Skip to main content

Arena bonds authorization coming Tuesday: questions about transparency, PILOTs, and infrastructure spending remain

At a meeting Tuesday, the Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corporation (BALDC) surely will authorize arena bonds--which may not be sold immediately, pending the decision on the eminent domain case (which could come today, Tuesday, or next Tuesday).

Meanwhile, it's worth noting some big difference between this process and the recent process for stadium bonds. No board materials are made available before Tuesday's meeting and no public comment is permitted.

By contrast, the New York City Industrial Development Authority, which issued bonds for the new Yankees and Mets stadiums, is required to allow public comment in public hearings prior to board meetings. It also posts project materials ahead of time.

The web site states:
State law requires the NYCIDA to hold a public hearing (with notice published 30 days prior) before providing assistance. For bond transactions, this hearing will also satisfy federal law requirements.
Arena bonds

So, why the above requirements don't apply to the BALDC?

Empire State Development Corporation spokeswoman Elizabeth Mitchell responded:
IDA generally issues private activity bonds for which federal law requires a hearing. In contrast, we are issuing governmental bonds and there is no federal or state requirement for a hearing. The distinction is based on the fact that governments are already subject to a public process, in our case ESDC's prior hearings, for governmental projects. Even if BALDC was subject to the open meetings law, the law does not require that the public be offered a right to comment, only to observe and attend.
Well, the IDA may "generally" issue private activity bonds, but those are taxable. The main bonds for the Yankees and Mets stadiums are tax-exempt (see Congressional hearing testimony by Dennis Zimmerman), as would be the bonds for the Brooklyn arena. So the IDA apparently went beyond the minimum requirements.

Moreover, the ESDC's public process for Atlantic Yards didn't give people an opportunity to comment on the arena bonds themselves, given the lack of specifics about the terms and the ratings.

Size of PILOTs

One thing to keep watch on: how big will the tax-exempt arena bonds be? (There likely will be taxable bonds, as well.) While it's in developer Forest City Ratner's interest to have as much of the arena paid for via tax-exempt bonds, given the estimated (by the New York City Independent Budget Office) $193.5 million in savings, those bonds are repaid via PILOTs (payments in lieu of taxes).

Those PILOTs can't exceed the foregone property tax that would be paid if the land were not tax exempt. The New York City Department of Finance got into serious shenanigans in assessing the land for Yankee Stadium arena.

And the New York City Independent Budget Office, in September, estimated "that a typical property tax assessment would result in a PILOT that falls short of the payments needed to cover debt service in the early years of the project." So, look to the arena bonds to be tailored to respond to this concern.

Mitchell added that certain Board materials will be available at Tuesday’s meeting, but not in advance.

BALDC background

As I wrote in January 2009, The BALDC was authorized by the New York State Job Development Authority (JDA), a sibling agency of the ESDC, “to facilitate financing for the arena and certain infrastructure improvements related to the project.”

Why the JDA? “ESDC and JDA have differing statutory powers,” spokesman Warner Johnston explained. “JDA has the authority to create LDC's; ESDC is more limited.”

The BALDC is not a subsidiary of either agency; rather, the structure is similar to that of the Liberty Bonds Development Corporation. Its role will be limited to the financing of arena bonds and possibly the financing of project infrastructure.

Project infrastructure?

Will there be LDC infrastructure bond financing separate from arena bond financing? "A ‘development fee’ (similar to a rental payment) will be the source of repayment of the infrastructure bonds," ESDC's Warner Johnston said in January.

In January, I wrote that the 2006 Modified General Project Plan (MGPP) budgeted $544.4 million for project infrastructure, with $205 million coming from government funds but no particular source for the rest.

The 2009 MGPP, passed in September, budgets $717 million for project infrastructure, again with $205 million coming from government funds but no particular source for the rest. Will that gap be filled by new bonds?

Board members

The board of directors consists entirely of state officials:
I don't think we should be expecting them to ask many tough questions in public.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

Click on graphic to enlarge. This is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change, and the project is already well behind that tentative timetable.


Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…