Skip to main content

Revealed: Forest City would swap school from Building 5 (requires costly deck) to Building 15 (would displace homes)

Moving the school south, most likely
An important and potentially alarming change was quietly disclosed in the Mitigation chapter of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) issued 3/28/14 by Empire State Development.

The location for the planned 757-seat, 100,000-square-foot school in the project has been shifted.

Instead of being included, as long expected, in Building 5, over the railyard just east of Sixth Avenue between Pacific Street and Atlantic Avenue (below left), it likely will be placed in Building 15, one block south between Pacific and Dean streets (below right).

The site for Building 5
No explanation is provided, but the move would serve developer Forest City Ratner's interests in multiple ways, while allowing it to fulfill its obligation to provide space for the school early in Phase 2 of the project, which involves all the buildings east of the arena block.

Serving Forest City's interests

First, by not putting the elementary/intermediate school in Building 5, Forest City can continue to delay constructing an expensive deck over the railyard and instead focus on building on terra firma, the four towers on the southeast block of the project (as pledged) as well as Building 15.

Second, placing a much-needed school (to be built out by the city) in the residential tower may moderate concern over the dramatic difference in scale on Dean Street, where two- and three-story row houses would be demolished, leaving a 27-story building next to four-story apartment buildings.

The site for Building 15 extends to the two-story house;
the commercial building (back) also faces demolition
It will still be a glaring juxtaposition. “I don't mind a building that is in context with the others, meaning the same height with architectural guidelines, but small streets shouldn't have large development,” then-City Planning Commissioner Amanda Burden claimed in 2008, talking about the Lower East Side. In the case of Atlantic Yards, the state overrode city zoning, with the city's consent.

Also, installing a school--a clear public use--might mitigate the offensiveness of using eminent domain to dislodge owners and tenants of three modest homes on a residential block.

Though eminent domain has been approved, no effort has begun to condemn those properties, though the clock likely soon will begin ticking.

The site for Building 15 is directly below the site for Building 5, both just east of Sixth Avenue 

Complications

Then again, a school--at least if it fronts on Dean Street--would risk interfering with nearby arena loading dock activities to the west across Sixth Avenue as well as a fire station across the street.

(In the photo below, taken last Thursday, note the fire truck sticking out on the sidewalk for washing as well as firefighters' vehicles parked on the sidewalk.)

If the school faces Pacific Street, it might then bear the impacts of construction of the deck over the railyard and then the adjacent building(s). Buses would have to navigate residential Pacific Street and perhaps use residential Carlton Avenue.

If the school fronts on Sixth Avenue, opposite the arena block, it wouldn't interfere with the loading dock, but it could conflict with other arena-related activity, especially when large shows like the circus bring too many trailers to handle and park on neighborhood streets.

Whatever the design, it would be a tight fit. As noted below, the school site apparently cannot accommodate a street-level playground but instead would have "outdoor rooftop play areas." Below, a video of the site for Building 15.



Honing in on the location

According to the Mitigation chapter of the Draft SEIS, Building 15 is not the only possible location:
As per the MEC [Memorandum of Environmental Commitments], the proposed school would be located in one of the Phase II residential buildings, as determined by the project sponsors and the New York City School Construction Authority (SCA) on behalf of DOE. At this time, the project sponsors have identified two possible sites for the potential new school: Building 6 or Building 15. Based upon currently available information, the more likely site for the school would be in Building 15.
However, it's highly unlikely they'd first build a deck for Building 6, which would be located over the railyard adjacent to Building 5, before starting from the corner. Nor do they plan to build a deck while they can first build on terra firma.

There's no explanation as to why Building 5 was dropped, but surely the cost of the deck is a factor.

In an interview with radio host Brian Lehrer in July 2006, Forest City executive Jim Stuckey (since departed) said "we have agreed at Building 5, at Sixth and Atlantic, would make space available, should the city decide to put a school at that location."

The Final Environmental Impact Statement, released in November 2006, said that "Building 5 has been identified as a likely location for the school." That was when a ten-year Atlantic Yards buildout was still contemplated.

The December 2009 Memorandum of Environmental Commitments--which emerged around the same time the state quietly signed contracts giving Forest City Ratner up to 25 years for a project buildout--cited the long-mentioned Building 5 but also left some wiggle room:
It is likely that the School will be located in the lower floors of Building 5 or the first building constructed as part of Phase II. In the event that an alternative location is selected, the School site shall be one of the other residential parcels located east of 6th Avenue as determined by FCRC and DOE.


