
That's not true, and it was confirmed in the architect's own words.
The switcheroo

What about "Downtown Brooklyn"?

Press critic Allan Wolper, writing in the June 2006 issue of Editor & Publisher, wondered why the developer hadn't made the correction in its own materials:
But two days later, Forest City Ratner hadnāt corrected its Web site, which described the project as being in downtown Brooklyn. Thatās why itās so dangerous for the paper to into business with corporations they are supposed to be monitoring.
Covering developer p.r.
No correction ever came. The Times has mostly neglected the developer's p.r.--which I've suggested should be treated as campaign advertising--and has even saluted it.
In an unskeptical 10/14/05 article headlined To Build Arena, Developer First Builds Bridges, the Times reported:
Forest City Ratner also contracted with Knickerbocker SKD, a media consultant, to produce two promotional mailings, each going to more than 300,000 households in Brooklyn. They oversaw publication of a newspaper-style brochure, dubbed The Brooklyn Standard. More recently, Forest City retained the Terrie Williams Agency, a prominent black-owned public relations firm, to represent those groups that signed the community-benefits agreement.
More than two years later, the effort is not the "modern blueprint" the Times posited.
Comments
Post a Comment