Skip to main content

The iffy requirements for Block 1129 affordable housing and even iffier gap regarding construction over the railyard

At a press conference Tuesday, BrooklynSpeaks reminded us of requirements, first reported by AYR, that Forest City Ratner has to build only 300 units of affordable housing on the arena block within 12 years.

But the developer is supposed to build more, in the part of the project--Phase 2--beyond the arena block.

As it turns out, the Development Agreement, as excerpted below, requires 500 additional affordable housing units, to be built on Block 1129, the southeast block destined for interim surface parking.

How long do they have? 25 years.

What about the railyard?

What's curious is that, while the agreement ostensibly requires that all 2250 affordable housing units be built, it does not require specific targets for other portions of the site, such as the central and eastern blocks of the Vanderbilt Yard.

Big loopholes

The agreement also requires construction of the first residential building--though not necessarily one with affordable housing--on Block 1129 to begin within a decade after the Effective Date, when the Empire State Development Corporation delivers vacant possession of the Phase 1 Properties to the developer.

Except there's a huge loophole: "Market Financing Unavailability."

As the affordable housing comes with its own loopholes, such as the lack of subsidies.What's in Phase 2

According to section 8.7, concerning Phase 2 Construction, the developer is supposed to build a minimum of 2.97 million square feet of improvements within 25 years, "subject to Unavoidable Delays." (That would mean a project of less than 5.2 million square feet, a far cry from the 8 million square feet approved.)

Those delays include an "Affordable Housing Subsidy Unavailability" and delays caused by the requirement that not more than 50% of the residential units be completed without the completion of 50% of the Project Site Affordable Housing Units--meaning 1125 subsidized units. That strikes me as an extension of the "Affordable Housing Subsidy Unavailability."

Block 1129 construction

The southeast block is key because it is the only full block in Phase 2 that doesn't require decking over the railyards.

(Also not requiring a deck is a small piece of Block 1128, bounded by Dean and Pacific streets and extending 100 feet east from Sixth Avenue.)

As the document states:
8.7(c) Subject to Section 8.8 below, Interim Developer shall Commence Construction (or cause the Commencement of Construction) on Block 1129 of at least one residential building constituting a portion of the Phase II Improvements within ten (10) years of the Project Effective Date, subject to Unavoidable Delays. Once commenced, Interim Developer shall, or shall cause the applicable Tenant to, diligently prosecute construction of such building until Substantial Completion. For purposes of this Section 8.7(c) only, the term "Unavoidable Delays" shall include Market Financing Unavailability.
(Emphases added)

A Market Financing Unavailability is exactly what it sounds like: inability to obtain debt financing "on then market customary terms and conditions."

Affordable housing on Block 1129

The document also contains some complicated language regarding affordable housing in Phase 2. It states:
8.8(f) Until the date that each of the following are satisfied: (i) AYDC or its Affiliates shall have delivered to the MTA, LIRR or their respective designees the completion guaranty required by the Yard Relocation and Construction Agreement, (ii) such completion guaranty is effective and unconditional, and (iii) no Event of Default (as defined in the Yard Relocation and Construction Agreement) shall have occurred and be continuing, Interim Developer agrees that (i) at least eight hundred (800) Affordable Housing Units shall be Substantially Completed on Block 1129 prior to the Outside Phase II Substantial Completion Date; provided that such number shall be reduced by a unit for unit basis for each Phase I Affordable Housing Unit completed on the Arena Block, and (ii) for purposes of determining compliance with Section 8.8(a)(iii) above, not more than fifty percent (50%) of the number of residential units to be constructed on Block 1129 shall be completed without the completion of fifty percent (50%) of the Project Site Affordable Housing Units to be constructed on Block 1129 (it being agreed that for purposes of calculating the number of Project Site Affordable Housing Units to be constructed on Block 1129 only, such amount shall not exceed five hundred (500)).
(Emphases added)

Doing the math

Let me see if I can get this straight.

They're agreeing to build 800 affordable housing units.

Except they can reduce the number if they build affordable housing units--as required--in Phase 1.

Remember, they have to build at least 300 affordable housing units in Phase 1. So they only have to build 500 affordable housing units on Block 1129.

And that requirement is repeated in the last lines of the section: the number of Project Site Affordable Housing Units to be constructed on Block 1129 shall not exceed 500.

OK, they have to build 500 affordable housing units on Block 1129.

So why not say so in the first place, instead of using the number 800? Am I missing something?

Looking at the nomenclature

There's apparently a distinction between Affordable Housing Units and Project Site Affordable Housing Units

Affordable Housing Units, according to Appendix A attached to Section 17, are residential rental units subject to restricts set by city and state affordable housing programs, with rents no more than 30% of 160% of Area Median Income (or, if higher, 30% of the highest percentage of AMI used at the applicable time).

Project Site Affordable Housing Units concerns no fewer than 2250 Affordable Housing Units constructed on the project site.

We'll see.
Atlantic Yards Development Agreement Section 8
Atlantic Yards Development Agreement 17.2


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…