
Forest City Ratner president Bruce Ratner has tried to explain the forbidding interior design, in a New York Times story (Rethinking Atlantic Center With the Customer in Mind; 5/26/04):
The isolation of stores and lack of gathering locations inside the building was intentional, said its developer, Bruce Ratner of Forest City Ratner, driven by the needs of skittish national retailers and the notion that urban malls had failed because they became magnets for loitering teenagers who frightened the shoppers away.
āItās a problem of malls in dense urban areas that kids hang out there, and itās not too positive for shopping,ā Mr. Ratner said. āLook, here youāre in an urban area, youāre next to projects, youāve got tough kids.ā
Those observations, along with the mall's blank exterior walls, have contributed to the conclusion, held by some in Brooklyn, that the mall represents blight.
The ESDC says: blighted

Atlantic Center, according to data on Property Shark, contains 767,748 square feet, at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 4.67. That's less than half the maximum allowed FAR of 10, which would allow another 877,126 square feet. That's a total of 1.645 million square feet.
That number may be slightly off, given that a Memorandum of Understanding signed last year indicates that FCR would develop up to 875,000 square feet of commercial space and up to 711,000 square feet of residential space at the Atlantic Center site (for a total of 1.586 million square feet).
Even with the smaller total of 1.586 million square feet, the current mall is built to less than half the allowable density, which constitutes blight under the definition cited above.
Plans for the mall

Do the developer's long-term leases with tenants contemplate the potential demolition of the mall? Commercial leases, notes the Villager, almost always contain demolition clauses. Still, if some tenants resisted, how would they be evicted? A determination of blight would be handy.
Comments
Post a Comment