Skip to main content

Cuomo's new regional economic development councils: potential source of new state subsidies for Atlantic Yards?

Where will Forest City Ratner look for additional subsidies to meet Atlantic Yards profit goals, to get that first tower built (after additional city subsidies were denied), to finish the Carlton Avenue Bridge (after Carl Kruger came up empty), finish a new railyard (if EB-5 immigrant investor funds aren't enough), and to do much more?

They have to be considering the New York City Regional Economic Development Council, one of ten regional economic development councils established this past summer, as noted in a 7/20/11 press release headlined Governor Cuomo Announces $1 Billion in Economic Development Funding Will be Available Through New Consolidated Application Process:
Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced historic changes to the state's economic development grant application process, continuing the Governor's efforts to redesign the way state government works in order to drive economic growth and create jobs.

Under the new process, the ten Regional Councils will be able to apply for state funding to support projects they determine to be part of their regional strategy using a new Consolidated Funding Application (CFA), making the projects eligible for grant money and tax credits from dozens of existing programs. The combined pool of funding accessible through the CFA totals up to $1 billion.

...The Governor released a guidebook that details a fundamental shift in the state's approach to economic development. The Regional Councils will change a top-down development model to a community-based approach that emphasizes regions' unique assets, harnesses local expertise, and empowers each region to set plans and priorities.
The New York council

The New York City Regional Economic Development Council is meeting at 8:30 am today at York College in Queens.

At 1 pm, it will hold a Consolidated Funding Application Workshop, instructing applicants one how "to access multiple funding sources from dozens of existing programs through one comprehensive application, making it quicker and easier to receive funding." Several such workshops are being held around the state this week.

The Council includes representatives from business, labor, and academia, including Steve Spinola, President, Real Estate Board of New York; Kathryn Wylde, President & CEO, Partnership for New York City; and Carl Hum, President & CEO, Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce. However able they are, I don't think they're known for an emphasis on grassroots development.

Or is it simply that anything not top-down qualifies as a "community-based approach"?

What projects are eligible?

From the FAQ:
What kind of projects might the Councils identify and prioritize?
The Regional Council program recognizes that no two regions are identical – and that no one knows their regions better than the people who live there. Strengths, assets and priorities vary from region to region, and the projects identified by each region will vary accordingly. Each Regional Council will conduct a community-based strategic planning process to identify regionally significant projects that are ready for investment and capable of stimulating economic growth and community development.
The Vision Statement for the New York Council states:
To retain its status as a global economic powerhouse and to maximize its contributions to New York State, New York City seeks to reinforce its historic strengths, generate improvements in the quality of life for its residents through the creation of good jobs, and better leverage its academic and corporate assets in the technology-driven growth sectors of the 21st-century economy. This will require significant public and private investment focused on:
• Modernization of aging infrastructure (transportation, energy, and the built environment, both commercial and residential) and recapture of lost assets such as the 578 miles of city waterfront and thousands of acres of contaminated brownfield sites.
• Reduction of barriers to business development and expanded support for entrepreneurs, both immigrant and native born, who are the major generators of new jobs and of innovation.
• Enhanced development of human capital to achieve a more diverse, highly qualified, fairly compensated and inclusive workforce.
Would Atlantic Yards fit?

I wouldn't say that Atlantic Yards has anything to do with support for entrepreneurs or human capital.

But I bet someone would make the argument that it represents modernization of infrastructure--even though the Metropolitan Transportation Authority never asked for a new railyard before Forest City Ratner proposed to move it. Nor did the city ask for a new Carlton Avenue Bridge before Forest City announced plans to demolish and rebuild it.

Reading between the lines, there's at least rhetorical support for projects in development. The  9/13/11 agenda and summary for the New York Council states:
VII. Identifying Catalytic, Transformative Projects
Steve Hindy reported for the first group. The group focused on identifying certain sectors and encouraging entrepreneurship in those areas, through a Brooklyn Navy Yard concept, much like an incubator. It can be difficult to find space, financing, and a welcoming environment to start a business in the city. There is a long list of businesses waiting to get into the Navy Yard, and that concept should be implemented in other boroughs. The group talked about incentives to green development in transportation and other areas and viewed brownfields as a prime location for Navy Yard-type development. The group suggested rebates for energy efficiency, tax credits for businesses hiring the long-term unemployed, and a focus on food, media, entertainment, and the tech sector through the incubator concept.

Sheena Wright reported for the second group, which concluded that the council has a lot of work to do and must order its steps. It must be clear about the criteria for funding sources (i.e., tax credits or capital). In addition to coming up with catalytic investments, the council should identify projects already in development and determine gaps that could be filled in those projects. The group identified specific industries—including food, waterfront, technology, transportation, health-care delivery systems, entertainment, and incentives around green zones—as well as projects, including Hunts Point, the Metro North expansion, the Gowanus Expressway development, and the Kingsbridge Armory. The group’s overarching theme was to create the maximum number of high-quality jobs in every project, and to ensure that there are workforce development opportunities and initiatives for the long-term unemployed.

Chancellor Goldstein underscored the importance of considering projects already in development, which may need a final push.
(Emphases added)

Those examples don't exactly indicate Atlantic Yards, but it's a project "already in development," so never say never.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…