data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87b1c/87b1c3b32834916a721b2d5544403e990d75c043" alt=""
Now, in one tiny (.12-acre) triangle within the wedge, it houses the Brooklyn Bearās Garden, a human-engineered patch of nature, growing peaches and tomatoes, flowers and herbs. Boston ivy climbs the 27-foot cinderblock wall of the adjacent Modellās store, even wrapping its way around the Pacific Street side.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9482/c94821eef01e6b782d3fdda7c7a52e9f6ddb8039" alt=""
The project would exclude the garden, but the garden hardly fits the plan. As the Empire State Development Corporation states, in bureaucratic but assertive language in the General Project Plan:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d95fa/d95fa5311aa6d2e5f7eb64c78869293cfa8b790f" alt=""
Both parcels are significantly underutilized. Site 5 contains two one-story retail buildings and a parking lot. Blank walls with no glazing and few breaks or entrances abut four public streets.
Site 5 history
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/472d7/472d7c17f7be3a27e81145a00769c31e662915e3" alt=""
In 1982, neighborhood activists, disgusted by the brownstone rubble in the lot, began clearing it, with BAMās consent, for a community garden, one thatās won citywide recognition. The name, Brooklyn Bearās, came from a teddy bear found among the debris. āThatās when this neighborhood was truly blighted,ā garden coordinator Jon Crow asserts.
Longtime Pacific Street resident Jim Vogel attributes the blockās improvement to several factors, including general economic growth, the purchase and renovation of buildings, and the slowing of prostitution after the closing of the Daily News plant and the advent of AIDS. āBut it's very accurate to say that without the garden, Pacific Street today wouldn't be nearly as charming and successful as it is,ā said Vogel, who is also secretary of the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods. It's a testament to what local folks can do when the big money planners stay out of the way.ā
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35f38/35f38667b1d3e7df8a58acbc55b04adbcfbe40ad" alt=""
(The photo, which shows traffic on Flatbush Avenue in front of the garden, was taken from Pacific Street in the proposed project footprint by Daniel Goldstein of Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn, a Bear's Garden member.)
Even before that, according to a chronology provided by Bearās coordinator Jon Crow, FCR plowed through the garden fence to conduct drilling test, a first warning of future development. It was winter, but several vegetable boxes were run over.
The city retained development rights beyond the elevations of the planned buildings. (When did Forest City Ratner get those additional rights, some 308,000 square feet? At the same time it gained a transfer of 328,272 square feet from the Atlantic Center mall? I havenāt found out yet.) The duly noticed public hearing generated no testimony, and the cityās daily newspapers covered the land transfer only in light of threats to the garden.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c454/9c4540d4e6bfe2b287da77d29dd2ef5eba210180" alt=""
Would the 7500-square-foot garden be expunged? Bearās stalwarts feared as such, and gathered 4000 signatures during the winter for a banner hung from the garden fence. Gardener Suzanne Chambers told the Daily News in March 1997 that the garden served its community broadly: "We're a botanic garden, we're a park, we're a nature center, we're a safe haven, we're a performance space, we're a community center.ā (At right, poster from the Bear's Garden anniversary celebration in May.)
Borough President Howard Golden negotiated a compromise, allotting $250,000 to preserve the garden, and convincing Forest City Ratner to scale back its development plan by 5000 square feet, allowing for a smaller garden. In a letter to garden-supporters, Golden called the garden the āgateway to Downtown Brooklyn.ā
The garden was entirely uprooted, as the site served in part as a staging area for construction. Gardeners removed some 5000 bulbs, shrubs and perennials, but a grove of 30-foot white birch trees couldnāt be moved and met their demise.
The process went slowly. As Crow wrote in a 10/9/97 letter to the Times, āWe dutifully abandoned our garden early last spring, working in often inclement weather, to fulfill our part of an agreement meant to preserve a smaller, permanent space for the Bears at the same site. It wasn't until late September that construction actually began. You can imagine how sad it was to be treated like unwanted trespassers on the very land we nurtured for more than 15 years.ā
Garden reestablished
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1afe6/1afe6e01c68cc4dd2e6d165c96cb4d32930b54e6" alt=""
The big box stores, with anti-urban blank walls, were by design placeholders, ātaxpayersā in the architectsā parlance, built to generate revenue before being replaced. The Atlantic Yards plan would not encompass the garden, now deeded to the Trust for Public Lands, but it would extend Downtown Brooklyn into neighborhood Brooklyn, notably across Flatbush Avenue on Pacific and Dean streets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ecde/4ecde0cd3db90d8a416835ead3c9803872e83be3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39985/3998589e47c441aad9d0bc00660f537b5ff257c4" alt=""
I sat in the garden on a recent Sunday with Crow, with the iconic Williamsburgh Savings Bank in the background, and the honking of cars and the rumbling of buses hardly muffled. We were surrounded by green, with sunflowers peppering the scene.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc4b3/dc4b3d876358c86e2cfd44d8bc42be425a193fa2" alt=""
āItās always been nasty and loud,ā Crow said of the crossroads. āIt needed calming.ā But calming would be even more of a challenge. He has joined the vocal opposition to the Atlantic Yards project.