Building 6 unlikely, what about 1129?

As I said, Building 6 would require an expensive deck, so it's not a plausible candidate. After all, Forest City Ratner executive MaryAnne Gilmartin in October 2012 indicated the firm's intention to build four towers on the southeast block, 1129, after building on the arena block and before building the deck.

The question then arises: why not build a school on Block 1129? I don't know, but Building 15, which is next to the arena block, surely would be better positioned to serve the first residents of Atlantic Yards towers, which will flank the arena.

AY site (blue) straddles two districts
Moreover, Block 1129 will be the site for underground parking; perhaps that might interfere with the construction of a school.

Other concerns about site near Sixth Avenue

The Atlantic Yards footprint, outlined crudely in blue at right, is located mainly in school District 13, and partly in District 15.

“But Building 5, which is mentioned as a possible location, is a highly INAPPROPRIATE site for a school," testified Mary-Powel Thomas, president of District 15 Community Education Council, in September 2006 on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.



"It’s right in the middle of all the traffic, noise, and air pollution of Flatbush Avenue, Atlantic Avenue, and Fourth Avenue," she continued. "Those streets separate Building 5 from most of the residential sites. Instead, I suggest putting the school or schools within the residential buildings, as far as possible from Flatbush Avenue."

District 15
"I’m still not happy with the Building 5 location,” she said two months later. “It’s right next to the arena and right off Atlantic Avenue. I think Buildings 12 and 13 [in the center of the southeast block] would be the best locations. They’re the farthest away from the hustle and bustle.”

Thomas has left the Community Education Council (CEC) and, as far as I know, neither the District 15 CEC nor the adjacent District 13 CEC have publicly weighed in on the issue of a school. (Here's more on the 32 CECs in the city.)

District 13 vs. District 15

As noted, most of the Atlantic Yards site would not be in District 15, which includes most of Park Slope, as well as neighborhoods south and west. (Maps from NYC DOE School Search.)

Only the portion of the site west of Fifth Avenue, including the arena plaza (and future office tower), and Site 5 (home to P.C. Richard and Modell's, to be replaced by a future tower) would be in northeast tip of District 15.

District 13
Most of the 22-acre site would be in District 13, which includes Prospect Heights, Fort Greene, Downtown Brooklyn DUMBO, a piece of Park Slope, most of Clinton Hill, and part of Bedford-Stuyvesant.

If a school were built just east of Sixth Avenue, it would be in District 13.

But it would not be surprising to see some debate and conflict over its placement, given that District 15 is seen as having stronger schools.

Plan in progress

If Building 15 gets the school, that would make construction more complicated. Right now, a 150-space below-grade garage is planned under the school.

However, under the Reduced Parking Alternative, in which total Atlantic Yards parking is cut to 1200 spaces, the garage under Building 15 would be eliminated. So I'm betting there's no parking under the tower if a school is built there.

One of the three potential construction sequences--worst-case scenarios, thus not necessarily likely--studied in the Draft SEIS shows Building 15 as the first tower constructed, beginning in June 2018 and completed by March 2021.

That's a long time, but it also presumes conventional construction, not modular construction, which is supposed to save time, so neither the date nor the duration are fixed.

According to the Mitigation chapter, Forest City has already begun discussing the school with the city's School Construction Authority (SCA), and there's money in the capital plan:
The DOE’s 2015-2019 Proposed Five-Year Capital Plan, February 2014, proposes to allocate capital funds for the creation of the school facility at Atlantic Yards. Discussion between the project sponsors and SCA regarding the inclusion of the school in either Building 6 or Building 15 have recently commenced. Pending the adoption of the Proposed Capital Plan, finalization of the location of the Phase II school, and approval of that school site pursuant to the SCA’s enabling legislation, the SCA and project sponsors would engage in a collaborative design process. As soon as practicable after receipt of the request from DOE or SCA, the project sponsors would consult and cooperate with SCA in its public review process for site selection, thereafter cooperate with DOE and SCA in their design process in accordance with SCA/DOE practice, and construct the building containing the proposed school as soon as practicable after SCA approves the design of the proposed school, completes its public review process, and authorizes commencement of construction of the core and shell of the school and the financing of the school.
The new school facility would be designed in accordance with DOE’s requirements, and would include standard school facilities such as classroom, administration, and assembly space, gymnasium, cafeteria, library, and outdoor rooftop play areas. The school would have a separate entrance from the other uses within the building. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.