Skip to main content

Bruce Ratner's salute to Helena Williams and the MTA, Forest City Ratner's subordinate in a private-public partnership

Last week and this one I'll try to compensate slightly for the failure of any metro columnists to show up and glean insights from the rich spectacle of the Barclays Center groundbreaking March 11.

Of all the brutally weird moments in the groundbreaking--the Rev. Herbert Daughtry damning the project site as rat-infested; the Rev. Al Sharpton suggesting that Jay-Z's fractional ownership stake in the team might inspire minority youth; developer Bruce Ratner's shout-out to his-wife-Pam-the-hoops-fan; Gov. David Paterson's epic fantasies about job creation; Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz's creepy fawning over Beyoncé--one was the most brutal.

It was brief, very brief.

It came during Ratner's 17-minute Commencement Day speech, in which he thanked everybody from labor to lawyers, looping back and forth through the calendar from 2004 to 2010, and waving his hands for occasional emphasis.

Government work

"In this business, you've got to deal with government agencies and, y'know what, it's been an honor to do that. I've worked for government for seven years. I understand what it is to be on both sides," he said. "I have huge respect for the city, the state, for anybody in government. It's one of the great callings of life. I can honestly say, my first seven years out of law school, I worked for the city and I'll tell you, even with this, those were the best seven years of my life."

"And so I'd like to to mention one very outstanding person: Helena Williams of the Long Island Rail Road," Ratner continued. "She met with [Forest City Ratner executive] MaryAnne Gilmartin in 2009, major breakthroughs. The railroad got done. We got all the agreements done, and we're on our way. Thank you very much, Helena."



Williams, on the stage, smiled and took in the applause.

She didn't have to do so.

She could've called in sick and skipped sharing the stage with paid supporters and compromised politicians.

The MTA and the developer

For whom does Williams work, the public, the developer, or, most likely, a governor who agreed from the get-go to support this project?

(Photo of Williams, testifying at 5/29/09 state Senate oversight hearing, copyright Jonathan Barkey.)

Last spring, acting MTA head Williams, presumably under pressure from her board, agreed to a smaller replacement railyard worth $100 million less.

The MTA also agreed to only $20 million down for the railyard segment needed for the arena, rather than $100 million for it all, with the remaining $80 million option on the remaining parcels to be paid at a generous 6.5% interest rate. (Eliot Brown of the Observer called the renegotiation "not the agency's finest hour.")

In other words, Forest City Ratner saved $180 million in cash flow, and at least $100 million in total--plus the difference between the MTA's interest rate and a bank's interest rate.

Essentially, Williams and the MTA board turned the public agency into Ratner's bank, giving him financing when there was none to be had, as the Real Deal noted, classifying the deal as one of the best during the credit crunch.

Yes, a state Supreme Court judge agreed that the deal was kosher, but he left out the 6.5% interest rate, as well as other sweeteners.

In other words, Atlantic Yards and the Vanderbilt Yard deal sound less like a public-private partnership than a private-public one.

Because if anything was clear from the groundbreaking, it was this: Ratner drove this train. A lot of people helped, but Ratner was driving.

(Meanwhile, the MTA was offering unsigned advice to bus riders about a bus stop closed for the groundbreaking and protest. Photo copyright Jonathan Barkey.)

The screen of thank-you messages

Around the tent housing the event, video screens broadcast a scroll of thank-you messages, to government agencies, lawyers, architects, all part of the same enterprise.

As the video below shows, it makes sense to give prominent place to the Empire State Development Corporation, the quasi-public agency that did the heavy lifting, spending Ratner's pass-through money on the environmental review and on lawyers.

Then came the MTA.

Then came the Community Benefits Agreement partners, groups supported financially by Ratner and fundamentally in the developer's debt.



MTA vs. CBA

There was little digital distance between the compromised CBA partners and the compromised MTA.

Only one of them, however, is responsible for moving millions of New Yorkers around the city.

And only one of them relies on scarce public funds.

Looking back at the deal

Williams didn't have to be there. In fact, there were reports that maybe the MTA--and perhaps even Williams--wasn't playing ball with Ratner.

At the hearing last May 29, state Senator Carl Kruger criticized the MTA for "foot-dragging in developing a dialogue” that could advance the project and also cited the MTA's “apparent refusal to move forward on a project that is critical to New York City’s economic future.”

When the deal was revealed last June 22, MTA board member Doreen Frasca said, "This is just an observation, and I know staff has worked very long and hard on this, including into this weekend, but I note that it's one month shy of four years since the board accepted the Forest City Ratner proposal, and this committee and this board is being given less than 48 hours to understand the complexities and vote intelligently... I think that's pretty outrageous. Why do we have to vote on Wednesday?"

"Well, of course, you don't," MTA CFO Gary Dellaverson responded. "It's entirely at the board's discretion to accept or reject or send back to the negotiating table... I think that, in terms of why must it be now in the summer versus in the fall, I think it really relates to Forest City's desire to market their bonds as a tax-exempt issuance [by a December 31 deadline]."

Two days later, Assemblyman Jim Brennan, said, “I’m here to discuss your duty not to squander your assets and your duty to be a good neighbor.”

Frasca, saying she'd studied the deal intensely, signed on.

Remember, WNYC's Matthew Schuerman reported (audio below) that MTA board members supported the deal because 1) they didn't think a better deal was in the offing and 2) they were under pressure from the mayor and governor who appointed them.

Yes, Williams got the deal done. But can she share Bruce Ratner's level of pride?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.