Shadows on the green
The lot sits in shadow, literally and figuratively, of the Atlantic Yards project. The 620-foot (650-foot, with mechanicals) Miss Brooklyn would stand diagonally across the street and deny sun to the garden until at least 11 a.m. May through August, prime growing season, according to the the Shadows chapter of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) from the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC). The 350-foot building next door, on Site 5, surprisingly enough, would cast shadows for only 45 minutes at the end of the day in June.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2268c/2268cfa7641fe28fb3995b9936a02bf5ec52413d" alt=""
Lots of noise
Building a major project is hardly a dainty process. In fact, construction of the building at Site 5 would require a 16-foot barrier, but even that wouldnāt shield the garden from noise.
The garden would face āsignificant adverse noise impacts during some portion of the construction period,ā the DEIS acknowledges in the Unavoidable Impacts chapter, with āno feasible and practicable mitigation.ā
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c891d/c891d0b1d324b829322ea82a4be1b5a3c00d1ccc" alt=""
If the Bearās garden is the gateway to Downtown Brooklyn, by implication, itās also the gateway to neighborhood Brooklyn. (Across the street: row houses.) The building on Site 5 would have a base of retail around the ground floor and then rise with a series of setbacks and angular forms, designs intended to engage the community and āactivate the streetscape.ā
Still, the DEIS acknowledges, in the Neighborhood Character chapter:
Although this building would relate well to Downtown Brooklyn to its north, it would be of a scale and density new to Pacific Street on its southern face. This building, its scale and the intensity of activity it would engender, would create a localized adverse impact in neighborhood character for the rowhouses along Pacific Street between Flatbush and 4th Avenues.
And, by implication but not admission, to the garden itself.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0600/b06002d6877f6a3a4d56711ad118a9cfcd6a8146" alt=""
And what about the bright lights? The DEIS acknowledges, in the chapter on Urban Design and Visual Resources:
It is anticipated that the proposed lighting and signage for the arena and Building 1 would be visible from some sections of the study area closest to this part of the project site, with views concentrated on Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues. Most residential areas would not have direct views of the lighting and signage. It is not anticipated that the proposed lighting and signage would result in significant adverse impacts on the study area.
In the chapter on Neighborhood Character, the DEIS acknowledges:
These changes would not come without localized adverse neighborhood character impacts in the areas closest to the project site. These include changes in character for residential rowhouses facing Site 5, within sight of the arenaās brightly lit signs.
That would obviously include the garden, but it isnāt mentioned. Crow suggests that bright lights would āstressā the garden.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/037a6/037a68ce41107ef1ed944df54fac26909263b3e8" alt=""
The garden is a thriving, improbably patch of green in the urban scene. But its harmonious charms were not acknowledged in the chapter on Urban Design and Visual Resources, which states, āCurrently, the project site does not include any visual resources and has a blighted character.ā
Actually, the garden is not part of the project site. But the chapter on Open Space, the DEIS says of this and other gardens:
However, they do serve as important visual and passive recreational resources to the community.
Effects ignored
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ef5/94ef51462a4676ea32d570c89973e61c3eeb5abf" alt=""
In their own statement to the ESDC, the Bearās Garden said, āThe development as conceived (creating a neighborhood from scratch) stands to potentially destroy our garden, open space that has been a perfect reflection of and complement to the existingāthrivingācommunity and environs.ā
Questions of roots
The garden now has about 30 active members, though, a decade ago, there were 60 members, with at least 40 active. Part of the change could be attributed to the loss of space, but also to changes in neighborhood demographics, with fewer working-class gardeners.
In January 1997, Crow told the Times: "The reality is, once you've had a garden over 10 years, and the trees are up to the sky, you establish rootsāliterally and figuratively.ā
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90ce3/90ce350e0c0c315d92a7d5e15b4e00c4fe1ddf50" alt=""
But as-of-right development, as opposed to the ESDCās override of zoning, would be more limited. Itās hard to imagine a development that would impinge more. So the gardeners have put another banner on their fence.
Comments
Post a Comment