
DOT has consistently had overruns on its projects in the 7% to 11% range, resulting in $530 million in total overruns over the past five years. Best-in-class state DOTs have achieved cost overruns that are less than 5% of their capital program. In addition to overruns, nearly half of DOT projects are delayed, with average delays of over six months. During the last seven years, projects over $25 million have been an average of 306 days late. Best-in-class DOTs deliver 80% to 90% of their projects on-time.

With this new approach to project and agency operations and management, DOT has issued new program goals including 90% of projects delivered on-time and no more than 5% overruns for all projects. As a result of the revamped approach to state construction, the I-287 project will be substantially completed by December 2012 instead of August 2013.

Joan McDonald, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Transportation, said, "Since taking office, Governor Cuomo has made it a priority to make government work more efficiently for the taxpayer and today is another step in this direction. As a result of these recommendations, DOT is transforming the way we manage construction projects across the state, while also making important changes within the agency. As we strengthen New York's infrastructure and build new highways and roads across our state, we must continue to do all we can to make sure projects are managed efficiently and completed on time."

Peter Lehrer said, "While our state and country continues to find ways to fund much needed infrastructure projects, we cannot forget the importance of spending the limited dollars that we do have in an efficient manner. Although the work on I-287 has created a better highway for the residents of Westchester, our infrastructure dollars could have been spent more wisely. I am pleased that Governor Cuomo tasked me with undertaking a comprehensive review of this project, and I believe our findings and recommendations will help transform DOT into a stronger, more efficient organization that will save taxpayer dollars while building and strengthening New York's infrastructure."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.