Skip to main content

As hearing on new Atlantic Yards school approaches, remember: this "benefit" was required to mitigate "significant adverse impact"

As I wrote, Brooklyn Community Board 8 will hold a public hearing tonight at 7 pm on the New York City School Construction Authority's (SCA) plans to create a primary and intermediate school within District 13.

The location: CNR-Center Light Health Care Center, 727 Classon Avenue (corner of Park Place). Public comments will be accepted until 6/29/15.

The school is to be housed in B15, the a 27-story tower with more than 300 market-rate apartments, part of the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park project, just east of Sixth Avenue between Dean and Pacific streets.

The previous plan (see graphic above) was to put the school in B5, a building over the railyard, with more open space adjacent to it.

Notably, as discussed below, the school may be framed by the developer and even some community groups as a project benefit, but it's more accurately seen as a required mitigation of project impacts.

(Somewhat similarly, the project "open space" is less a gift to the community but rather needed to forestall the impact of new residents on existing open space.)

Other schools in area

From the Final SEIS, note graphic below. I've highlighted B15 with a purple oval.
Schools in area, from Final Supplemental EIS; B15 outlined in purple

Issues at the hearing

One topic likely to come up tonight is construction impacts; the developers must put in double-paned windows, but that likely will affect use of the project open space.

Another issue will be traffic and pedestrian access; though many if not most students will walk, arena activities--especially daytime deliveries and load-in--could pose a challenge.

The Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council said:
Neighborhood children deserve a middle school that reflects the diversity of its school district and is accessible to all. Local residents must have the opportunity to participate in the design process in a meaningful way so that traffic and pedestrian safety at the site is ensured, and the operation of the school works for students, neighbors and nearby fire and police services. Come out and speak up for accountability on one of Atlantic Yards’ key public commitments!
Benefit, or mitigation?

Greenland Forest City has framed the school construction as a project benefit. (It was not, however, part of the original "Jobs, Housing, and Hoops" pitch.)

"The benefits that we are proud of in Brooklyn relate to 2240 [actually 2250] units of affordable housing, relate to a school in the base of one of those housing buildings," Forest City executive Ashley Cotton recently told the Nassau Legislature.

That perspective is also reflected in a statement from the Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council (PHNDC), "One of the key benefits promised by the Atlantic Yards project is a new public school to be created at the site." (The same language has been repeated by the BrooklynSpeaks coalition, which includes PHNDC and several other community groups.)

Actually, as described further below, the school is no gift to the public but rather a requirement to mitigate a "significant adverse impact"--a shortfall in school seats caused by the significant increase in school-age population.

As the New York City Independent Budget Office put it in 2009, "If the school is needed to serve the residents of the new Atlantic Yards buildings, FCRC would build it as part of the project construction, although the city would cover the cost."

Noise

From the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Construction, Community Facilities:
As per the MEC [Memorandum of Environmental Commitments], the proposed school will be constructed to provide adequate noise attenuation so that noise in the vicinity of the school (including Project-related traffic, general construction and the school playground) will not result in interior noise levels within the school in excess of 45 dBA L10.
Ok, but the exterior? What about the students outside? Note that the language above indicates that the school playground will be outside.

Who's paying?

The school is expected to occupy 100,000 square feet in the building, and will have capacity for 616 seats. Greenland Forest City Partners has agreed to build space for the school, which will be paid for by the SCA.

The "Alternate Sites Analysis" at bottom states, "Because the proposed space within the planned B-15 building would help to accommodate the increase in the local public school student population associated with the new housing that is under consideration and planned as part of the Atlantic Yards project, no alternative sites have been considered."

Greenland Forest City is paying for the school's core and shell, while the city will pay for construction. The developer gets the right to increase the project buildout elsewhere by the 100,000 square feet that will be devoted to the school.

In other words, it's not a huge lift for Greenland Forest City, but it helps deflect attention from the use of eminent domain and the drastic difference in scale.< From the 2009 Modified General Project Plan:
If DOE determines that there is a need for a School, FCRC will be permitted to increase the size of the buildings located east of 6th Avenue by up to a total of 100,000 square feet in the aggregate to provide such space for the School without reducing the proposed project program. At DOE's option, DOE shall have the right to own or lease such square footage from FCRC. If the square footage is leased to DOE, such lease shall be on a triple net basis with a total rent of $1.00. If the square footage is conveyed to DOE, the total consideration shall be $1.00. FCRC will construct the School's core and shell; DOE will construct the School's fit out. FCRC and DOE will agree upon a total cost for the core and shell construction, costs above which will be paid by FCRC.
On mitigation

Note that different project documents project different times for the impacts.

