Skip to main content

After Times coverage of "City's Painful Din," commenters bring up the Barclays Center

A long, front-page New York Times article yesterday, Behind City’s Painful Din, Culprits High and Low, described the impacts of construction noise, helicopters, trains, motorcycles, and more on residents' peace and quiet.

The article (natch) didn't mention the Barclays Center, the construction of which was marked by after-hours construction and noisy equipment, and the operation of which includes noise leaking from bass-heavy concerts. But several commenters, including me, brought it up. And my comment even was a "NYT Pick."

Comments on the Barclays Center

Mike, NYC:
Residents near the Barclay's Center have been suffering for years. First there was the noise of tearing down homes that people had been forced out of using eminent domain. Up next, the construction of the world's ugliest and least wanted arena. Then, the crowds of folks from other neighborhoods pouring out of the place late at night after games and concerts. And, now, the construction of the first of many new gigantic buildings as part of the arena project has been going from 5:30am to 11pm daily.
The city essentially gave away the land for this project, kicked locals out of their homes, built something nobody nearby wanted, and is continuing to torture us with construction noise for all but 6 1/2 hours a day. If we sleep, then every waking hour is filled with noise. Shame on the city and the profiteers who have destroyed what was once a nice place to live.
Norman Oder, Brooklyn:
The Barclays Center has also been the source of noise leaking regularly from bass-heavy concerts, which has led to several notices of violation, only of which has so far been sustained, for the rather minuscule penalty of $3200.
The New York Times has barely mentioned this noise problem, and it has not reported on the penalty being paid.
At a recent community meeting, a Department of Environmental Protection official said, “I want to let the community know we're monitoring the Barclays Center... We’re trying to work collectively to come up with a solution that will satisfy not just the community but the Barclays Center and the agency.”
What exactly that was remained unspecified, since there were additional just before that meeting regarding the latest concert, Bruno Mars.
For more, see my blog:
Noise reports--from concerts, construction, and more--at Atlantic Yards Watch:
bencharif, Staten Island, NY:
Well of course one can escape the din, have a garden, and be awakened by birds and still live in one of the five boroughs. The borough I refer to is the least populated and least chic of the bunch --- a combination ensuring that, even here, only a short walk to the Staten Island Ferry, one can look out the window and see the sky.
True, I can't get a latte at 2 a.m. or find Cahiers du Cinema on my local newsstand, but I have no regrets about exchanging an old house in Fort Greene for an old house in St. George, especially when I return to attend summer events with old friends and find The New Manhattan all around me in places that used to be called, generically, downtown Brooklyn.

The nonstop cacophony around the odious Barclays Center is an example of what the future bodes for neighborhoods considered desirable by investment bankers, hipsters and the creative class. What developer, retailer or promoter can resist those compelling downtown Brooklyn demographics?
Sandy Reiburn, Brooklyn, NY: 
The noise assaults on quality of life & health go well beyond those addressed in this important article.
In this Bloombergian city where the right to make money trumps neighborly consideration & impotent laws...unending street fairs with amplified...raging decibel levels...booths with blasting music & carny beckoning ad nauseum...subjects residents & passersby to attacks on their hearing & their health.
Even as the DOT schemes for pedestrian plazas (in the NYCEDC quest to "develop" & "better" neighborhoods often at the expense of residential sentiment but ALWAYS supported by real estate developers!) one finds the Business Improvement District "BIDs" imposing musical "events" amplified & ready to invade adjacent residents' homes & apartments...i.e. FAB Allliance in Ft Greene, for one...with little recourse.
Told to call 311 about noise issues insults the intelligence...ask anyone living within the Barclays Center blocks who've been forced to put up with Ratner's NYC govt. "blessed" shoddy noise insulation while concerts invade their sleep ...the penalties are few if non-existent.
Finally...the white noise machines...the ear plugs...are all well and good...however, there is now a generation of deafened New Yorkers... harmed by loud music ear buds who've irreparably damaged their hearing. They require more amplification because they cannot hear properly...they aren't cognizant of ambient noise...the rest of us just suffer.
The boom in after-hours variances

David, New York City:
I would like to point out that applications for AHVs [after-hours variances] have increased from just 59,128 filed in 2007 to 128,605 more recently. With so many more projects seeking permission to work outside of normal work hours, it is critical that DOB/DOT ensure that projects are granted AHVs only when mandated under existing code.
Under NYC Code 24-223, AHVs may only be issued in cases of emergency, public safety and City construction projects, with minimal noise impact. However, it is my understanding that the AHV application form neither lists the requirements for an AHV nor contains sections for the applicant to prove that it has met them. Further we understand that renewals of such AHV are self-certified.
Similarly, DOB does not require developers to prove undue financial hardship (which is often cited in AHV applications), which may explain why some of the most expensive apartments in the City are being constructed with AHVs during late-night, early morning and weekend work for years.
The Code establishes criteria for issuing AHVs which ensure that developers work after-hours only when necessary or when the work will not impact the surrounding community, but DOB appears unwilling to hold developers to these requirements.
I could go on and on, but space and character limitations do not permit.
David M. Pincus
Co-Chair, Quality of Life Committee
Manhattan Community Board 4

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…