From the 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement, Executive Summary:
The proposed project would result in a significant adverse impact to both elementary and intermediate schools within the ½-mile study area when enrollment at these schools exceeds their program capacities, which could be as early as 2013. [Note: that was presumed on a faster project buildout.] While there would be projected shortfalls in elementary and intermediate school seats for schools located within ½ mile of the project site, there would remain available capacity in both the larger CSD 13 and CSD 15 (and thus CSDs 13/15 combined). Although the methodology outlined in the CEQR Technical Manual calls for the assessment of school capacity within the larger CSD, the elementary and intermediate school shortfalls within the ½-mile study area would be substantial enough to create a significant adverse impact to elementary and intermediate schools in the vicinity of the project site. To mitigate this shortfall, either one or a combination of the following measures would need to be undertaken: shifting the boundaries of school catchment areas within the CSDs to move students to schools with available capacity; creating new satellite facilities in less crowded schools; leasing school space to be constructed on the project site; and building new school facilities off-site.
Since the issuance of the DEIS, the project sponsors have reached an agreement with the New York City Department of Education (DOE) that upon DOE’s request, the project sponsors would provide adequate space for the construction and operation of an approximately 100,000-square foot elementary and intermediate school in the base of one of the Phase II residential buildings. At this time, the lower floors of Building 5, located on the east side of 6th Avenue between Atlantic Avenue and Pacific Street, have been identified as a possible site. This school space would be made available at a time that would allow the school to be constructed and open at the beginning of the school year in which the significant adverse impact would be projected to occur, i.e., when the projected enrollment in either the elementary or intermediate schools within ½ mile of the project site would exceed their program capacities. This could occur as early as 2013.
The new school would be designed in accordance with DOE’s specifications for new P.S./I.S. construction, and would include standard school facilities such as classroom, administration, and assembly space, gymnasium, cafeteria, library, and outdoor play areas. The school would have a separate entrance from the other uses within the building.
(Emphases added)

That changed by 2009, when the project was reapproved, with a Technical Memorandum. As summarized in the  Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement:
The 2009 Technical Memorandum included a revised analysis to determine whether the changed background conditions (including new enrollment data and updated enrollment projections) and updated methodologies (i.e., a change to the CEQR generation rates for public school students and child care eligible children) would result in any new or different impacts than those previously identified in the 2006 FEIS. The revised analysis concluded that the Project would result in a significant adverse impact on elementary schools within the ½-mile study area but that it would no longer result in a significant adverse impact on intermediate schools in the ½- mile study area. The Project sponsors’ obligation to provide space for an elementary and intermediate public school on the project site was included in the MEC [Memorandum of Environmental Commitments] associated with the 2009 Modified General Project Plan (MGPP). 
Here's the June 2014 Second Amendment Memorandum of Environmental Commitments:
As mitigation for the projected significant adverse impact to the supply of elementary and intermediate school seats, FCRC shall, if requested by the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”) or the New York City School Construction Authority (“SCA”) prior to the date that is 18-months prior to the anticipated commencement of construction of the first Phase II residential building constructed after completion or substantial completion of each of the Phase I residential buildings (or such other date agreed to in writing by FCRC, DOE and ESD), convey or lease to DOE, space within a development parcel sufficient in size to allow for the development of an approximately 100,000 gross square foot elementary and intermediate public school of contiguous space, a portion of which shall be located on the ground floor of the building (the “School”).
Update: note that, as hinted (though not fully explained) in the memo above, by 2014 the state had actually reversed its 2009 change, stating in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement:
The 2006 FEIS also disclosed a significant adverse impact on intermediate schools, but the 2009 Technical Memorandum did not find a significant adverse impact. Therefore, the combination of the Extended Build-Out Scenario and updated analysis methodology and baseline data would result in a significant adverse impact that was not disclosed in the 2009 Technical Memorandum but would not alter the previous finding of the 2006 FEIS that the completed Project would result in a significant adverse impact to intermediate schools.
Zimbalist footnote

Fun fact: Forest City Ratner consultant Andrew Zimbalist, a sports economist, concluded in his (discredited) 2005 report, "Hence, it does not seem that the Atlantic Yards development will necessitate the construction of any new school buildings"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.